Aprendizaje Generativo integral: un modelo para la educación superior ante los desafíos de la inteligencia artificial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1685Palabras clave:
AI literacy, digital skills, generative learning, higher education, active methodologies, entrepreneurship education, ChatGPT, Critical thinkingResumen
Introducción: La tecnología ha revolucionado la educación superior como motor de innovación académica. Destacan la inteligencia artificial (IA) y herramientas como ChatGPT que representan oportunidades e importantes desafíos. Este fenómeno está transforma el proceso de aprendizaje en el entorno universitario y exige una adaptación. Metodología: Desde la hermenéutica se han analizado las tendencias educativas actuales: el aprendizaje centrado en el estudiante (SCL), las metodologías activas y las teorías constructivistas del aprendizaje generativo, indagando en los elementos necesarios para desarrollar una alfabetización en IA (AI Literacy) adecuada en el entorno universitario. Resultados: Se presenta un modelo de Aprendizaje Generativo Integral como marco de actuación a tres niveles para evaluar la implantación de la IA generativa en la educación superior. Discusión: Se discuten los niveles de impacto del modelo enfatizando los aspectos éticos, las implicaciones metodológicas y de evaluación en la interacción con la IA en el proceso de adquisición de conocimientos, competencias y habilidades para estudios universitarios. Conclusiones: Es necesario desarrollar un modelo que integre aspectos metodológicos, éticos y competenciales como el pensamiento crítico, la creatividad y la capacidad de análisis para evaluar los retos y oportunidades que ofrece la IA de forma integral en la educación superior.
Descargas
Citas
Aguado Franco, J. C. (2000) Los MOOC: ¿sustituto o complemento de la formación tradicional? (16), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2020.439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2020.439
Aji, C. A. y Khan, M. J. (2019). The Impact of Active Learning on Students’ Academic Performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73017
Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, M., Ghadi, Y. Y., Shahzad, T., Mallek, F. y Hamam, H. (2024). Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219
Almarzouqi, A., Aburayya, A., Alfaisal, R., Elbadawi, M. A. y Salloum, S. A. (2024). Ethical Implications of Using ChatGPT in Educational Environments: A Comprehensive Review. En A. Al-Marzouqi, S.A. Salloum, M. Al-Saidat, A. Aburayya, B. Gupta (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Power and Dangers of ChatGPT in the Classroom. Studies in Big Data (pp. 185–199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_13
Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y. y Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2729.2012.00490.X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x
Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I. y Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088
Anthology. (2024). La IA en la educación superior: exageración, perjuicio o ayuda. https://www.anthology.com/en-emea/paper/la-ia-en-la-educacion-superior-exageracion-perjuicio-o-ayuda-edicion-espana
Antonio-Manuel Rodríguez-García, D., Sánchez, F. R. y Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2019). Digital competence, higher education and teacher training: A meta-analysis study on the Web of Science. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, 54, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i54.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i54.04
Baskara, FX. R. (2023). AI-Driven Dynamics: ChatGPT Transforming ELT Teacher-Student Interactions. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 13(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.2.2023.261-275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.2.2023.261-275
Becker, G. (1994). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. The University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/human-capital-theoretical-and-empirical-analysis-special-reference-education-third-edition DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Bennett, S., Maton, K. A. y Kervin, L. 2008). The “digital natives” debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality (W. Longhofer & D. Winchester, Eds.; 1991st ed.). Penguin Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
Bernal Guerrero, A. y Cárdenas Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Evaluación del potencial emprendedor en escolares. Una investigación longitudinal. Educacion XX1, 20(2), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.14162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19032
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A. y Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M. y Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
Bozkurt, A. y Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1). https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447
Braga, I. (2019). Critical thinking and problem-solving: from higher education to professional contexts. En I. Chova, LG and Martinez, A.L. y Torres (Ed.), International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2019) (pp. 8701–8709). IATED https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.2075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.2075
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
Davies, P. (1999). What is Evidence-based Education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106
