Patrones de comunicación y dinámicas de poder en la esfera pública digital: Un estudio de caso de la conversación sobre el Ingreso Mínimo Vital en Twitter
Patrones de comunicación y dinámicas de poder en la esfera pública digital: Un estudio de caso de la conversación sobre el Ingreso Mínimo Vital en Twitter
Palabras clave:
digital public sphere, Twitter, Minimum Living Income, power dynamics.Resumen
En 2020, durante la primera ola de la pandemia, el Gobierno español aprobó la puesta en marcha del Ingreso Mínimo Vital, una prestación no contributiva del sistema de seguridad social español que garantiza unos ingresos mínimos a quienes lo necesiten. Basado en el trabajo previo desarrollado por Stefania Vicari et al. (2018) sobre el uso público de hashtags políticos y la contravisualidad en la Twitteresfera italiana, este artículo analiza los patrones de comunicación entre los usuarios de Twitter. Así, este trabajo contribuye a la investigación existente sobre el proceso deliberativo dentro de la esfera digital, con un enfoque particular en las estructuras de poder y los patrones de comunicación. Los resultados muestran que los medios de comunicación nacidos en el ámbito digital, los políticos y los partidos políticos desempeñan un papel central en el debate a través de las prácticas de mención y citación de tuits, pero no en la producción de nuevos mensajes, mientras que los usuarios ordinarios son más propensos a ser retuiteados. Esto sugeriría una tendencia a la retransmisión y difusión de contenidos producidos por usuarios ordinarios más que por fuentes oficiales.
Descargas
Citas
Barabási, A-L. (2009). Scale-Free networks: A Decade and Beyond. Science, 325, 423-413.
Bennet L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action. Digital Media and the Personization of Contentinous Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Boyd, D. (2010). Social Networks Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics and Implications. In Z. Papacharisi (Ed.), Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39-58). Routledge.
Bruns, A.; Highfield, T. (2016). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In G. Enli, A. Bruns, A. O. Larsson, E. Skogerbo, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 56-739). Routledge.
Buchanan, M. (2002). Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks. Perseus Publishing.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication and Power. Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.
Chislett, W. (2020, June 30). Covid-19 ups Spain’s income inequality. Elcano Royal Institute. https://blog.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/covid-19-ups-spains-income-inequality/
Coretti, L. (2014). The Purple Movement: Social Media and Activism in Berlusconi’s Italy [Doctoral dissertation, University of Westminster]. University of Westminster. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/964wx/the-purple-movement-social-media-and-activism-in-berlusconi-s-italy
Costera-Meijer, I., Rogers, R., Westlung, O., Witschge, T., Díaz-Noci, J., & Serrano-Tellería, A. (Eds). (2021). Researching the news in the hybrid media system: An expert panel report. DigiDoc Research Group (Pompeu Fabra University), DigiDoc Reports, 2021. PONR04/2021.
Couldry, N. (2013, November 21). A Necessary Disenchantment: Myth, Agency and Injustice in a Digital World. Inaugural Lecture, London Scholl of Economics and Political Science. London, UK.
Fuchs, C. (2009). Some Reflections on Manuel Castells’ Book “Communication Power”. tripleC, 7(1), 94-108.
Malliaros, F., Rossi, M.E., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2016). Locating influential nodes in complex networks. Sci Rep 6, 19307. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19307
Marres, N. (2017). Digital Sociology. The reinvention of Social Research. Polity Press.
Masip , P., Ruíz-Caballero, C., & Suau J. (2019). Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article. El Profesional de la Información, 28(2), e280204. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04
Milan, S. (2015). From Social Movements to Cloud Protesting: The Evolution of Identity. Information, Communication, and Society, 18(8), 887-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security and Migrations. (2021). Minimum vital income.
Myers, S., & Leskovec, J. (2014). The Bursty Dynamics of the Twitter Information Network. WWW '14 Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web, 913-924.
Parth, A-M., & Nyby, J. (2019). Welfare experiments as tools for evidence-based policy making? The political debate on Twitter about the basic income trial in Finland. Policy Studies, 18(8), 887-900 https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1772217
Pavan, E. (2014). Embedding Digital Communication Within Collective Action Networks: A Multidimensional Network Approach. Mobilization, 19(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.4.w24rl524u074126k
Pavan, E. (2017). The integrative power of online collective action networks beyond protest. Exploring social media use in the process of institutionalization. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1268956
Pérez-Altable, L., Serrano-Tellería, A., & Fernández-Planells, A. (2020). Audiencias activas y desigualdad de ingresos: análisis exploratorio de la conversación en Twitter. Hipertext.net. Revista Académica sobre Documentación Digital y Comunicación Interactiva, 20, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i20.01
Pont-Sorribes, C., Codina, L., & Pedraza-Jiménez, R. (2009). Comunicación de riesgo y sistemas de comunicación en la web: cinco modelos. El Profesional de la Información, 18(4), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.jul.05
Radicioni, T., Squartini, T., Pavan, E., & Saracco, F. (2021). Networked partisanship and framing: a socio semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04653.
Soler-Adillón, J. (2017). Tres conceptos clave en medios digitales. Hipertext.net. Revista Académica sobre Documentación Digital y Comunicación Interactiva, 15, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.2436/20.8050.01.38
Suau, J. (2015). Citizens and online media participation. Attitudes and motivations towards participatory journalism and other practices in London and Barcelona [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Ramon Llull]. Universitat Ramon Llull. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/289347#page=1
Suau-Gomilla, G., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Jiménez-Pedraza, R. (2020). Politicians or influencers? Twitter profiles of Pablo Iglesias and Albert Rivera in the Spanish general elections of 20-D and 26-J. Communication & Society, 33(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.209-225
Vicari, S., Ianelli, L., & Zurovac, E. (2018). Political hashtag publics and counter-visibility: a case study of #fertilityday in Italy. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1235-1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555271
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
