Hacia un modelo de Metagobernanza para Gipuzkoa: El caso de Etorkizuna Eraikiz

Towards a Metagovernance model for Gipuzkoa: The case of Etorkizuna Eraikiz

Autores/as

  • Xabier Barandiaran University of Deusto

Resumen

El presente artículo está orientado al análisis y descripción del programa de gobierno Etorkizuna Eraikiz implementado por la Diputación Foral de Gipzukoa. Este artículo aborda este análisis desde un ejercicio reflexivo centrado en los conceptos de gobernanza y meta-gobernanza como manifestaciones de las nuevas condiciones para el ejercicio del buen gobierno y la competitividad territoriales. Etorkizuna Eraikiz se erige como el primer paso para el establecimiento organizado de las condiciones para una nueva gobernanza del territorio más colaborativa y abierta. El objetivo de este programa es visualizar y garantizar los mecanismos necesarios para la institucionalización de un nuevo sistema de deliberación compartida con la ciudadanía y los principales agentes e instituciones territoriales de Gipuzkoa, para afrontar sus principales retos de futuro.

Palabras clave: meta-gobernanza, gobernanza, innovación pública, Gipuzkoa, políticas públicas, competitividad territorial.

 

Abstract

The present article is focused on the analysis and description of the government program Etorkizuna Eraikiz implemented by the Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa in the Basque Country. This article approaches this analysis from a reflective exercise focused on the concepts of governance and meta-governance as manifestations of the new conditions for the exercise of good governance and territorial competitiveness. Etorkizuna Eraikiz stands as the first step for the organized establishment of the conditions for a new governance for a more collaborative and open territory. The objective of this program is to visualize and guarantee the necessary mechanisms for the institutionalization of a new system of shared deliberation with the citizens and the main agents and territorial institutions of Gipuzkoa to face their future socioeconomic challenges.

Keywords: meta-governance,  governance,  public  innovation,  gipuzkoa,  public  policies,  territorial competitiveness.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.18-1.1

 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative Public Management. New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Alexander, E. R. (1995). How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Co-ordination in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association.

Atkisnon, M. M., & Coleman, W. (1992). Policy Networks, policy communities, and the problems of Governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 5(2), 154-180.

Barlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2010). Public Sector Innovation and Entrepreneurship: case studies from local government. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 107-121.

Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-creting for a Better Society. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Beuir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borras, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of coordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185-208.

Bouckaert, G. (2012a). Trust and Public Administration. Administration, 60(1), 91-115.

–. (2012b). Reforming the Performance and Trust: Some Reflections. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 5(1), 9-20.

Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2009). Public Management and Governance. London: Routdlege.

Bukowski, J., Piattoni, S., & Smyrl, M. (Eds.). (2003). Between Europeanization and Local Societies: the space for territorial governance. Oxford, UK: Rowmen & Littlefield.

Camagni, R. (2002). On the concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Social or Misleading? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2395-2411.

Candy, P., C. (1991). Self-direction for Lifelong Learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: ERIC.

Castells, M. (1997). La Era de la Información. Vol 1. La Sociedad Red. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Christopoulos, S., Horvath, B., & Kull, M. (2012). Advancing the Governance of Cross-Sectoral Policies for Sustainable Development: A Metagovernace Perspective. Public Admistration and Development, 32(3), 305-323.

Crevoiser, O. (2004). The Innovative Milieus Approach: Toward a Territorialized understanding of the Economy? Economic Geography, 80(4), 367-379.

Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-death of Neo-Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.

Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., & Watamuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

Dickinson, R. E. (1964). City and Region: a geographical interpretation. London: Routdlege & Keagan Paul.

Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa, F. d. (2016). Plan Estratégico de Gestión 2015-2019. Donostia-San Sebastián: Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa.

Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and Complexity: Emerging Issues for Governance Theory. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 21(3), 311-335.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29.

Engberg, L. A., & Larsen, J. N. (2010). Context-oriented Meta-Governance in Danish Urban Regeneration. Planning Theory and Practice, 11(4), 549-571.

Estensoro, M., & Zurbano, M. (2010). La Innovación Social en la Gobernanza Territorial: Los casos de Innobasque y de las Redes Comarcales en el País Vasco. Ekonomiaz 74(160-177).

European, Commission. (2001). European governance: a white paper. Luxembourg.

Faludi, A. (2012). Multi-level (territorial) governance: Three criticisms. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 197-211.

Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (Eds.). (1996). The New Public Management in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and The New Educational Order. London: ERIC.