De Obesso, M. y Nuñez-Canal, M. (2021). El modelo educativo híbrido: una respuesta necesaria de la enseñanza universitaria a partir de la Covid-19. En L. Sanchez Santamaria, José; Tosina (Ed.), COVID-19 imperativo para el cambio (pp. 105–119). Tirant Lo Blanch. https://editorial.tirant.com/es/libro/covid-19-imperativo-para-el-cambio-jose-sanchez-santamaria-9788418534546?busqueda=covid&
De Obesso, M., Núñez-Canal, M. y Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2023). How do students perceive educators’ digital competence in higher education? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122284
Del Pozo Andrés, M. (2009). El proceso de Bolonia en las aulas universitarias: una perspectiva europea. Cuestiones Pedagógicas. Revista de Ciencias de La Educación, (19), 55–73. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/Cuestiones-Pedagogicas/article/view/10017
Enguita Fernández, M. (2024). Desafíos y oportunidades para el futuro de la educación superior: “Esta vez Si, con la IA nada será igual en la universidad” Papeles de Economía Española, (180), 3-4. https://www.funcas.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Resumenes-ejecutivos-PEE-180-WEB1.pdf
European Commision. (2020). On Artificial Intelligence-A European approach to excellence and trust White Paper on Artificial Intelligence A European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en.pdf.
Felder, R. M. y Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425
Ferrari, A., Brecko, B. N. y Punie, Y. (2014). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2788/52966
Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P. y Kravjar, J. (2023). ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40979-023-00133-4/METRICS DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Forliano, C., De Bernardi, P. y Yahiaoui, D. (2021). Entrepreneurial universities: A bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120522
Fuentes, A., López, J. y Pozo, S. (2019). Analysis of the digital teaching competence: Key factor in the performance of active pedagogies with augmented reality. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.2.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.2.002
Gadamery Hans-Georg. (2004). Truth and Method (Second). Continuum.
Gisbert Cervera, M., González Martínez, J. y Esteve Mon, F. M. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (0), 2529–9638. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/257631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/257631
Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P. y de Boer, H. (2017). Change in university governance structures in continental Europe. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12127
Gouia-Zarrad, R. y Gunn, C. (2024). Enhancing students’ learning experience in mathematics class through ChatGPT. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3), em0781. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14614
Griesbeck, A., Zrenner, J., Moreira, A. y Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2024). AI in Higher Education: Assessing Acceptance, Learning Enhancement, and Ethical Considerations Among University Students. En A. Rocha, H. Adeli, G. Dzemyda, F. Moreiray A. Poniszewska-Marańda (Eds.), Good Practices and New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 214–227). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60221-4_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60221-4_21
Gros Salvat, B., Garcia González, I. y Lara Navarra, P. (2014). El desarrollo de herramientas de apoyo para el trabajo colaborativo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 12(2), 115-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.2.12.903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.2.12.903
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S. y Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2020.101586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hanushek, E. A. (2013). Economic growth in developing countries: The role of human capital. Economics of Education Review, 37(April), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005
Hwee, J., Koh, L., Yen, R. y Kan, P. (2020). Perceptions of learning management system quality, satisfaction, and usage: Differences among students of the arts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5187
Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Beloki, N., Yarritu, I., Zarrazquin, I. y Artano, K. (2023). Active methodologies in Higher Education: reasons to use them (or not) from the voices of faculty teaching staff. Higher Education, (online). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01149-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01149-y
Konopka, C. L., Adaime, M. B. y Mosele, P. H. (2015). Active Teaching and Learning Methodologies: Some Considerations. Creative Education, 6(14), 1536–1545. https://doi.org/10.4236/CE.2015.614154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.614154
Kouzov, O. (2019). The New Paradigms In Education and Support of Critical Thinking with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools. Serdica Journal of Computing, 13(1–2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.55630/sjc.2019.13.27-40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55630/sjc.2019.13.27-40
Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y. y Chan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178
Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C. y Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: A role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0154-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0154-z
Marcelo, C. y Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H. y Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report. International Association of Universities. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
