The usage of total knowledge by entrepreneurs in business decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1008Keywords:
Artifical Intelligence, cognitive biases, knowledge management, Entrepreneurs, decision-makingAbstract
Introduction: This paper proposes the identification of those attributes of knowledge that entrepreneurs consider most important in the process of making their business decisions. Methodology: This main objective is finally described by obtaining a ranking, which, through the application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), will allow them to establish their priorities with respect to these attributes through a multi-criteria decision process. In order to obtain this priority ranking, a survey with a sample of 362 valid entrepreneurs’ responses in the Spanish metropolitan regions of Madrid and Barcelona was conducted. Furthermore, data validation was supervised by a panel of experts formed with 40 entrepreneurs. Results: The results of this research indicate that explicit and tacit knowledge form the same unit of knowledge necessary for decision making, instead of the weight that one dimension may have over the other one in the decisions of the entrepreneurs surveyed. Discussions: The ranking obtained will serve as a basis for the implementation of future specific proposals to this group. Conclusions: This research could be extrapolated to other geographical areas or types of entrepreneurs in different countries to obtain possible differences between entrepreneurial cultures. This also could identificate differences between professionals with different levels of training.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., Shah, S. Z. A., & Abbass, Y. (2021). The role of heuristic-driven biases in entrepreneurial strategic decision-making: evidence from an emerging economy. Management Decision, 59(3), 669-691. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1231
Azimzadeh, A., Sanaeepour, H., Ashrafi, M., & Shojaei, S. (2021). Designing a model for the development of international entrepreneurship in knowledge-based businesses. Journal of Studies in Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Agricultural Development, 7(4), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.22069/jead.2021.19091.1479
Bharati, P. & Chaudhury, A. (2006). Studying the current status of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 49(10), 88-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1164394.1164400
Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (2008). Líderes. Estrategias para un liderazgo eficaz. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
Bigelow, L. S., & Barney, J. B. (2020). What can Strategy Learn from the Business Model Approach? Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 528-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12579
Boyatzis, R., & Mc Kee, A. (2005). Liderazgo Emocional. Harvard Business School Press.
Bratianu, C., Nestian, A. S., Tita, S. M., Vodģ, A. I., & Guta, A. L. (2020). The Impact of Knowledge Risk on Sustainability of Firms. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 639. https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2020/55/63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/639
Brînzea, N. (2022). Emotional intelligence, the ability to access or generate feelings. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 36(1), 570-575. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v36i1.7466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v36i1.7466
Butt, M.A., Nawaz, F., Hussain, S., Sousa, M. J., Wang, M., Sumbal, M. S., & Shujahat, M. (2019). Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 25(3), 336-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9270-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9270-z
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2019). Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 139, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005
Castellani, P., Rossato, C., Giaretta, E., & Davide, R. (2021). Tacit knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive firms: the perceptions of team members and team leaders. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 125-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00368-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00368-x
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Ahktar, R. (2023). 3 Human super talents AI will not replace. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/05/3-human-super-talents-ai-will-not-replace
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2018). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098
De la Cuesta, M., Gázquez, J. D. P., Holgado-Tello, F. P., & Barbero-García, M. I. (2014). Métodos de Escalamiento en la Obtención de Evidencias de Validación de Contenido: La Construcción de una Escala para Evaluar Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11822
De la Puente, M. (2010). Gestión del conocimiento y Minería de datos. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14884
Drucker, P. F. (2009). The Essential Drucker: The Best of Sixty Years of Peter Drucker's Essential Writings on Management. Collins Business Essentials.
Expansión-Diario Económico. (2019). PIB-Producto Interior Bruto Comunidades Autónomas. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/pib/espana-comunidades-autonomas
Fonseca-Feris, R., & Fleitas-Alvarez, V. C. (2020). Small and medium-size companies in Paraguay. Limitations for its internationalization. Revista Internacional de Investigación En Ciencias Sociales, 16(2), 294-311. https:// doi.org/10.18004/riics.2020.diciembre.294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18004/riics.2020.diciembre.294
Frishammar, J. (2003). Information use in strategic decision making. Management Decision, 41(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310468090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310468090
Gamble, J. R. (2020). Tacit vs explicit knowledge as antecedents for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(6), 1123-1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-04-2020-0121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2020-0121
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190
Giner, V. (2015). Factores emocionales del conocimiento que influyen sobre la objetividad del diagnóstico de la situación en el proceso de planificación estratégica [Tesis de Doctorado,] Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. http://hdl.handle.net/10115/13726
Goleman, D. (2003). Leadership that gets results. In A. Hooper (Ed.), Leadership Perspectives (pp. 85-96). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250601-9
Goleman, D., & Boyatzis, R. (2017). Emotional intelligence has 12 elements. Which do you need to work on. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 1-5.
