Work context and gender, differentiators of leadership style

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-420

Keywords:

managerial styles, gender, organisational context, leadership, occupation, competitiveness, stereotyping

Abstract

Introduction: The influence of gender on leadership styles is a complex issue. Historically, gender stereotypes have been perpetuated, associating men with traits such as assertiveness, decisiveness and competitiveness; and women with qualities such as empathy, collaboration and affection. The aim of this study is to analyse types of leadership and the ability to apply it to different situations according to the variables of type of work and gender. Methodology: A descriptive non-experimental cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 617 people. The LJI-2 scale was applied. Leadership Judgement Indicator scale was used to assess four leadership styles and the ability to apply it to different situations. Results: Differences were found between men and women in terms of the type of company and level of education. Significant differences were found in the management styles, the directive, consultative and delegatory styles among men, and consensual among women. Of note is the negative correlation, in women, between directive and delegatory styles Discussion: individual leadership styles are influenced by an interaction of personal experiences, cultural norms and organisational contexts. Conclusions: Differences in leadership style are observed as a function of gender and types of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carla Bueno de la Fuente, University of Burgos

Graduate in Law and Criminology. Doctoral candidate at the University of Burgos (Spain). Master in Legal Tech and Energy Regulation from CEU San Pablo University - Cremades & Calvo-Sotelo Program. Certified in M&A operations: commercial and tax aspects of mergers and acquisitions. Completed the Leadership Essentials Program by the Center for Creative Leadership. Collaborates with the University of Burgos (Spain), delivering various workshops on "The Profession of Law and Criminology" and "Cybersecurity, Data Protection, and Online Dangers" in the Expert Course for Young People with Intellectual Disabilities, part of the Youth Employment Program co-financed by the European Social Fund+ 2021-2027. She has participated in various national and international conferences and scientific meetings.

Raquel De la Fuente Anuncibay, University of Burgos

Professor at the University of Burgos, Department of Education Sciences. She leads the recognized research group DISCONDU (“Disability and Behavior”) and the Research, Innovation, and Inclusion group. She has supervised numerous doctoral theses and participated as Principal Investigator (PI) and collaborator in various research projects and contracts. She has participated in numerous national and international conferences and has a significant number of publications in impactful books and journals. She is a reviewer for prestigious journals and publishing houses. She co-directs the UBU-Inclusión expert course within the framework of the Call for the Development of University Training Programs for Employment aimed at young people with intellectual disabilities, developmental disabilities, and/or autism spectrum disorders registered in the National Youth Guarantee System. She has been involved in the Unidiversidad Program since 2017.

References

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt, Rinehart y Winston.

Gómez Ortiz, R. A. (2016). El liderazgo empresarial para la innovación tecnológica en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas. Universidad y Empresa, 5(11), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.12804/rev.univ.empresa DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/rev.univ.empresa

Babiak, J. y Bajcar, B. (2003). Gender differences in leadership styles: Who leads more destructively? Ibima Publishing.

Baena-Luna, P. y García-Río, E. (2021). El intraemprendimiento desde una perspectiva de género: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura y una agenda de investigación. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 16(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2021.16.1.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2021.16.1.03

Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W. y Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130041001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130041001

Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410

Bennett Coleman. (2023, 31 de octubre). The influence of gender on leadership styles: Exploring research and theories. The Economic Times.

Brown, M. E. y Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004

Bustos Ramírez, A., Bernal Forero, M. J., Casagua Ramos, J. y Millán Escudero, D. A. (2024). Análisis de Sesgos de Género en Percepción de Liderazgo (Bachelor's thesis, Mercadeo-Virtual).

Cameron, K. S. (2013). Practicing positive leadership: Tools and techniques that create extraordinary results. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Chen, M.-H. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00444.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00439.x

Cuadrado, I., Molero, F. y Nava, M. (2013). Leadership in men and women: Differences on variables. Acción Psicológica, 2(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.2.2.525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.2.2.525

Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C. y Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005

Eagly, A. H. y Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.233

Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. y Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125

Ehrlich, S., De Noble, A. y Singh, J. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Toward the development of a domain-specific measure. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson.

Fairholm, G. W. (1996). Spiritual leadership: Fulfilling whole-self needs at work. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 17(5), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610127469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610127469

Faraci, P., Lock, M. y Wheeler, R. (2013). Assessing leadership decision-making styles: Psychometric properties of the leadership judgement indicator. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 6, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S53713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S53713

Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001

Gardner, W. L., Lowe, K. B., Moss, T. W., Mahoney, K. T. y Cogliser, C. C. (2010). Scholarly leadership of the study of leadership: A review of The Leadership Quarterly's second decade, 2000–2009. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 922-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.003

Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90. http://www.hbr.org/

Greenleaf, R. K. y Spears, L. C. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Gutiérrez, O. (2017). Estudios de liderazgo de hombres y mujeres. Revista Política y Estrategia, 126, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.26797/rpye.v0i126.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26797/rpye.v0i126.62

Hackman, J. R. y Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885

Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: A review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.003

Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H. y Johnson, D. E. (2000). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources. Prentice Hall.

Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F. y Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle manager's perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8

Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G. y Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle-level managers' entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00104.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00104.x

Larsson, G. y Alvinius, A. (2020). Comparison within gender and between female and male leaders in female-dominated, male-dominated and mixed-gender work environments. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(6), 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1638233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1638233

Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. y Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32626023

Lock, M. y Wheeler, R. (2021). LJI-2. Leadership Judgement Indicator. LJI-2. Indicador de Estilos de Liderazgo. TEA Ediciones. Hogrefe.

Luthans, F. y Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. En K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, y R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–258). Berrett-Koehler.

Monzoni, L. (2013). El efecto del liderazgo auténtico y el tipo de establecimiento de metas sobre el desempeño y las respuestas actitudinales y afectivas de los seguidores. El rol modulador de las diferencias individuales. (Tesis doctoral). Universitat de Valencia.

Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., Topa, G. y Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2014). The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0196-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0196-x

Moriano, J. A., Topa, G., Molero, F., Entenza, A. M. y Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2012). Autoeficacia para el liderazgo emprendedor. Adaptación y validación de la escala CESE en España. Anales de Psicología, 28(1), 171-179. http://revistas.um.es/analesps

Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8a ed.). Sage Publications.

Pearce, C. L. y Sims Jr., H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172

Salgado,G., Aguilar, M. y Cárdenas, J.H. (2022). Transformational leadership and its relationship with organizational innovation and green: a literature review. Revista de Administración y Organizaciones, 25(48), 106-132. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/xoc/dcsh/rayo/2022v25n48/Salgado DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/xoc/dcsh/rayo/2022v25n48/Salgado

Shanmugam, M., Amaratunga, D. y Haigh, R. (2007). Leadership styles: Gender similarities, differences and perceptions. En 7th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment, Salford Quays, UK.

Stelmaszczuk, J. (2021). Estilo de liderazgo e indicadores de desempeño organizacional desde la perspectiva del personal de enfermería. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 1, 10. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt202110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt202110

Van Engen, M. L. y Willemsen, T. M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.1.3-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.1.3-18

Vroom, V. H. y Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r

Wakkee, I., Elfring, T. y Monaghan, S. (2008). Creating entrepreneurial employees in traditional service sectors: The role of coaching and self-efficacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0078-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0078-z

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8a ed.). Pearson.

Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S. y Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 20(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429352

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Bueno de la Fuente, C., & De la Fuente Anuncibay, R. (2024). Work context and gender, differentiators of leadership style . European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-420

Issue

Section

INNOVATING IN GENDER CONCEPT