Virtual Organizations: The challenge of labor welfare from the perspective of remote work.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-543Keywords:
Remote work, Labor Welfare, Virtual organizations, Employment, Labor support, Virtual work, Telecommuting, TeleworkAbstract
Introduction: Remote work has become a reality for many companies around the world and the latest pandemic has generated an abrupt and accelerating change in the way work used to work, so companies and workers have had to adapt quickly, embracing remote work as a tool that allows an unexpected leap into the future of work. Methodology: A field study was carried out, applying a survey, based on 55 items, addressed to a sample of 120 employees in remote work conditions in six different countries. Results: The results show that remote work significantly influences work well-being in virtual organizations with a significance level of less than 0.05. Discussions: The key to success lies in careful planning, implementation of inclusive policies and ongoing support for employees to ensure a healthy and productive work environment in any location. Conclusions: The study reflects acceptance and liking for this type of work modality; the countries with the best adaptation to this modality are the USA, Spain, Colombia and Mexico, while in Peru and Guatemala the adaptation and satisfaction indexes were lower.
Downloads
References
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D. y Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Andrade, F. R. B. y Cavaignac, M. D. (2022). Serviço Social e universidade em tempos de ensino remoto emergencial. Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE-CE). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.280
Angulo Paredes, S. A., Fuster-Guillén, D., Sánchez Castro, A., Bautista Rodríguez, E. L. y Cabezas Ramírez, T. V. (2021). Características predominantes del aprendizaje organizacional que influyen en el bienestar laboral de los docentes del Perú. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(1), e1035. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9n1.1035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9n1.1035
Arvola, R., Tint, P., Kristjuhan, U. y Siirak, V. (2017). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 24(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0013
Ascoli, U., Natali, D. y Pavolini, E. (2018). Still a weak occupational welfare in southern Europe? Evidence from the Italian case. Social Policy and Administration, 52(2), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12382
Bargal, D. (1984). Job description of occupational welfare: A tool in role development. Administration in Social Work, 8(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v08n01_05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v08n01_05
Beno, M. (2022). Differences between managing face-to-display workers and in-house workers (hybrid work model): A qualitative study from Austria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(2), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0033
Blanch, J., Sahagún, M., Cantera, L. y Cervantes, G. (2010). Questionnaire of general labor well-being: Structure and psychometric properties. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 26, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2010v26n2a7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2010v26n2a7
Burton, D. (1997). Ethnicity and occupational welfare: A study of pension scheme membership in Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 11(3), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017097113006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017097113006
Casanova, G., Di Rosa, M., Fisher, O. y Lamura, G. (2020). Between migrant care work and new occupational welfare tools: Changing home care arrangements in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155511
Castaño, M. B., Gelabert, M. M., Cantero, M. C. T., Sebastián, M. J. Q. y Perona, V. C. (2011). Analysis of several work-related well-being factors among emergency medical services physicians: Between the thrill and the exhaustion. Ansiedad y Estrés, 17(2-3), 221-231. https://acortar.link/TFsyCm
Chuco Aguilar, V. J., Álvarez Pejerrey, J. A., Chávez Ramírez, M. G. A. y Cuba Rosales, L. A. F. (2020). El trabajo remoto y el desempeño laboral en el marco del COVID-19. Review of Global Management, 6(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.19083/rgm.v6i1.1489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19083/rgm.v6i1.1489
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2012). Un acercamiento a la medición del teletrabajo: Evidencia de algunos países de América Latina. CEPAL. https://acortar.link/UmP1zo
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2021). Estudio económico: De América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: Naciones Unidas. https://acortar.link/tMPR9r
Cortini, M., Tanucci, G. y Morin, E. M. (2010). Boundaryless careers and occupational well-being. Boundaryless careers and occupational well-being (pp. 1-314). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281851
Cotton, P. y Hart, P. M. (2003). Occupational well-being and performance: A review of organisational health research. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707117
Das, M., Tang, J., Ringland, K. E. y Piper, A. M. (2021). Towards accessible RemoteWork: Understanding work-from-home practices of neurodivergent professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3449282
de Macedo, T. A. M., Cabral, E. L. dos S., Silva Castro, W. R., de Souza Junior y C. C., da Costa. (2020). Ergonomics and telework: A systematic review. Work, 777-788. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203224
Feng, Z. y Savani, K. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202
Gallacher, G. y Hossain, I. (2021). Erratum: Remote work and employment dynamics under COVID-19: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 46(S1), S44–S54. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-026