Grant, R.M. (2012). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022
Hermann, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective. New Media & Society, 24(5), 1258-1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211022702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211022702
Hills, T. T. (2019). The Dark Side of Information Proliferation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618803647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618803647
Jiang, C., Wang, Z., Wang, R., & Ding, Y. (2017). Loan default prediction by combining soft information extracted from descriptive text in online peer-to-peer lending. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1-2), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2668-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2668-z
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kour, J., El-Den, J., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2019). The Role of Positive Psychology in Improving Employees’ Performance and Organizational Productivity: An Experimental Study. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.118
Lazazzara, A., & Za, S. (2020). The effect of subjective age on knowledge sharing in the public sector. Personnel Review, 49(1), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2018-0248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2018-0248
Liberti, J. M., & Petersen, M. A. (2018). Information: Hard and Soft. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 8(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfy009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfy009
Manley, N. A. L. (2022). The Importance of Tacit Knowledge in Geoscience Brought to the Surface through Artistic Methods. Art Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 123-155. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29571
Manoochehri, M. (2021). Up to the magical number seven: An evolutionary perspective on the capacity of short term memory. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06955
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
Minsky, L., & Aron, D. (2021). Are You Doing the SWOT Analysis Backwards? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/02/are-you-doing-the-swot-analysis-backwards
Mitchell, V. W., Harvey, W. S., & Wood, G. (2021). Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1664-1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1937066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1937066
Moreno, J. M. (2002). El proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP), fundamentos, metodología y aplicaciones. Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA, 1(Extra 1), 1-25.
Morley, J., Kinsey, L., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Ziosi, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Operationalising AI ethics: barriers, enablers and next steps. AI & Society, 38(1), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001
Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M., Autry, C. W., & Bond, E. U. (2004). Dual‐perspective SWOT: a synthesis of marketing intelligence and planning. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500410516931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500410516931
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ramge, T., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2023). Using ChatGPT to Make Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/08/using-chatgpt-to-make-better-decisions
Rantapuska, T., & Ihanainen, O. (2008). Knowledge use in ICT investment decision making of SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(6), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390810911195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390810911195
Rodríguez-Castellanos, A., & San-Martin-Albizuri, N. (2020). Covid-19, globalización, complejidad e incertidumbre: algunas reflexiones sobre gestión empresarial en tiempos de crisis y más allá. Revista GEON (Gestión, Organizaciones Y Negocios), 7(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.219
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Shih, H. (2022). Subjective Geometry for Problem Modeling in the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Processes. International Journal of The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i2.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i2.1012
Sikombe, S., Phiri, M. A., & Wright, L. T. (2019). Exploring tacit knowledge transfer and innovation capabilities within the buyer–supplier collaboration: a literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1683130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1683130
Soyer, E., & Robin, H. (2020). The Myth of Experience: Why We Learn the Wrong Lessons, and Ways to Correct Them. Public Affairs.
Stokes, M. (1992). Socrates’ mission. In B. Gower & M. Stokes (Eds.), Socratic Questions, New Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates and its Significance (pp. 26-81). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450136-2
Thomas, A., & Gupta, V. (2021). Social Capital Theory, Social Exchange Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, Financial Literacy, and the Role of Knowledge Sharing as a Moderator in Enhancing Financial Well-Being: From Bibliometric Analysis to a Conceptual Framework Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638
Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium‐sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal Of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x
Viguri, J. (2011). La intuición en la toma de decisiones. Decisiones en situaciones de riesgo. Análisis de la función de utilidad [Tesis de doctorado]. Universidad Antonio de Nebrija.
Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. (2005). Desarrollo de Habilidades Directivas. Pearson Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dulce Saldaña-Larrondo; Vicente Giner-Crespo (Autor de Correspondencia); Alberto Azuara-Grande
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).