Los retos de la co-generación en la búsqueda del impacto social de la universidad: un caso de construcción de un espacio dialógico a través de la investigación acción

Challenges for co-generation in the search for social impact of the university: a case of the construction of a dialogic space through action research

Authors

  • Patricia Canto Orkestra Institute of Competitiveness
  • Pablo Costamagna Universidad Tecnológica Nacional FRRA. Argentina
  • Andoni Eizagirre Mondragon Unibertsitatea
  • Miren Larrea Orkestra-Instituto Vasco de Competitividad, Universidad de Deusto

Abstract

Al centro del debate sobre el impacto social de la universidad se encuentra una nueva división del trabajo en la producción de conocimiento que pueda responder a los retos de la sociedad. Esta nueva división del trabajo es más compleja y advierte un giro epistemológico en la forma de organizar la interacción entre conocimiento académico y sociedad. Este artículo plantea cuatro retos identificados a partir de un caso de construcción de un espacio dialógico para la co-generación de conocimiento. El caso, desarrollado a través de la investigación acción, cuestiona el esquema que empaqueta el conocimiento generado en la universidad en forma de artículos, libros, informes o conferencias y que lo comunica de forma lineal y plantea otro basado en el diálogo que permite a los otros actores aportar su propio conocimiento.

Palabras clave: universidad, impacto social, investigación acción, comunicación.    

 

Abstract

At the center of the debate about the social impact of the university we find a new division of work in the production of knowledge that can respond to the challenges of society. This new division of work is more complex and signals an epistemological turn in the form of organizing interaction between academic knowledge and society. This article poses four challenges that were identified based on a case of the construction of a dialogic space for the co-generation of knowledge. The case, which was developed through action research, questions the scheme in which knowledge generated in a university is packaged in the form of articles, books, reports, or conferences and communicated linearly, and suggests another that is based on dialogue and that allows other actors to contribute their knowledge as well.

Key words: university, social impact, action research, communication.

 

FULL TEXT is also available in English from pp. 57 in the PDF link below.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.18-1.5

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aranguren, M. J., Franco, S., Horta, R. y Silveira, L. (2016). Retos y aprendizajes de institutos de investigación transformadora. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 11(1), 69-79. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242016000100010

Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C. (2007). Universities as strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781847206848

Brown, M. and Guston, D. (2009). Science, Democracy, and the Right to Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 351-366. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9135-4

Callon, M., Lascoumes P. and Barthe Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Costamagna, P., y Larrea, M. (2017). Actores facilitadores del desarrollo territorial. Una aproximación desde la construcción social. Bilbao: Publicaciones Deusto. http://www.orkestra.deusto.es/es/investigacion/publicaciones/libros-informes/desarrollo-territorial/1202-actores-facilitadores-desarrollo-territorial-construccion-social

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.

Eizagirre, A. (2017). Investigación e innovación responsables: retos teóricos y políticos. Sociologia. Problemas e Práticas, 83, 99-116. DOI: 10.7458/SPP2017834400

Eizagirre, A., Rodríguez, H. and Ibarra, A. (2017). Politicizing Responsible Innovation: Responsibility as Inclusive Governance. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 20-36. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1440.101003

Felt, U. and Wynne, B. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and…Society Directorate, European Commission. .https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442/language-en

Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to Action Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks (California): Sage.

Karlsen, J. y Larrea, M. (2015). Desarrollo territorial e investigación acción. Innovación a través del diálogo. Bilbao: Publicaciones Deusto. http://www.orkestra.deusto.es/es/investigacion/publicaciones/libros-informes/desarrollo-territorial/206-desarrollo-territorial-investigacion-accion-innovacion-traves-dialogo

Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2018). Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy011

Merton, R. (1942) [1973]. The Normative Structure of Science. In R. Merton and N. Storer (eds.), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 267-278, ch. 13). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Oswald, K., Gaventa, J., and Leach, M. (2017). Introduction: Interrogating Engaged Excellence in Research. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 1-18. DOI: 10.19088/11968-2016.196

Polanyi, M. (1961). The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva, 1(1), 54-74. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026591624255

Rip, A. (2012). Protected spaces of science: their emergence and further evolution in a changing world. In: M. Carrier and G. Michael (eds.), Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation (pp. 197-220, ch. 14). Dordrecht: Springer.

Tandon, R., Singh, W., Clover, D., and Hall, B. (2017). Knowledge Democracy and Excellence in Engagement. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 19-36. DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.197

Trencher, Y., McCormick, K.B. and Doll, C. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151–179. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct044

Van den Daele W. (1978). The ambivalent legitimacy of the pursuit of knowledge. In: B. Egbert and G. Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference Science, Society and Education (pp. 23-61, Ch. 2). Amsterdam: Free University Bookshop.

Ziman, J. (1998). Real Science: What it Is, and What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-02

How to Cite

Canto, P., Costamagna, P., Eizagirre, A., & Larrea, M. (2018). Los retos de la co-generación en la búsqueda del impacto social de la universidad: un caso de construcción de un espacio dialógico a través de la investigación acción : Challenges for co-generation in the search for social impact of the university: a case of the construction of a dialogic space through action research. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 3(1), 46–67. Retrieved from https://epsir.net/index.php/epsir/article/view/79

Issue

Section

Research articles