Figures of subsidiary production in Spanish contemporary art

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1717

Keywords:

art, production, technology, fabricators, artist, authorship, work, visibility

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this work is to evaluate the relevance of subsidiary production in plastic art in Spain. An activity scarcely studied and recognized. Methodology: The study follows the qualitative research criteria outlined in the in-depth and semi-structured interview. The consultation with four art producers covers five items grouped into two thematic blocks; the relationship with the artist, the relationship with the work. Results: They show the close relationships between artists and manufacturers, consolidated over time and commercially based, which appear to be indispensable to addressing a production of artistic quality and technological complexity. Discussions: It is framed in the context of the consequences of the technologization of art and the interdependence between creativity and the market and the prominence of technical mediations in the construction of artistic reputation. Conclusions: The importance and relevance of these figures is manifested in how the activity of these technicians substantially affects the work of fundamental artists of our artistic panorama such as, for example, Juan Muñoz, Miquel Barceló, Cristina Iglesias, or artists from younger generations such as Dionisio Gonzalez, Jacobo Castellanos, Carlos Irijalba, among others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pedro Galván Lamet, ESIC University

Doctor in Fine Arts, graduate in Art History from the U.A.M. and Master in Research, Art and Creation from the U.C.M. He has worked as a set designer for the National Classical Theatre. His work in Collective Art forms part of the collection of the Museo Arte Reina Sofía in Madrid. His line of research focuses on various fields related to art, production, technology, gender gap, terrorism. He is co-author of the books ‘On Music, Money and Markets: Comparing the Finances of Great Composers’, ‘Springer “, ”Lawrence of Arabia. The 60th Anniversary Book’ and “Anthropology; A Guide to Thinking the Human”. Since 2004 he has been a lecturer at ESIC, where he teaches Creativity, History and Anthropology.

References

Alpha-Arte (s.f.). Inicio. https://alfaarte.com/

Becker, H. (2008). Los mundos del arte: sociología del trabajo artístico. Prometeo.

Benveniste, D. (s.f.). https://www.benveniste.com/

Bourdieu, P. (1995). Las reglas del arte. Anagrama.

Factum – Arte (s.f.). Inicio. https://www.factum-arte.com/es/inicio

Galván Lamet, P. (2012). La figura del fabricator en los procesos técnicos de arte contemporáneo. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Complutense Madrid, Repositorio institucional U.C.M. https://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/5d1df62329995204f7662671

Graw, I. (2015). ¿Cuánto vale el arte? Mardulce.

Labaco, R. (2013). Out of Hand: Materializing in the Postdigital. Black Dog Publisihing.

Lipovetsky, G. y Serroy, J. (2015). La estetización del mundo. Anagrama.

Neira, C. (2013). La estampación es un ejercicio para un artista, como un escáner cerebral. Diario Nueva España. bit.ly/3S4LcB3

Petry, M. (2011). The Art of not Making: The New Artist/Artisan Relationship. Thames and Hudson.

Polanco, R. (2009). Rubén Polanco [video]. Youtube. bit.ly/3WhfPWj

Mc Andrew, C. (2023). The art market 2023. Art Basel and UBS. file:///http /art-market-report-twenty-three.pdf

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Galván Lamet, P. (2024). Figures of subsidiary production in Spanish contemporary art. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1717

Issue

Section

INNOVATING IN ARTISTIC FORMULATIONS