Chat GPT como catalizador del pensamiento creativo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-410Palabras clave:
creatividad, educación, inteligencia artificial generativa, colaboración, canciones, estudiantes, originalidad, TorranceResumen
Introducción: Este estudio investiga el impacto del modelo de lenguaje Chat GPT en el desarrollo del pensamiento creativo en estudiantes de 12 a 13 años en una institución educativa en Chile. Metodología: Utilizando la Teoría de la Creatividad de Ellis Torrance y aplicando el Test de Pensamiento Creativo de Torrance (TTCT) en un pretest y postest, se evaluó la creatividad en términos de fluidez, flexibilidad y originalidad. La intervención consistió en la creación colaborativa de canciones con la ayuda de Chat GPT. Resultados: Los resultados indicaron un aumento significativo en los indicadores de flexibilidad y originalidad, aunque se observó una ligera disminución en la fluidez. Discusión: Estos hallazgos sugieren que la integración de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) en actividades creativas puede potenciar el pensamiento creativo y fomentar la colaboración entre estudiantes, ofreciendo nuevas oportunidades para innovar en el ámbito educativo. Conclusiones: La integración de Chat GPT como herramienta educativa tiene el potencial de enriquecer el proceso de aprendizaje y promover habilidades creativas críticas para el siglo XXI.
Descargas
Citas
Ahmad Ali Elfar, M. y Tawfilis Dawood, M. E. (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence for enhancing Human Creativity. Journal of Art Design and Music, 2(2), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1017
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
América Retail. (2023, 23 de enero). La IA se convierte en una herramienta fundamental para la creación de campañas y la organización de eventos corporativos. América Retail. https://bit.ly/3LdyVq1
Barron, F. y Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
Beghetto, R. A. y Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203508527
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C. y Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
Campbell, D. T. y Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperCollins.
Fundación Cruzando (2023). Creatividad y educación. https://bit.ly/3rU67FT
García-Peña, V. R., Mora-Marcillo, A. B. y Ávila-Ramírez, J. A. (2020). La inteligencia artificial en la educación: Impacto y oportunidades. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 123-138.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8231632
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Habib, S. (2024). AI can help, and hurt, student creativity. Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2024-02-ai-student-creativity.html
Kaufman, J. C. y Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2
Marrone, T., Taddeo, M. y Hill, A. (2022). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence—A Student Perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065
Mazzone, M. y Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026
McCormack, J., Gifford, T. y Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, Authenticity, Authorship and Intention in Computer Generated Art. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness, 6(2), 234-260. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2705078519500095
Park, J. H., Niu, W., Cheng, L. y Allen, H. (2021). Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in College: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 760351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760351
Robinson, K. (2006, febrero). Do schools kill creativity? [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity
Runco, M. A. y Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. y Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition. Personnel Press.
Zhou, Y., Kuo, Y.-H. y Chang, Y. (2021). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Past, Present, and Future. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(1), 1-20. https://myweb.fsu.edu/vshute/pdf/shute%201996_d.pdf
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Eduardo Silva-Fuentealba
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
