The definition and monitorization of innovation procurement policies in the EU Countries
Definición y seguimiento de las políticas de contratación pública de innovación en los países de la Unión Europea
Palabras clave:
innovation procurement, pre-commertial procurement, innovation policy, innovation, procurement policyResumen
Public procurement emerges as a potentially powerful instrument for stimulating R&D, with the goal of supplying leading markets for new technologies. The research paper intends to introduce a better understanding of responsibilities and definition activities and monitorization of innovation procurement policies (IPP) in European countries. By identifying key factors responsible for defining such policies alongside monitoring mechanisms used currently or proposed going forward, it provides useful recommendations based on past learnings aimed at enhancing overall effectiveness over time. The main result of this research suggests that policymakers should focus on developing more robust innovation procurement policies that prioritize long-term benefits rather than short-term cost savings.
Resumen
La contratación pública emerge como un instrumento potencialmente poderoso para estimular la I+D, con el objetivo de abastecer a los mercados líderes de nuevas tecnologías. Este trabajo de investigación pretende introducir una mejor comprensión de las responsabilidades y actividades de definición y seguimiento de las políticas de contratación pública para la innovación (PPI) en los países europeos. Al identificar los factores clave responsables de la definición de dichas políticas junto con los mecanismos de supervisión utilizados en la actualidad o propuestos de cara al futuro, proporciona recomendaciones útiles basadas en aprendizajes pasados destinadas a mejorar la eficacia general a lo largo del tiempo. El principal resultado de esta investigación sugiere que los responsables políticos deberían centrarse en desarrollar políticas de contratación pública de innovación más sólidas que den prioridad a los beneficios a largo plazo en lugar de priorizar el ahorro de costes a corto plazo.
Palabras clave: contratación de innovación; contratación pre-comercial; política de innovación; innovación; política de contratación.
Descargas
Citas
Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University.
Afonso, O., & Vasconcelos, P. (2007). Re-examining international technological-knowledge diffusion. International Economic Journal, 21, 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730701345307
Afonso, O., & Vasconcelos, P. (2015). Computational Economics: A concise introduction. Routledge.
Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica, 70, 855-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00312
Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., & Vickers, J. (2001). Competition, imitation, and growth with step-by-step innovation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467-492. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2695893
Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Violante, G. (2002). General purpose technology and wage inequality. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 315-345. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40216070
Alvarez-Pelaez, M., & Groth, C. (2005). Too little or too much R&D? European Economic Review, 49, 437-456. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:49:y:2005:i:2:p:437-456
Ang, J., & Madsen, J. (2015). What drives ideas production across the world? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 19, 79-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100513000229
Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand--Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38, 1235-1247. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:8:p:1235-1247
Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). A Reader on Regulation. In B. Robert & M. Cave (Eds.), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (pp. 19-32). Oxford University Press.
Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726
Backus, D., Kehoe, P., & Kehoe, T. (1992). In search of scale effects in trade and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 377-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90060-U
Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N., & Kneller, R. (2001). Testing the endogenous growth model: public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long run. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 36-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2667400
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2008). Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.
Bound, K., & Puttick, R. (2010). Buying power? Is the small business research initiative for procuring R&D driving innovation in the UK? National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts.
Carayannis, E. (2013). The innovation ecosystem. In E. Carayannis & G. Korres (Eds.), The Innovation Union in Europe. A Socio-Economic Perspective on EU Integration (pp. 3-41). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford University Press.
Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2003). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why us manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
Domingos, A. (2020). Contratação Pública de Soluções Inovadoras. Lisbon International Press.
Edler, J., Blind, K., Georghiou, L., Uyarra, E., Cox, D., Rigby, J., & Nugroho, Y. (2009). Monitoring and evaluation methodology for the EU Lead Market Initiative – A concept development. European Commission.
Edler, J., & Gee, S. (2013). Public procurement and the co-production process innovation. Unpublished manuscript.
Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & Mckelvey, M. (2000). Product versus process innovation: Implications for employment. In C. Edquist & M. McKelvey (Eds.), Systems of innovation; growth, competitiveness, and employment (376-400). Edward Elgar.
European Union. (2014). Innobarometer 2014 – The innovation trends at EU enterprises. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.
European Union. (2016). Innobarometer 2016 – The innovation trends at EU enterprises. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.
European Commission. (2020). The strategic use of public procurement for Innovation in the digital economy. SMART 2016/0040. Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology.
European Commission. (2021). Guidance on Innovation Procurement. Commission Notice.
Farshchian, B. A., Sætertrø, H., & Stålaker, M. (2020). Experiences from an Interpretative Case Study of Innovative Public Procurement of Digital Systems in the Norwegian Public Sector. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
Foxon, T., & Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of learner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 148-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.011
Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). Horizontal innovation in the theory of growth and development. Handbook of economic growth, 2, 93-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.859364
Georghiou, L. (2007). Demanding Innovation. Lead Markets, Public Procurement, and Innovation. NESTA Publication.
Greenberg, E., Hill, C., & Newburger, D. (1979). Regulation, Market Prices, and Process Innovation – The Case of the Ammonia Industry. Westview Press.
Haimowitz, J., & Warren, J. (2007). Economic Value of Standardization. Standards Council of Canada.
Havas, A., Schartinger, D., & Weber, M. (2010). The Impact of Foresight on Innovation Policymaking: Recent Experiences and Future Perspectives. Research Evaluation, 19, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X510133
Hervas, J., Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation, and performance: A misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43, 873-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3
Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public procurement and innovation: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 9, 17-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001
Kumar, K. (2003). Education and technology adoption in a small open economy: theory and evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 7, 586-617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100503020170
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation, 28, 403-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245
Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure, and dynamics of sectors. Economic of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688
Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the Dynamics and Evolution of Industries: Progress and Challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 675-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005
Metcalfe, S., & James, A. (2001). Emergent innovation systems and the delivery of clinical services: the case of intro-ocular lenses. Working Paper of Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition. University of Manchester.
Nemet, G. (2009). Demand pull, technology push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research policy, 38, 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
OECD. (2009). Government at a Glance. OECD.
Probert, J., & Connell, D. (2013). R&D service firm: The hidden engine of the high-tech economy? Research Policy, 42, 1274-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.004
Rodrigues, M., & Araújo, L. (2017). Modelos de análise das políticas públicas. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 83, 11-35.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and 1990s. Frances Printer.
Santos, A.B. (2016). Política pública orientada para a inovação aberta: As condições teóricas, contextuais e programáticas para o seu desenho e implementação, no caso português [PhD Thesis]. ISCTE-IUL - Instituto Universitário Lisboa.
Sebatier, P. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 21-48. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:6:y:1986:i:01:p:21-48_00
Sousa, C., Santos, I., Fontes, M., Bento, N., Trindade, P., Mamede, R.P., Ribeiro, R., & Alves, T. (2021). Mercado da Contratação Pública da Inovação em Portugal. Estudo realizado pelo Iscte e pelo LNEG para a ANI.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. Guilford.
Tsipouri, L., Banciu, D., Bodewes, H., Creese, S., Edler, J., Hargeskog, S., Kalvet, T., Rolfstam, M., Sylvest, J., Thevissen, P., Uyarra, E., & Vass, I. (2010). Risk management in the procurement of innovation. European Commission.
Uyarra. E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European Planning Studies, 18, 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567
VINNOVA. (2006). Public procurement as a driver for innovation and change. VINNOVA Policy VP.
Yaslan, I. (2009). Existence results for an even-order boundary value problem on time scales. Nonlinear Analysis, 70, 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.12.019
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
