Experiences of gender in the laboratory, fieldwork for career choice in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics (STEAM)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-372

Keywords:

students, vocation, steam, higher education, gender, science, engineering, mathematics

Abstract

Introduction: University education offers opportunities for work and personal development, highlighting the importance of scientific and technological vocation to prepare competent professionals in the 21st century. Methodology: A non-experimental methodology with descriptive and comparative analysis was used. The study covered various engineering faculties and institutes of the UABC, with a sample of 738 students. Results: The results indicate a similar perception between men and women, but a marked gender disparity in participation in engineering careers. Discussion: The gender bias in engineering careers is significant, highlighting the need to encourage girls' vocation towards science. Conclusions: It is crucial to reinforce practices that encourage girls' scientific and technological vocation in order to change the perception that women have less to offer in STEAM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marja Johana López Quintero, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

She is a lecturer in the area of agribusiness at the Institute of Agricultural Engineering of the Autonomous University of Baja California, PhD student in science, research interests include higher education, educational systems, STEAM education, modern educational methodologies, teaching and university students.

Jose Luis Arcos Vega, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

Professor and researcher involved in publications in the area of technological innovation, strategic management and process quality, higher education, science and technology, conferences and book chapters and articles for more than 25 years in the sector, evaluator in strategic management and technological innovation, education and finance and improvement techniques and methods to evaluate processes in industry. Research interests in management, quality, engineering higher education, finance and science and technology (STEAM).

Maria Amparo Oliveros Ruiz, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

D. in Science from the Autonomous University of Baja California, full time professor at the Faculty of Pedagogy and Educational Innovation, Mexicali campus of the Autonomous University of Baja California. Her research interests are: science education, STEAM education.

References

Alarcón Montiel, E. (2019). Elección de carrera: motivos, procesos e influencias y sus efectos en la experiencia estudiantil de jóvenes universitarios de alto rendimiento académico. REencuentro. Análisis de Problemas Universitarios, 30(77), 53-74. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34065218004

Ashcraft, C., McLain, B. y Eger, E. (2016). Women in Tech: The facts. Ncwit’s Workforce Alliance. https://bit.ly/3jONgdf

Avendaño Rodríguez, K. C., Magaña Medina, D. E. y Flores Crespo, P. (2020). Influencia familiar en la elección de carreras STEM (Ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas) en estudiantes de bachillerato. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(2), 515-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.366311

Cabero Almenara, J. y Valencia Ortiz, R. (2021). STEM y género: un asunto no resuelto. REVIE-Revista de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 8(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.47554/revie2021.8.86

Camacho, A., García Peñalvo, F., García Holgadp, A., García, L. y Peñabaena, R. (2021). Construyendo el futuro de Latinoamérica: mujeres en STEM. Encuentro Internacional de Educación en Ingeniería. https://doi.org/10.26507/ponencia.1847

Carrasco Salazar, E. y Valenzuela Vidal, D. (2021). Mujeres que eligen ciencias: autoeficacia, expectativas de resultado, barreras y apoyos percibidos para la elección de carrera universitaria. Calidad en la Educación, 54, 271-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n54.994

Chen, C., Said, T., Sadler, P. M., Perry, A. y Sonnert, G. (2024). The impact of high school science pedagogies on students' STEM career interest and on their ratings of teacher quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21948

Cifuentes, A. P. y Caplan, M. (2019). Experiencias de educación STEM en el ámbito formal y rural. En Moreno, N. (1 Ed.). Educación STEM/STEAM: Apuestas hacia la formación, impacto y proyección de seres críticos (27-39). Fondo Editorial Universitario Servando Garcés de la Universidad Politécnica Territorial de Falcón Alonso Gamero. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8093331

Condori Mamani, F. (2023). Relevancia de la orientación profesional. Revista de Investigación Psicológica, 29, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.53287/jhdt6474qo36t

Doña Toledo, L. y Luque Martínez, T. (2019). La experiencia universitaria. Análisis de factores motivacionales y sociodemográficos. Revista de la educación superior, 48(191), 1-24. https://bitly.cx/CgEj

Domènech Casal, J. (2019). STEM: Oportunidades y retos desde la Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 2, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2019.2

Eck, C. J., Rankin, K., y Robinson, J. S. (2023). Purposeful STEM Integration in School-Based Agricultural Education Programs. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1128

Duke Escobar, V. G., Torres Sigüenza, J. O., García Perdido, M. U. y Toledo Martínez, C. S. T. (2021). Factores que inciden en la elección de carreras STEM en la educación universitaria de El Salvador. Anuario de Investigación: Universidad Católica de El Salvador, 10, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.5377/aiunicaes.v10i1.12487

Farias-Escalera, A. y Escalón-Portilla, E. (2022). ‘Presentación de modelos femeninos en ciencia y tecnología a niñas y jóvenes para el fomento de vocaciones científicas: una estrategia de comunicación de la ciencia en el INECOL, México.’. JCOM – América Latina, 5(01), N03. https://doi.org/10.22323/3.05010803

Godwin, A., Sonnert, G. y Sadler, P. M. (2015), The Influence of Out-of-school High School Experiences on Engineering Identities and Career Choice Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24889

Horta, H. y Tang, L. (2023). Gender inequality and bias in Chinese universities: perceptions of male and female academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(8), 1954–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197193

Lorenzo Rial. M., Álvarez-Lires., F., Álvarez-Lires., M. y Serrallé-Marzoa., J. (2016). La amenaza del estereotipo: elección de estudios de ingeniería y educación tecnocientífica. Opción, 32(9), 54–76. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5891154

Moreno-Díaz, C., Alía, C., Ocaña, R., Caja, J., Maresca, P., Narbón, J., Nuere, M., Sanchidrian, A. y Gómez, F. (2019). Fomento de vocaciones tecnológicas en niños y jóvenes a través de laboratorios de fabricación (Fab Labs) [ponencia]. En ACTAS Vigesimoséptimo Congreso Universitario de Innovación Educativa en las Enseñanzas Técnicas Alcoy, Valencia, España. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7688185

Naciones Unidas (2018). Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible. https://bitly.cx/Lw7

OECD (2019), Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.

Pérez, I., Macias G. G. y Caldera, J. F. (2021). Motivos de elección de carreras universitarias por parte de estudiantes de bachillerato en México. Un estudio comparativo desde una perspectiva de género. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 14, 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021

Rodríguez Muñiz, L. J., Areces Martínez, D., Suárez Álvarez, J., Cueli, M. y Muñiz, J. (2019). ¿Qué motivos tienen los estudiantes de Bachillerato para elegir una carrera universitaria?. Revista de Psicología y Educación. 14(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2019.01.167

Santos Ramos, M. G. y Miguel Aguilar, M. R. (2021). Un proyecto de intervención para el desarrollo del talento en Matemáticas para niñas con edades entre 12 y 16 años. Educação Matemática Debate, 5(11), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.46551/emd.e202124

Vázquez-Alonso, A. y Manassero-Mas, M. A. (2015). La elección de estudios superiores científico-técnicos: análisis de algunos factores determinantes en seis países. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 12(2), 264-277. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/17251

Downloads

Published

2024-07-24

How to Cite

López Quintero, M. J., Arcos Vega, J. L., & Oliveros Ruiz, M. A. (2024). Experiences of gender in the laboratory, fieldwork for career choice in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics (STEAM). European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-372

Issue

Vol. 9 (2024)

Section

INNOVATING IN GENDER CONCEPT

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Marja Johana López Quintero, Jose Luis Arcos Vega, Maria Amparo Oliveros Ruiz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).