Threats of employment precarization in Russia in the context of digitalization of the economy and society
Amenazas de la precarización del empleo en Rusia en el contexto de la digitalización de la economía y la sociedad
Palabras clave:
digitalization, precarious employment, labor market, digital economy, labor relations, employment precarizationResumen
Digitalization of public life has a serious impact on the development of social and labor relations. In spite of the fact that digitalization has many positive effects, we can point out that the issue of employment precarization is coming to the fore and it is reflected in the growth of vulnerability and social insecurity among workers. This trend is manifested to the fullest extent in the Russian society. In this regard our paper considers theoretical and practical issues of employment precarization in Russia in the context of its rapid digitalization. In the course of our analysis we clarify the concept of precarious employment, identify digitalization trends and the extent and causes of instability in the social and labor sphere. In particular, we have found out that more and more people are involved in unstable labor relations against the background of the rapidly forming digital environment in the country.
Resumen
La digitalización de la vida pública tiene un grave impacto en el desarrollo de las relaciones sociales y laborales. A pesar de que la digitalización tiene muchos efectos positivos, puede afirmarse que las cuestiones relacionadas con la precarización del empleo están cobrando relevancia y se reflejan en el incremento de la vulnerabilidad y la inseguridad social de los trabajadores. Esta tendencia se manifiesta en toda su extensión en la sociedad rusa. En este sentido, el artículo analiza las cuestiones teóricas y prácticas de la precarización del empleo en Rusiaen el contexto de su rápida digitalización. En el análisis se aborda el concepto de empleo precario, se identifican las tendencias de la digitalización, el alcance y las causas de la inestabilidad en la esfera laboral y social. En particular, los resultados evidencian que cada vez más personas se ven afectadas por las relaciones laborales inestables en el contexto del entorno de trabajo digital que se está formando rápidamente en el país.
Palabras clave: precarización del empleo; digitalización; empleo precario; mercado de trabajo; economía digital; relaciones laborales.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.19-2.1
Descargas
Citas
Abdrakhmanova, G., Demyanova, A., Dranev, Y., Dyachenko, E., Fridlyanova, S., Fursov, K., ... Kovaleva, G. (2019). Digital Economy Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2019. Moscow: HSE.
Agency for Digitisation Denmark. (2016). A Stronger and More Secure Digital Denmark. Digital Strategy 2016-2020. Copenhagen: Agency for Digitisation. Available at: https://digst.dk/media/16165/ds_singlepage_uk_web.pdf
Bizyukov, P.V. (2013). Unstable forms of employment as a form of degradation of labor relations. The Russian public opinion herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions, 1, 100-109. (In Russian). URL http://www.levada.ru/sites/default/files/vom_1_2013_0.pdf
Bobkov, V.N., Kvachev, V.G., & Kolmakov, I.B. et al. (2018). Precarious employment in Russian Federation: theory and methodology of identification, evaluation and reduction. Moscow: KNORUS.
Brass, I.C., & Hornsby, D. (2019). Digital technological innovation and the international political economy. In T. Shaw, L. Mahrenbach, R. Modi, & X. Yi-Chong (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy (рр. 615-631). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Broughton, A., Green, M., Rickard, C., Swift, S., Eichhorst, W., Tobsch, V., & Tros, F. (2016). Precarious employment in Europe. Part 1. Patterns, trends and policy strategies. Brussels: European Parliament.
Campbell, I. & Price, R. (2016|). Precarious Work and Precarious Workers: Towards an Improved Conceptualisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 7(3), 314-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074
Choi, H. & Mattoni, A. (2010). The contentious field of precarious work in Italy: political actors, strategies and coalitions. WorkingUSA, 13, 213-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2010.00284.x
Cranford, C., Vosko, L., & Zukewich N. (2003). Precarious employment in the Canadian labor market: a statistical portrait. Just labour, 3, 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.164
Cranford, C.J., Vosko, L.F., & Zukewich, N. (2003). The Gender of Precarious Employment in Canada. Industrial Relations, 58(3), 454-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/007495ar
Daheim, C. & Wintermann, O. (2017). 2050: The Future of Work. Findings of an International Delphi-Study of The Millennium Project. Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/2050-the-future-of-work/
European Commission. (2010). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2014). Undeclared work in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2767/37041
Fudge, J. & Owens, R. (2006). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
G20 DETF. (2016). G20 Digital Economy Development and Cooperation Initiative. Toronto: G20. Available at: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2016/g20-digital-economy-development-andcooperation.pdf
I-DESI. (2018). International Digital Economy and Society Index. Final report. SMART 2017/0052. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2759/745483
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2012). From precarious work to decent work. Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: ILO.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: ILO.
Kalleberg, A.L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
Kalleberg, A.L. (2014). Measuring Precarious Work. A Working Paper of the EINet Measurement Group. November. Available at: https://ssascholars.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/einet/files/einet_papers_kalleberg.pdf
Kalleberg, A.L. & Vallas, S.P. (2018). Probing Precarious Work: Theory, Research, and Politics. In A.L. Kalleberg & S.P. Vallas (eds.), Precarious Work (pp. 1-30). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Lapidus, L.V. & Polyakova, Yu.М. (2018). Hygonomics as a new socio-economic model: the development of freelancing and crowdsourcing. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, (6), 73-89. Available at: http://inecon.org/images/stories/publicacii/vesnik-ran/2018/VIE_RAS_6_2018.pdf
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, HG., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Popov, E.V. & Semyachkov, K.A. (2018). Problems of Economic Security for Digital Society in the Context of Globalization. Economy of Region, 14(4), 1088-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-4-3
Popov, А.V. (2018). The expansion of precarious work as a constraint on Russia’s economic growth. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 212(4), 270-293. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.veorus.ru/upload/iblock/a6a/veo_212.pdf
Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C. & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4
Rodgers, G. & Rodgers, J. (1989). Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Brussels: International Labour Organisation.
Sizova, I. & Khusyainov, T. (2017). Labor and employment in the digital economy: The problems of the Russian labor market. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 10(4), 376-396.
Srnicek, N. & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World without Work. London: Verso.
United Nations. (2018). United Nations E-Government survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. NY: United Nations.
Veredyuk, O.V. (2013). Instability of Employment: Theoretical Concept and Assessment of its Scale in Russia. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (1), 25-32. (In Russian). Available at: https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2058
Walwei, U. (2016). Digitalization and structural labour market problems: The case of Germany. International Labour Organization, Working Papers, 994936693502676.
Zakaluzhnaya, N.V. (2015). Contract and Agency Labor and Unstable Employment: Russian and Foreign Experience. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, (4), 116-128. (In Russian). Available at: https://law-journal.hse.ru/data/2016/01/13/1134662203/закалюжная.pdf
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
