Impacto del aula invertida en la construcción del conocimiento en educación superior

Silvia Verónica Valdivia Yábar; Liceli Gabriela Peñarrieta Bedoya; Tania Roxana Aguilar Portugal

doi:10.31637/epsir-2024-351

Authors

Silvia Verónica Valdivia Yábar Universidad Nacional del Altiplano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9665-5022
Liceli Gabriela Peñarrieta Bedoya Universidad Nacional del Altiplano https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-8564
Tania Roxana Aguilar Portugal Universidad Nacional del Altiplano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-1401

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-351

Keywords:

flipped classroom, higher education, didactic methodology, active learning, mesogenesis, chronogenesis, topogenesis, university pedagogy

Abstract

Introduction: With the advancement of information technologies, higher education has adopted the flipped classroom, varying between Anglo-Saxon and European perspectives, which define educational roles and spaces. The aim of the study was to specify how the flipped classroom model reconfigures the spaces-times, and roles of the involved actors. Methodology: A quatitative approach and explanatory research with a field design were adopted, and non directive interviews were conducted with nine university teachers in Peru using non-directive interviews. Results: Personal experiences and interactions with students proved crucial for the adoption of the model, identifying two ideal configurations: one dominated by teacher control and another that favors student autonomy. Discussions: The analysis focuses on how these two ideal types relate to the didactic triplet of mesogenesis, chronogenesis, and topogenesis, suggesting that the flipped classroom allows for a flexible redistribution of roles and teaching-learning times. Conclusions: The flipped classroom significantly modifies the dynamics of space-time and the roles of actors in the teaching-learning process in higher education. This model adapts to the individual needs of students and enhances the effectiveness of knowledge construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Silvia Verónica Valdivia Yábar, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano

PhD in Pedagogy, with Honourable Mention, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Master's Degree in Linguistics, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Peru (UNA). Bachelor's Degree in Education (UNA). Researcher recognised by CONCYTEC, Peru, with several funded research projects. Research professor at the Universidad Nacional del Altiplano (UNA) with more than 15 years of experience in teaching and research. Research interests: Pedagogy, Educational Policies, Interculturality and Linguistics. Active member of the Mexican Society of Comparative Education (SOMEC) and participant in international conferences. He has published articles in indexed journals in Spain, Mexico, Brazil, USA and Costa Rica, contributing significantly to the field of education and linguistics.

Liceli Gabriela Peñarrieta Bedoya, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano

PhD in Education, National University of the Altiplano, Peru (UNA). Master's in Social Communication, with a specialization in Communication and Education, from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile (UC). Bachelor's degree in Social Communication Sciences (UNA). She has completed a second specialty in Project-Based Learning at the Catholic University of San Pablo. Psychologist. She is currently pursuing a Master’s in Psychology of Knowledge and Learning at FLACSO Argentina. She has conducted research and published on topics in educational psychology, communication for development, and social psychology. She is a tenured professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Social Communication Sciences, at the National University of the Altiplano, with more than 15 years of experience in teaching and research.

Tania Roxana Aguilar Portugal, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano

PhD in Medicine, National University of San Agustin de Arequipa, Peru (UNSA). PhD in Education, National University of the Altiplano, Peru (UNA). Master's in Medicine, National University of San Agustin de Arequipa, Peru. Specialty in Pediatrics, National University of the Altiplano, Peru. Surgeon, National University of the Altiplano, Peru. Tenured professor at the Faculty of Medicine, National University of the Altiplano, with more than 15 years of experience in teaching and research. Has published articles in indexed journals in Brazil and Peru.

References

Abeysekera, L. y Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336

Baillet, D., Kahn, S. y Rey, B. (2021). Les savoirs enseignés à l’université: Une piste pour saisir les difficultés d’apprentissage rencontrées par les étudiants de première année? Revue française de Pédagogie, 210, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.10018

Bergmann, J. y Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. https://bit.ly/3W7K7uA

Clot, Y. y Faïta, D. (2000). Genres et styles en analyse du travail: Concepts et méthodes. Travailler, 4, 7-42. https://bit.ly/3W6BYqp

Coenen-Huther, J. (2003). Le type idéal comme instrument de la recherche sociologique. Revue Française de Sociologie, 44(3), 531-547. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323206

De Certeau, M. (1996). La invención de lo cotidiano: Artes de hacer (Vol. 1). Universidad Iberoamericana. https://bit.ly/4cs0FDx

Detroz, P. y Verpoorten, D. (2016). Comment expliquer l’adoption de la méthodologie des classes inversées en enseignement supérieur? In A. Dumont, y D. Berthiaume (Eds.), La pédagogie inversée. Enseigner autrement dans le supérieur avec la classe inversée (pp. 177-201). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dumon.2022.01.0201

Dumont, A. y Berthiaume, D. (2016). Introduction. In A. Dumont, y D. Berthiaume (Eds.), La pédagogie inversée. Enseigner autrement dans le supérieur avec la classe inversée (pp. 7-12). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/om.181.0005

Flores, O., Del-Arco, I. y Silva, P. (2016). The flipped classroom model at the university: Analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0022-1

Fulton, K. (2012). The flipped classroom: Transforming education at Byron High School: A Minnesota high school with severe budget constraints enlisted YouTube in its successful effort to boost math competency scores. T.H.E. Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 39(3), 18-20.

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S. y Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O. y Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J. y Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759

Lebrun, M. (2016). La classe inversée au confluent de différentes tendances dans un contexte mouvant. In A. Dumont y D. Berthiaume (Eds.), La pédagogie inversée. Enseigner autrement dans le supérieur avec la classe inversée (pp. 13-38). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dumon.2022.01.0015

Long, T., Logan, J. y Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. Tech Trends, 60, 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4

Merriam, S. B. y Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

O'Flaherty, J. y Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications. https://bit.ly/45QKrRI

Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170-183). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243

Sensevy, G. (2011). Le sens du savoir. Éléments pour une théorie de l'action conjointe en didactique. De Boeck.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4

Talbert, R. y Bergmann, J. (2017). Flipped learning: A guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Zainuddin, Z. y Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274