Building a middle-range theory of Transformative Social Innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses
Resumen
This paper argues that there is currently a need for new theory on transformative social innovation that is able to provide empowering insights to practice, especially in terms of how social innovation interacts with transformative change processes. It identifies three ‘pitfalls’ that such theory-building needs to confront, and presents middle-range theory development, together with a focus on social relations and the processes of social innovation, as three elements of a theory-building strategy that responds to these pitfalls. In describing the implementation of this strategy in successive iterations between empirical case study research and integrative analysis, critical reflections are drawn on each of the three elements of the theory-building strategy. Taken together, these reflections underline the importance of maintaining a reflexive approach in developing new knowledge and theory on new social innovation.
Descargas
Citas
Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B. & Jhagroe, S. (2016), The Politics of Sustainability Transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18:5, 557-567.
Avelino, F., J.M. Wittmayer, B. Pel, P. Weaver, A. Dumitru, A. Haxeltine, R. Kemp, M.S. Jørgensen, T. Bauler, S. Ruijsink, T. O’Riordan (forthcoming). Transformative Social Innovation and (Dis)Empowerment: Towards a Heuristic, submitted to Technological Forecasting and Social Change (May 2016).
Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
BEPA (2011). Bureau of European Policy Advisors. Empowering people, driving change: Social Innovation in the European Union. European Commission (2011).
Boggs, J. S., and Rantisi, N.M. (2003). The 'relational turn' in economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 109–116.
Bonifacio, M. (2014). Social innovation: A novel policy stream or a policy compromise? An EU Perspective. European Review, 22(1), 145-169.
Bouchard, M. J. and Trudelle, C. (2013). Exploring the conceptual universe of social innovation: A relational database for a better understanding of its effects on social transformation. In: Social Frontiers, the next edge of social innovation research.
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 82 (2014), 42–51.
Callorda Fossati, E., Degavre, F. and Nyssens, M. (2017). How to build a “sample” of social innovations? Adapting the Delphi method to the needs of a partner-oriented research using case studies, Methodological Challenges in Social Innovation workshop, Brussels (BE), February 9th 2017.
EC (2017). RESEARCH ON SOCIAL INNOVATION. Inventory of projects funded under the EU Research Framework Programmes. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/project_synopses/ssh-projects-fp7-5-6-social-innovation_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American journal of sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29 (1), 1-26.
Franz, H.W. , Hochgerner, J. and Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
Garud, R., and Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy, 41(6), 980-995.
Geels, F.W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257-1274.
Geels, F. W. (2007). Feelings of discontent and the promise of middle range theory for STS examples from technology dynamics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(6), 627-651.
Geels, F. W., and Schot, J. (2010). The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective. In: J. Grin, J. Rotmans and J. Schot (eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change.(pp. 9-101). New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press,1979.
Haxeltine et al. (2015). A first Prototype Theory of Transformative Social Innovation, TRANSIT
Deliverables 3.2, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no:613169.
Haxeltine et al. (2016a). A framework for transformative social innovation. (TRANSIT working paper), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Haxeltine et al. (2016b). On the agency and dynamics of transformative social innovation, (TRANSIT working paper), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Haxeltine et al. (2016c). A second Prototype Theory of Transformative Social Innovation, TRANSIT Deliverables 3.3, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no:613169.
Haxeltine et al. (2017). A consolidated Theory of Transformative Social Innovation, TRANSIT Deliverables 3.3, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no:613169.
Hedström. P. (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press.
Howaldt, J & M Schwarz (2016). SOCIAL INNOVATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SOCIAL CHANGE. Verifying existing Social Theories in reference to Social Innovation and its Relationship to Social Change. Online at: https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/SI-DRIVE-D1-3-Social-Change-final-260416-2.pdf
Jørgensen, M.S, Wittmayer, J, Avelino, F, Elle, M, Pel, B, Bauler, T, Kunze, I, Longhurst, N, (2014). Methodological guidelines for case studies Batch I. TRANSIT Deliverable 4.1, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Jørgensen, M.S, Dorland, J, Pel, B, Wittmayer, J.M. (2015). TRANSIT WP4 D4.2 - Characterisation and comparison of case study findings – Batch 1 cases. Deliverable 4.2 of TRANSIT.
