The definition and monitorization of innovation procurement policies in the EU Countries: Definición y seguimiento de las políticas de contratación pública de innovación en los países de la Unión Europea

Carolina Morais; Antonio Santos

doi:10.31637/epsir-2023-222

Authors

Carolina Morais Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-8304
Antonio Santos Foundation for Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-3085

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2023-222

Keywords:

contratación de innovación, contratación pre-comercial, política de innovación, innovación social, política de contratación

Abstract

La contratación pública emerge como un instrumento potencialmente poderoso para estimular la I+D, con el objetivo de abastecer a los mercados líderes de nuevas tecnologías. Este trabajo de investigación pretende introducir una mejor comprensión de las responsabilidades y actividades de definición y seguimiento de las políticas de contratación pública para la innovación (PPI) en los países europeos. Al identificar los factores clave responsables de la definición de dichas políticas junto con los mecanismos de supervisión utilizados en la actualidad o propuestos de cara al futuro, proporciona recomendaciones útiles basadas en aprendizajes pasados destinadas a mejorar la eficacia general a lo largo del tiempo. El principal resultado de esta investigación sugiere que los responsables políticos deberían centrarse en desarrollar políticas de contratación pública de innovación más sólidas que den prioridad a los beneficios a largo plazo en lugar de priorizar el ahorro de costes a corto plazo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University.

Afonso, O., & Vasconcelos, P. (2007). Re-examining international technological-knowledge diffusion. International Economic Journal, 21, 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730701345307

Afonso, O., & Vasconcelos, P. (2015). Computational Economics: A concise introduction. Routledge.

Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica, 70, 855-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00312

Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., & Vickers, J. (2001). Competition, imitation, and growth with step-by-step innovation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467-492. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2695893

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Violante, G. (2002). General purpose technology and wage inequality. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 315-345. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40216070

Alvarez-Pelaez, M., & Groth, C. (2005). Too little or too much R&D? European Economic Review, 49, 437-456. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:49:y:2005:i:2:p:437-456

Ang, J., & Madsen, J. (2015). What drives ideas production across the world? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 19, 79-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100513000229

Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand--Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38, 1235-1247. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:8:p:1235-1247

Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). A Reader on Regulation. In B. Robert & M. Cave (Eds.), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (pp. 19-32). Oxford University Press.

Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726

Backus, D., Kehoe, P., & Kehoe, T. (1992). In search of scale effects in trade and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 377-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90060-U

Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N., & Kneller, R. (2001). Testing the endogenous growth model: public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long run. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 36-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2667400

Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2008). Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.

Bound, K., & Puttick, R. (2010). Buying power? Is the small business research initiative for procuring R&D driving innovation in the UK? National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts.

Carayannis, E. (2013). The innovation ecosystem. In E. Carayannis & G. Korres (Eds.), The Innovation Union in Europe. A Socio-Economic Perspective on EU Integration (pp. 3-41). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford University Press.

Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2003). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why us manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552.

Domingos, A. (2020). Contratação Pública de Soluções Inovadoras. Lisbon International Press.

Edler, J., Blind, K., Georghiou, L., Uyarra, E., Cox, D., Rigby, J., & Nugroho, Y. (2009). Monitoring and evaluation methodology for the EU Lead Market Initiative – A concept development. European Commission.

Edler, J., & Gee, S. (2013). Public procurement and the co-production process innovation. Unpublished manuscript.

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003

Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & Mckelvey, M. (2000). Product versus process innovation: Implications for employment. In C. Edquist & M. McKelvey (Eds.), Systems of innovation; growth, competitiveness, and employment (376-400). Edward Elgar.

European Union. (2014). Innobarometer 2014 – The innovation trends at EU enterprises. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.

European Union. (2016). Innobarometer 2016 – The innovation trends at EU enterprises. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.

European Commission. (2020). The strategic use of public procurement for Innovation in the digital economy. SMART 2016/0040. Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology.

European Commission. (2021). Guidance on Innovation Procurement. Commission Notice.

Farshchian, B. A., Sætertrø, H., & Stålaker, M. (2020). Experiences from an Interpretative Case Study of Innovative Public Procurement of Digital Systems in the Norwegian Public Sector. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005

Foxon, T., & Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of learner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 148-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.011

Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). Horizontal innovation in the theory of growth and development. Handbook of economic growth, 2, 93-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.859364

Georghiou, L. (2007). Demanding Innovation. Lead Markets, Public Procurement, and Innovation. NESTA Publication.

Greenberg, E., Hill, C., & Newburger, D. (1979). Regulation, Market Prices, and Process Innovation – The Case of the Ammonia Industry. Westview Press.

Haimowitz, J., & Warren, J. (2007). Economic Value of Standardization. Standards Council of Canada.

Havas, A., Schartinger, D., & Weber, M. (2010). The Impact of Foresight on Innovation Policymaking: Recent Experiences and Future Perspectives. Research Evaluation, 19, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X510133

Hervas, J., Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation, and performance: A misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43, 873-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3

Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public procurement and innovation: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 9, 17-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001

Kumar, K. (2003). Education and technology adoption in a small open economy: theory and evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 7, 586-617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100503020170

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation, 28, 403-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245

Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure, and dynamics of sectors. Economic of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688

Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the Dynamics and Evolution of Industries: Progress and Challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 675-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005

Metcalfe, S., & James, A. (2001). Emergent innovation systems and the delivery of clinical services: the case of intro-ocular lenses. Working Paper of Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition. University of Manchester.

Nemet, G. (2009). Demand pull, technology push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research policy, 38, 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004

OECD. (2009). Government at a Glance. OECD.

Probert, J., & Connell, D. (2013). R&D service firm: The hidden engine of the high-tech economy? Research Policy, 42, 1274-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.004

Rodrigues, M., & Araújo, L. (2017). Modelos de análise das políticas públicas. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 83, 11-35.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and 1990s. Frances Printer.

Santos, A.B. (2016). Política pública orientada para a inovação aberta: As condições teóricas, contextuais e programáticas para o seu desenho e implementação, no caso português [PhD Thesis]. ISCTE-IUL - Instituto Universitário Lisboa.

Sebatier, P. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 21-48. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:6:y:1986:i:01:p:21-48_00

Sousa, C., Santos, I., Fontes, M., Bento, N., Trindade, P., Mamede, R.P., Ribeiro, R., & Alves, T. (2021). Mercado da Contratação Pública da Inovação em Portugal. Estudo realizado pelo Iscte e pelo LNEG para a ANI.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.

Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. Guilford.

Tsipouri, L., Banciu, D., Bodewes, H., Creese, S., Edler, J., Hargeskog, S., Kalvet, T., Rolfstam, M., Sylvest, J., Thevissen, P., Uyarra, E., & Vass, I. (2010). Risk management in the procurement of innovation. European Commission.

Uyarra. E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European Planning Studies, 18, 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567

VINNOVA. (2006). Public procurement as a driver for innovation and change. VINNOVA Policy VP.

Yaslan, I. (2009). Existence results for an even-order boundary value problem on time scales. Nonlinear Analysis, 70, 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.12.019