Foxell, S. (2015). Design as a Policy Tool. Building Research and Information, 43(4), 553-555.

Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is Governance? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 26(3), 347-368.

Giddens, A. (2006). La Constitución de la Sociedad: Bases para la teoría de la estructuración. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.

Gobierno Vasco. (2014). Informe sobre el análisis y funcionamiento institucional en la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Gobierno Vasco.

Harvey, D. (2007). Breve historia del neoliberalismo. Barcelona: Akal.

Jessop, B. (1998). The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29-45.

–. (2002). Governance and Metagovernace: On reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony from http://comp-lanes.au.uk/sociology/papers/Jessop-Governance-and-Metagorvernace.pdf

–. (2003). Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite, Variety and Irony. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as Social and Political Communication (pp. 142-172). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

–. (2004). Multilevel Governance and Multilevel Metagovernance. In I. Bach & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level Governance (pp. 49-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Bourgatti, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945.

Keating, M. (1997). The Invention of Regions: political re-estructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), 383-398.

Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Keating, M. (2002). Governing Ctities and Regions: Territorial Restructuring in a Global Age. In A. J. Scott (Ed.), Global City Regions. Trends, Theory and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge U.K.: Polity.

Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (Eds.). (2010). Open Government. Sebastopol: O'reilly.

Lechner, N. (1988). Los Patios Interiores de la Democracia: Subjetividad y Política. FLACSO: Santiago de Chile.

Lidström, A. (2007). Territorial Governance in Transition. Regional and Federal Studies, 17(4), 499-508.

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. Economic Development and Polictical Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1).

Loureau, R. (1979). El Estado y el Inconsciente. Barcelona: Editorial Kairos.

Luhmann, N. (1982). The World Society as a Global System. International Journal of General Systems, 8(3), 131-138.

–. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Luna, A. (2015). La Innovación de la Metrópoli: de Bilbao a Oresund y San Diego. Leioa: UPV/EHU.

Martin, R., Kitson, M., & Tyler, P. (Eds.). (2008). Regional Competitiveness. London & NY: Routdlege.

McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2002). New Public Management. Current trends and future prospects. . ondon & NY: Routdlege.

Meuleman, L. (2008). Public Managmenet and Metagovernace of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets. Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg.

Moulaert, F. (2000). Globalization and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.

Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302.

Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The Network Governance of Crises Response: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 19(4), 895-915.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the Public Sector. Retrieved from London.

O'Flynn, J., & Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative Governance: a new era of public policy in Australia? Canberra: ANU Press.

Osborne, S. P. (2008). The New Public Governance. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.

Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging theories on the theory and practice of Public Governance. New York: Routdlege.

Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469-486.

Penin, L., Staszowski, E., & Brown, S. (2015). Teaching the Next Generation of Transdisciplinary Thinkers and Practionners of Design-based Public and Social Innovation. Design and Culture. The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 7(3), 441-450.

Posner, R. A. (2010). The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy. Cambridge, M.A. : Harvard University Press.

Provan, K. G., & Kervis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure Managment and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.

–. (1997). Understanding Governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Maidehad, G.B.: Open University Press.

–. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(08), 1243-1264.

Richardson, T., & Jensen, O. B. (2003). Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies, 40(1), 7-22.

Robertson, R. (1995). Globalisation or Glocalization? The Journal of International Communication, 1(1), 33-52.

Sorensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The Changing Role of Politicians in the Process of Democratic Governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114.

Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of Network Governance. New York: Palgrave MacMillian.

–. (2012). Introduction: Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1).

Stoker, G. (1995). Regime Theory and Urban Politics. In David Judge, G. Stoker & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of Urban Politics (pp. 54-72). London: Sage Pubications.

Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Torfing, J., Peters, G., Pierre, J., & Sorensen, E. (2012). Interactive Governance. Advancing the Paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.

Valdaliso, J. M., & Wilson, J. R. (Eds.). (2015). Strategies for Shaping Territorial Competitiveness. NY: Routdlege.

Windrum, P., & Koch, P. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and Management. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

World Bank. (2000). Performing public institutions and strenghtening Governance. A world bank strategy. Washington D.C.

Descargas

Publicado

2018-11-02

Cómo citar

Barandiaran, X. (2018). Hacia un modelo de Metagobernanza para Gipuzkoa: El caso de Etorkizuna Eraikiz: Towards a Metagovernance model for Gipuzkoa: The case of Etorkizuna Eraikiz. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 3(1), 1–12. Recuperado a partir de https://epsir.net/index.php/epsir/article/view/95

Número

Sección

Artículos Portada