Grabner, S. M. y Tsvetkova, A. (2022). Urban labour market resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic: What is the promise of teleworking? Regional Studies, 57(12), 2521-2536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2031234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2042470
Greve, B. (2018). At the heart of the Nordic occupational welfare model: Occupational welfare trajectories in Sweden y Denmark. Social Policy and Administration, 52(2), 508-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12380
Hernández e Ibarra. (2019). Conciliación de la vida familiar y laboral. Un reto para México. Iztapalapa Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 86(40), 159-184. https://acortar.link/o5RPO0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28928/ri/862019/aot2/hernandezlimonchim/ibarrauribel
Lopes da Silva y Barreto Santos. (2022). O Desenvolvimento Profissional Docente e Educação Básica na Pandemia de COVID-19. SciELO Preprints, 39. https://www.scielo.br/j/edur/a/5TZfdtTSrwn9H83tjhyBqnw/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-469838326t
Luceño-Moreno, L., Talavera-Velasco, B., Martín-García, J. y Martín, S. E. (2017). Psychosocial risk factors as predictors of occupational well-being: A SEM analysis. Ansiedad y Estrés, 23(2-3), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2017.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2017.09.001
Mannheim, B. y Papo, E. (1999). Differences in organizational commitment and its correlates among professional and nonprofessional occupational welfare workers. Administration in Social Work, 23(3-4), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_07
Mannheim, B. y Papo, E. (2013). Differences in organizational commitment and its correlates among professional and nonprofessional occupational welfare workers. En Social services in the workplace: Repositioning occupational social work in the new millennium (pp. 119-138). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203725191_7
Mion, G., Bonfanti, A., Simeoni, F. y Loza Adaui, C. R. (2021). Rethinking occupational welfare policies in long-term care organisations during the COVID-19 pandemic: An organisational ethics approach. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 13(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2021.116216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2021.10039260
Moreno, N. (2012). Novedades en materia de modalidades contractuales: Contrato indefinido para pequeñas empresas, trabajo a tiempo parcial y a distancia. Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, 115, 193-220. https://acortar.link/liD0Y7
Okubo, T. (2022). Telework in the spread of COVID-19. Information Economics and Policy, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100987
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2021). Informe Región América. https://acortar.link/IUdxbB
Organización Internacional del Trabajo. (2021). Desafíos y oportunidades del teletrabajo en América Latina y el Caribe. https://acortar.link/qKZKgY
Prasad, K. D. V., Mangipudi, M. R., Vaidya, R. W. y Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challenges and psychological wellbeing of the remote working employees during covid-19 pandemic: A general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 372-389. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.4.2020.037
Riva, E. y Rizza, R. (2021). Who receives occupational welfare? The importance of skills across Europe’s diverse industrial relations regimes. Transfer, 27(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920980635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920980635
Shamir, B. y Bargal, D. (1982). Occupational welfare and organizational effectiveness: Some theoretical notes. Administration in Social Work, 6(4), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v06n04_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v06n04_04
Stalmachova, K., Chinoracky, R. y Strenitzerova, M. (2022). Changes in business models caused by digital transformation and the COVID‐19 pandemic and possibilities of their measurement—Case study. Sustainability, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010127
Szulc, J. M., McGregor, F. y Cakir, E. (2021). Neurodiversity and remote work in times of crisis: Lessons for HR. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2021-0469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2021-0469
Tuisku, K., Pulkki-Raback, L. y Virtanen, M. (2016). Cultural events provided by employer and occupational wellbeing of employees: A cross-sectional study among hospital nurses. Work, 55(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162389
Uribe Kajatt, J., Geraldo-Campos, L. A., de Castro Hidalgo, D. E. R., Vargas Dávila, J. G. y Jiménez de Aliaga, K. M. (2022). Propiedades psicométricas para medir factores del trabajo remoto: Un análisis exploratorio en colaboradores estudiantes. Estudios Gerenciales, 38(165), 436-448. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2022.165.5220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2022.165.5220
Vera, M., Salanova, M. y Martín, B. (2010). University faculty and work-related well-being: The importance of the triple work profile. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 581-602. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i21.1373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i21.1373
Zhang, Y., Nowak, A., Romanowski, A. y Fjeld, M. (2022). On-site or remote working?: An initial solution on how COVID-19 pandemic may impact augmented reality users. En ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 65, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3534490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3534490
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeymi Fabiola Arias Hancco, Luis Enrique Espinoza Villalobos, Hugo Alatrista Salas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).