News consumption and COVID-19: Social perception
Consumo de noticias y COVID-19: Percepción social
Palabras clave:
media consumption, news coverage, information overload, Catalonia, COVID-19Resumen
On 14 March 2020, the Spanish Government declared a state of alert for the first time since the reinstatement of democracy, confining millions of people to their homes in effort to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid emergency situations such as this, people need to be informed (Seeger et al., 2003). In light of this demand for information, the media responded by heightening the attention afforded to the pandemic and its news coverage, a phenomenon which has occurred repeatedly in similar situations (Ducharme, 2020; Pieri, 2018). Based on a survey of over 2,000 Catalan citizens during the period of lockdown, the main aim of this article is to analyse how the pandemic changed their information habits, gauge their perception of the media’s coverage and determine whether this coverage produced information overload. The results show an upsurge in media consumption as well as information overload among virtually half the population. This generates a paradox: despite the increased consumption of information, the media did not help to improve people’s understanding of the pandemic, but instead resulted in information fatigue, thus hindering comprehension.
Resumen
El 14 de marzo de 2020, el Gobierno español decretó el estado de alarma por primera vez en democracia, que confinó en sus hogares a millones de personas para combatir la pandemia de la COVID-19. Ante situaciones de alarma de este tipo, los ciudadanos necesitan estar informados (Seeger et al., 2003). Los medios responden a esa exigencia de información con un incremento de la atención mediática sobre la pandemia y de su cobertura informativa, fenómeno que se repite como constante en situaciones análogas (Ducharme, 2020; Pieri, 2018). A partir de una encuesta a más de 2000 ciudadanos de Catalunya durante el confinamiento, el presente artículo tiene como objetivos principales analizar si la pandemia modificó sus hábitos informativos, como percibieron la cobertura realizada por los medios y si se produjo sobrecarga informativa. Los resultados muestran un incremento del consumo informativo, así como sobrecarga informativa en casi la mitad de los ciudadanos. Ello genera una paradoja, a pesar de incrementar el consumo informativo, los medios no contribuyeron a mejorar su comprensión de la pandemia sino a generar una fatiga informativa que dificultó esa comprensión.
Palabras clave: consumo informativo; cobertura informativa; sobrecarga informativa; Catalunya; COVID-19.
Descargas
Citas
Abraham, T. (2007). Twenty-first century plague: the story of SARS. Hong Kong University Press.
Asociación de la Prensa de Madrid [APM]. (2020, April 29). Aparecen algunos síntomas de saturación informativa en el consumo de medios durante el confinamiento. https://www.apmadrid.es/aparecen-algunos-sintomas-de-saturacion-informativa-en-el-consumo-de-medios-durante-el-confinamiento/
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101
Boehlert, E. (2014, October 15). The media’s Ebola coverage: The more you watch, the less you know? Media matters for America. https://www.mediamatters.org/cnn/ebola-coverage-more-you-watch-less-you-know
Brodie, M., Hamel, E., Brady, Kates, J., & Altman, D. (2004, February 28). AIDS at 21: Media cover- age of the HIV epidemic 1981-2002. Columbia journalism review, supplement to the March/April, 1-8. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/7023.cfm
Cantero-de-Julián, J. I., Sidorenko-Bautista, P., & Herranz-de-la-Casa, J. M. (2020). Radiografía de la pandemia: Análisis de la cobertura periodística de la COVID-19 en portadas de periódicos. Profesional de la información, 29(5), e290523. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.23
Chae, J. (2016). Who avoids cancer information? Examining a psychological process leading to cancer information avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 21(7), 837-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177144
Consell de L’Audiovisual de Catalunya [CAC]. (2020, May). Butlletí d’informació sobre l’audiovisual a Catalunya (BIAC). Especial coronavirus 2. Número extra. https://www.cac.cat/sites/default/files/2020-05/BIAC_Coronavirus2_rev_0.pdf
Cornia, A., Ghersetti, M., Mancini, P., & Odén, P. (2016). The Partisans, the Technocrats and the Watch- dogs: Domestication in media coverage of the swine flu pandemic in 2009. Journalism Studies, 17(8), 1030-1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1040891
Covello, V. (2003). Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. Journal of health communication, 8, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851971
Davis, J., & French, T. N. (2008). Blaming victims and survivors: An analysis of post-Katrina print news cover- age. Southern Communication Journal, 73(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940802219736
Ducharme, J. (2020, February 7). News coverage of coronavirus in 2020 is very different than it was for Ebola in 2018. Time. https://time.com/5779872/coronavirus-ebola-news-coverage
Eppler, M. J. (2015). Information quality and information overload: The promises and perils of the information age. In L. Cantoni & J. A. Danowski (Eds.), Communication and Technology (pp. 215-232). De Gruyter Mouton.