Jørgensen, M.S. et al. (2016). Synthesis across Social Innovation Case-Studies, TRANSIT Deliverable 4.4, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, F., L., and Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation research? In: Moulaert, F. et al. (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation; Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 110-127). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Jørgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development, Research Policy, 41(6), 996-1010.
Klein, J.L., A. Camus, C. Jetté, C. Champagne and M. Roy (2016). La transformation sociale par l’innovation sociale. Montreal: Presses de l’ Université de Québec.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24: 691-710.
Lévesque, B. (2013). Social innovation in governance and public management systems: toward a new paradigm? In: Moulaert, F. et al. (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation; Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 25-39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
McGowan, K., and Westley, F. (2015). At the root of change: The history of social innovation. In: New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research (pp. 52-68). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Merton, Robert K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure, The Free Press: New York.
Moore, M. L., & Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and society, 16(1).
Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum and J.Hillier. (2013). Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In: Moulaert, F. et al. (eds.). The International Handbook on Social Innovation; Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 13-24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Moulaert, F and Van Dyck., B. (2013). Framing Social Innovation Research: a Sociology of Knowledge Perspective. In: Moulaert, F. et al. (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation; Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 466-479). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Moulaert, F. (2016). Recommendations Méthodologiques pour l’analyse de l’innovation sociale: une perspective critique sur l’épiestemologie des systèmes d’innovation territoriaux. In : Klein, J.L., A. Camus, C. Jetté, C. Champagne and M. Roy (eds.), La transformation sociale par l’innovation sociale (pp. 65-78). Montreal: Presses de l’ Université de Québec.
Mulgan, G.(2012). Social Innovation Theories: Can Theory Catch Up with Practice? In: Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 19-42). Springer: Heidelberg.
Murray, R. Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G. (2010). Open Book of Social Innovations. The Young Foundation, NESTA, London.
Narberhaus, M and Sheppard, A. (2015). Re.imagining Activism: A practical guide for the Greate Transition Publisher. Smart CSOs Lab / Michael Narberhaus.
Pel, B. (2014). Intersections in System Innovation; a Nested-case Methodology to study Co-evolving Innovation Journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26 (3), 307-320.
Pelka, B., & Terstriep, J. (2016). Mapping the Social Innovation Maps–The State of Research Practice across Europe. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(1), 3-16.
Pel, B., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. & Jørgensen, M.S., (2017a). Detecting Social Innovation; finding appropriate units of analysis for dispersed transformation processes, Methodological challenges in SI workshop, Brussels (BE), 9 February 2017.
Pel, Bonno, Adina Dumitru, René Kemp, Alex Haxeltine, Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, Flor Avelino, Iris Kunze, Jens Dorland, Julia Wittmayer and Tom Bauler (2017b). Synthesis Report: meta- analysis of Critical Turning Points in TSI, TRANSIT deliverable 5.4 (2017), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Pol, E. and S. Ville, (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885.
Schubert, C. (2014). Social Innovations. Highly reflexive and multi-referential phenomena of today’s innovation society. Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers, 2, 2014.
Sewell, William (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98:1 (July 1992), 1-29.
Stirling, Andrew (2011). Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity. Journal of Environmental Innovation & Societal Transitions, 1 (1). pp. 82-88. ISSN 2210-4224.
Stirling A. (2016). Knowing Doing Governing: Realizing Heterodyne Democracies. In: Voß, J.P. and Freeman R. (Eds.), Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order (pp. 259-286). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42 (11), 1991-2006.
Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 325-342.
Van der Have, R.P. and L. Rubalcaba (2016). Social Innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45, 1923-1935.
Westley, F. (2013). Key Note Speech, The History of Social Innovation, at NESTA Conference Social Frontiers: The Next Edge of Social Science Research, 14-15 November 2013, London UK, at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/key_note_speech_frances_westley_on_the_history_of_social_innovation.pdf
Wildman, W.J. (2006). An Introduction to Relational Ontology. Boston University, May 15, 2006.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