Mattar, J. y Ramos, D. K. (2019). Active Methodologies and Digital Technologies. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31686/IJIER.VOL7.ISS3.1156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss3.1156
Mcdonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A. y Hingle, A. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines. ArXiv.Org. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01659
Means, B., Bakia, M. y Murphy, R. (2014). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959
Meirbekov, A., Maslova, I. y Gallyamova, Z. (2022). Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2022.101023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101023
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R. y Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mills, K., Ruiz, P., Lee, K.-W., Coenraad, M., Fusco, J., Roschelle, J. y Weisgrau, J. (2024). AI Literacy: A Framework to Understand, Evaluate, and Use Emerging Technology. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.org/2024/06/18/ai-literacy-a-framework-to-understand-evaluate-and-use-emerging-technology/
Molina, E., Cobo. C, Pineda, J. y Ravner, H. (2024). Lo Revolución de la IA en Educación: que hay que saber. Innovaciones Digitales en Educación. Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/Banco Mundial. https://ciec.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Revolucion-de-la-IA-en-educacion.pdf
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A. y Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
Moravec, J. W. y Martínez-Bravo, M. C. (2023). Global trends in disruptive technological change: social and policy implications for education. On the Horizon, 31(3–4), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2023-0007/FULL/XML DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2023-0007
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N. y Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W. y Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2021.100041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W. y Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
O’Neill, G. y McMahon, T. (2005). Student-Centred Learning: What Does it Mean for Students and Lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore y B. McMullin (Eds). Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp- 24-36) AISHE. https://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/3345/1/O'Neill%20and%20McMahon%202005.pdf
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Ramirez Anormaliza, R., Llinàs-Audet, X. y Sabaté Garriga, F. (2015). Evaluación de los Sistemas e-Learning: Estudio de las publicaciones realizadas en la Web Of Knowledge. Ciencia Unemi, 6(9), 31. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol6iss9.2013pp31-41p DOI: https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol6iss9.2013pp31-41p
Rasmussen, E. A. y Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012
Redecker, C. y Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. JRC Science for Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rorty, R. (2009). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833061
Ruskovaara, E. (2014). Entrepreneurship Education in Basic and Upper Secondary Education – Measurement and Empirical Evidence [Tesis doctoral. University of Technology, Lappeenranta]. Repositorio institucional LUT. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-657-5
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/EJED.12532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Skalka, J., Drlik, M. y Švec, P. (2012). E-learning courses quality evaluation framework as part of quality assurance in higher education. 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 1-5). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2012.6402173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2012.6402173
Stojanov, A., Liu, Q. y Koh, J. H. L. (2024). University Students’ Self-Reported Reliance on ChatGPT for Learning: a Latent Profile Analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100243 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100243
Tangney, S. (2014). Student-centred learning: a humanist perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860099
Tuomi, I., Cachia, R. y Villar Onrubia, D. (2023). On the Futures of Technology in Education: Emerging Trends and Policy Implications. JRC Science for Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/079734
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S. y Van Den Brande, L. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. JRC Science for Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/11517
Wakkee, I., van der Sijde, P., Vaupell, C. y Ghuman, K. (2019). The university’s role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z. y Mac, S. (2023). Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities’ Policies, Resources, and Guidelines. Cornell University Arxiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T. y Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.124167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Warr, M. y Mishra, P. (2021). Integrating the discourse on teachers and design: An analysis of ten years of scholarship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103274 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103274
Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative Learning Processes of the Brain. Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP2704_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M. y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Margarita Nuñez-Canal, Ana Fernandez Ardavin, Luis Díaz-Marcos, Oscar Aguado Tevar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