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20, 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
Garfin, D. R., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. (2020). The novel coronavirus (Covid-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health psychology, 39(5), 355-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000875
Government of Spain. (2020). Royal Decree 463/2020, of 14 March 2020, declaring the state of alert for the management of the health crisis caused by COVID-19. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 67, 14 de marzo, 25390 25400. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2020/03/14/463
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University.
Hanif Soroya, S., Farooq, A., Mahmood, K., Isoaho, J., & Zara, S. (2021). From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Information Processing & Management, 58(2), 102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440
Hong, H., & Hyo Jung, K. (2020) Antecedents and Consequences of Information Overload in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(24), 9305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249305
Johns Hopkins University. (2020, May 1). Coronavirus resource center. Mortality Analysis. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
Kilgo, D. K., Yoo, J., & Johnson, T. (2019). Spreading Ebola panic: Newspaper and social media cover- age of the 2014 Ebola health crisis. Health communication, 34(8), 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1437524
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
Lázaro-Rodríguez, P., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Noticias sobre COVID-19 y 2019-nCoV en medios de comunicación de España: el papel de los medios digitales en tiempos de confinamiento. El profesional de la información, 29(3), e290302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.02
Lewison, G. (2008). The reporting of the risks from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in the news media, 2003-2004. Health, risk and society, 10, 241-262.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802160962
Mandeville, K., O’Neill, S., Brighouse, A., Walker, A., Yarrow, K., & Chan, K. (2013). Academics and competing interests in H1N1 influenza media reporting. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 68, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203128
Mora-Rodríguez, A., & Melero-López, I. (2021). Seguimiento informativo y percepción del riesgo ante la COVID-19 en España. Comunicar, 66, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-06
Muralidharan, S., Rasmussen, L., Patterson, D., & Shin, J. H. (2011). Hope for Haiti: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public relations review, 37(2), 175-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.010
Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2012). Crying wolf? Biosecurity and metacommunication in the context of the 2009 swine flu pandemic. Health & place, 18(4), 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.02.008
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org
Nielsen, R. K., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennen, J. S., & Howard, P. (2020). Navigating the ‘in- fodemic’: How people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism & University of Oxford.
Pieri, E. (2018). Media framing and the threat of global pandemics: The Ebola crisis in UK media and policy response. Sociological research online, 24(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811966
Seeger, M., Sellnow, T., & Ulmer, R. (2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Sage.
Schmitt, J. B., Debbelt, C., & Schneider, F. (2018) Too much information? Predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1151-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305427
Schneider, S. (1987). Information overload: Causes and consequences. Human Systems Management, 7(2), 143-153.
Scoones, I. (2010). Avian influenza: Science, policy and politics. Earthscan.
Swar, B., Hameed, T., & Reychav, I. (2017). Information overload, psychological ill-being, and behavioral intention to continue online healthcare information search. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.068
Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. Random House.
Thompson, R., Garfin, D., Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2017). Distress, worry, and functioning following a global health crisis: A national study of Americans’ responses to Ebola. Clinical psychological science, 5, 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617692030
Vasterman, P., & Ruigrok, N. (2013). Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media: Media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. European journal of communication, 28, 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113486235
Vis, F. (2009). Wikinews reporting of hurricane Katrina. In A. Stuart & T. Einar (Eds.), Citizen journalism: Global perspectives (pp. 65-74). Peter Lang.
Washer, P. (2006). Representations of mad cow disease. Social science & medicine, 62(2), 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.001
Watson, B. (2015). Is Twitter an alternative medium? Comparing Gulf Coast Twitter and newspaper coverage of the 2010 BP oil spill. Communication research, 43(5), 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565896
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2020, February 2). Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf
York, C. (2013). Overloaded by the News: Effects of News Exposure and Enjoyment on Reporting Information Overload. Communication Research Reports, 30(4), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.836628
Zhang, X., Ma, L., Zhang, G., & Wang, G. S. (2020). An integrated model of the antecedents and consequences of perceived information overload using WeChat as an example. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 18(1), 19-40.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
