El modelo de participación de stakeholders de Mitchell, Agle y Wood: una aproximación desde las instituciones de educación superior públicas

Lorenzo Adalid Armijos Robles

doi:10.31637/epsir-2025-1985

Authors

Lorenzo Adalid Armijos Robles Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2589-7155

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1985

Keywords:

stakeholders, stakeholder models, stakeholder theory, link management model, Mitchell Agle and Wood model, public higher education institutions, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, strategic planning

Abstract

Introduction: The management of links with stakeholders has gained relevance over time becoming a fundamental task for any organization that seeks to maintain an effective and sustainable relationship with its environment. Methodology: In this research, an exploratory approach with qualitative and quantitative methods was used. The Mitchell, Agle and Wood model was applied to rank the stakeholders of the National Polytechnic School (Public University of Quito-Ecuador); the detailed links in each interest group are highlighted and the stakeholders were classified according to several attributes. Results: the usefulness of the models was evidenced, for the management of stakeholders in accordance with the links they have with the educational institution analyzed. Seventeen key stakeholders were identified. Discussion: the model proved to be effective in classifying stakeholders and addressing institutional challenges such as financing, infrastructure and educational quality. Adapting the model to the university context allowed for a more accurate assessment of stakeholder relationships. Conclusions: The research enabled a consistent survey of the stakeholders of the mentioned university, which will promote transparency and active participation of the stakeholders, contributing to the success and sustainability of the university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lorenzo Adalid Armijos Robles, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE

PhD in Management Sciences from the National University of La Plata (Argentina), Senior Lecturer I of the Department of Economic, Administrative and Commercial Sciences of the University of the Armed Forces ESPE, since 2005. Former lecturer at the Faculty of Economics of the Central University of Ecuador (2002-2013), and at the International University of Ecuador (UIDE), from 2014 to 2016. Professional qualifications: Odessa State Agrarian University. He is an Engineer and Economist. Postgraduate studies: Specialist in Technology and Environmental Management (National Polytechnic School), Executive Master in Technology and Environmental Management, by the School of Industrial Organization of Spain E. O. I. Author and co-author of the book ‘The Environmental Management and Technology of the Environment’. Author and co-author of several articles and books. Currently: General Editor of the digital magazine of the University: TAMBARA.

References

Acuña, A. (2012). La gestión de los stakeholders, análisis de los diferentes modelos. Grupo de Investigación RSE y Sistemas de Información de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. https://acortar.link/wqgKvE

Baro, M. (2011). Jerarquización de stakeholders para la construcción del capital social de las organizaciones. Mediaciones sociales, 9, 135-162. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_MESO.2011.n9.38013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_MESO.2011.n9.38013

Capriotti, P. (2013). En Planificación estratégica de la Imagen Corporativa. Instituto de Investigación en Relaciones Públicas. https://acortar.link/z1qyI6

Falção, H. y Rubens, J. (1999). En quién se pone el Foco - ¿En quién se pone el foco? Identificando “stakeholders” para la formulación de la misión organizacional. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 15. https://acortar.link/3B9o5C

Bermeo, J., Feijoo, I. y López, M. (2018). Segmentación de mercado. En Gestión de proyectos editoriales universitarios (Ed.), Marketing aplicado en el sector empresarial (pp. 31-46). Ediciones UTIMACH. https://acortar.link/q0U5U1

Fernández, J. y Bajo, A. (2012). La Teoría del Stakeholder o de los Grupos de Interés, pieza clave de la RSE, del éxito empresarial y de la sostenibilidad. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Comunicación aDResearch ESIC. 6(6). 130-143. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3980299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7263/ADRESIC.006.06

Freeman, R. y Mcvea, J. (2001). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic journal, 1. https://acortar.link/jPyplU DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Gaete, R. (2012). Gobierno universitario pluralista. Una propuesta de análisis desde la teoría de los stakeholders. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 9(2), 115-129. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78023425010

Galvão, M., Corrêa, R. y Gonçalves, L. (2009). Stakeholder Management and Organizational Sustainability: a Brazilian Case Study from the forest sector. RAC, Curitiba, 13, 39-52. https://acortar.link/wmXsuL

Giordano, D. (2017). Ponderación de los stakeholders de la biblioteca nacional durante la gestión 2008-2015. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires]. Biblioteca digital. https://acortar.link/Xnbggv

Hallahan, K. (2000). Inactive publics: the forgotten publics in public relations*. Public Relations Review, 26(4), 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00061-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00061-8

IESE Business School. (2009). La evolución del concepto de Stakeholder en los escritos de Ed Freeman. Newsletter, 5, 1-14. https://acortar.link/GNHiJI

Mañay, A. (2015). Análisis de la comunicación en crisis en los sectores afectador por la nueva ley de sustitución de importaciones en el sector distribuidor de insumos. Estudio de caso, “Mega Santa María S.A.”. [Tesis de grado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial]. Repositorio Institucional. https://acortar.link/aZ0rke

Milosevic, D., Mitchell R. y Wood, D. (2018). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 853-886. https://acortar.link/ENpNlY

Mitchell, R., Agle, B. y Wood, D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259247

Morales. (2019, 7 de Febrero). Matriz de prominencia, una herramienta para priorizar a los stakeholders. Informática & Coaching. https://acortar.link/4mjmel

Moreno, P. R. (2015). Los Stakeholders y la Responsabilidad Social empresarial. En Fundación Instituto Iberoamericano de Mercados de Valores (IIMV) (Eds.), El Gobierno Corporativo en Iberoamérica (pp. 477-538). Proyectos Editoriales S.A. https://acortar.link/b7eoTv

Navarro, F. (2008). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa: teoría y Práctica. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración, 193-195. https://acortar.link/0DRm02

Rawlins, B. (2006). Priorización de las partes interesadas para las relaciones públicas. Instituto de Relaciones Públicas. https://acortar.link/iEbbCT

Uribe A. y Requena, R. (2013). Consideraciones del enfoque stakeholder. Punto de Vista, 4(7), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v4i7.442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v4i7.442

Viera, E. y Hoffmann, V. (2006). Práticas de sustentabilidade ambiental para empreendimentos turísticos hoteleiros: aplicação de um modelo. Universidad de Caxias do Sul – Mestrado em Turismo. https://acortar.link/hhDsiN

Zárate, R., Beltrán, Y. y González, C. (2020). Relación con los stakeholders en el marco de la responsabilidad social empresarial. Revista Espacios, 41(32), 211-226. https://ww.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n32/a20v41n32p20.pdf