From compass to radar: An innovative methodological strategy for researching cultural innovation
De la brújula al radar: Una estrategia metodológica innovadora para investigar la innovación cultural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2022-201Keywords:
innovación cultural, innovación metodológica, giro onto-epistemológico, proceso de investigación lineal, proceso de investigación procesualAbstract
Ante la falta de una reflexión profunda sobre innovación metodológica, este artículo se propone abordar la estrategia más adecuada para investigar la innovación cultural. En este sentido, subyace en este artículo una revisión conceptual de dos términos clave: cultura e innovación. El primero se expande hacia visiones más abiertas y creativas, y el segundo, se redefine desde una conceptualización lineal y acumulativa hacia un proceso abierto y creativo. Para construir un nuevo enfoque metodológico a partir de esta revisión, presentamos un giro onto-epistemológico que implica pasar de un proceso de investigación en progresión lineal, a un proceso de investigación cultural innovador entendido como un evento procesual, relacional y performativo. A modo de conclusión, el artículo propone un dispositivo de investigación creativo e innovador, abierto a las múltiples configuraciones en las que individuos y grupos habitan, construyen y experimentan la cultura de forma innovadora.
Downloads
References
Abad Miguélez, B., & Davila Legerén, A. (2020). Infortunio de la investigación social cualitativa en la era del capitalismo académico. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.82-95
Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512
Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20(Winter, 1991-1992), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221
Alexander, B. K. (2013). “Etnografía performativa. La representación y la incitación de la cultura”. In Norman K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Comps.), Manual de Investigación Cualitativa (Volumen III, pp. 94-153). Editorial Gedisa.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
Barnett, A. (2014). The Creative Analytic Paradigm and Generative Social Research within the Context of the Early-Years/Kindergarten Physical Learning Environment. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 283-290. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/2/5/8/index.html
Benozzo, A., Bell, H., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2013). Moving Between Nuisance, Secrets, and Splinters as Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487878
Braidotti, R. (2015). Lo posthumano. Editorial Gedisa.
Carrasco Segovia, S., & Castro Varela, A. (2020). Más allá de la máquina antropocéntrica: hacia una educación e investigación posthumanistas (pp. 67-81). In J. M. Sancho Gil, F. Hernández Hernández, L. Montero Mesa, J. de Pablos Pons, J. I. Rivas Flores & A. Ocaña Fernández (Coords.) Caminos y derivas para otra investigación educativa y social. Editorial Octaedro.
Childers, S. M. (2012). Against Simplicity, Against Ethics: Analytics of Disruption as Quasi-Methodology Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 752-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453015
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [trans. Brian Massumi]. University of Minnesota Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). The call to performance. Symbolic Interaction, 26(1), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.1.187
Dewsbury, J. D. (2000). Performativity and the event: enacting a philosophy of difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 473-496. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/d200t
Greene, J. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
Haraway, D. (1999). Las promesas de los monstruos: una política regeneradora para otros inapropiados/bles, Política y sociedad, 30, 121-163 [Translated by Elena Casado. Reproduced with the permission of Routledge, Inc., from C. Nelson, P. Treichíer and L. Orossberg (Eds.), (1991), Cultural Studies. London and New York] https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO9999130121A
Hustak C., & Myers, N. (2012). Involutionary momentum: Affective ecologies and the sciences of plant/insect encounters. Differences, 23(3), 74-118. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892907
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research. Methodologies without Methodology. Sage Publications.
Krehl, M., Thomas, E., & Bellingham, R. (2020). The vitality of theory in research innovation. In M. Krehl, E. Thomas & R. Bellingham (Eds.), Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies (pp. 1-16). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lasén, A., & Casado, E. (2014). Mediaciones tecnológicas. Cuerpos, afectos y subjetividades. Universidad Complutense y Centro de Investigaciones sociológicas.
Lather, P. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. In A. Jackson & L. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: challenging conventional, interpretive and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17-26). Routledge.
Law, J. (2004). After Method. Mess in social science research. Routledge.
Lupton, D. (2021). ‘Things that matter’: poetic inquiry and more-than-human health literacy. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1690564
Mannay, D., & Morgan, M. (2015). Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the “waiting field”. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 166-182. https://acortar.link/njs0Cf
Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788756
Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
Merton, R. K. (1948). The bearing of empirical research upon the development of social theory. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087142
Michael, M. (2012). De-signing the object of sociology: toward an ‘idiotic’ methodology. The Sociological Review, 60(S1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02122.x
Pacho, J. (2009). La paradoja de la innovación. Aspectos axiológicos y espistémico-culturales. In M. J. Maidagán, I. Ceberio, L. Garagalza & G. Arrizabalaga (Eds.), Filosofía de la Innovación. El papel de la creatividad en un mundo global (pp. 13-44). Editorial Plaza y Valdés.
Piazuelo Lamote de Grignon, C., & YProductions. (2008). Innovación en Cultura: Una Aproximación Crítica a la Genealogía y Usos del Concepto. YProductions.
Raquejo, T. (2020). Caminar con arte. Mapas colectivos del entorno. In T. Raquejo (Coord.), El arte de corporeizar el entorno. Prácticas artísticas para una pedagogía del sentir (pp. 155-172). Editorial Aula Magna, McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
Salazar, N. B. (2022). Anthropologies of the Present and the Presence of Anthropology. Etnografia. 2(16), 6-24. https://acortar.link/bBJrtT
Shumack, K., & Tuckwell, J. (2010). Mapping as Assemblage for Cultural Research. University of Western Sydney, Institute for Culture and Society. Occasional Paper Series, 1(5), 1-18. https://acortar.link/hAtoTN
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins UP.
Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.
St. Pierre, E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278
Taylor, C., & Coffey, A. (2008). Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: Possibilities and Challenges. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Paper 121, 1-25. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/78184/1/wp121.pdf
Torrance, H. (2019). Data as Entanglement: New Definitions and Uses of Data in Qualitative Research, Policy, and Neoliberal Governance. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418807239
Vannini, Ph. (2015). Non-Representational Methodologies. Re-Envisioning Research. Routledge.
Wentzer, T. S., & Mattingly, C. (2018). Toward a new humanism: An approach from philosophical anthropology. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1–2), 144-157. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/698361
Wiles, R., Pain, H., & Crow G. (2010). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. University of Southampton; ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. NCRM Working Paper Series 03/10, 1-32. https://acortar.link/SgQfmM
Woolgar, S. (1991). Ciencia: abriendo la caja negra. Anthropos Editorial.
Youngblood Jackson, A. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788762
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
