The national-popular in Ecuador: a dialectical relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-577Keywords:
nation, people, dialectic, power, Ecuador, élite, nationalism, populismAbstract
Introduction: Nationalism and populism have marked the recent history of Latin America, with Ecuador as a unique case. The objectives of this study are to identify the political and power actors who have projected ideas of nationhood, and to analyse the dialectic between different senses of nationhood and the notion of ‘people’ in Ecuador's social struggles over the last thirty years. Methodology: Dialectics was used both as a lens for observing the process and as a method of analysis to understand the development of the sense of the Ecuadorian nation in relation to the popular. The research focuses on a conflict-based conceptualisation of dialectics, using antagonistic perspectives such as those of Heraclitus, materialism and illuminism. A historiographical review of the last three decades of nation-building efforts by political actors and social movements was undertaken. Results: The study reveals a constant dispute over the sense of nation, evidenced by symptoms such as political instability, social conflict and the prominence of the armed forces as a political catalyst in governmental crises. Conclusions: Both nationalism and populism in Ecuador have had political and ideological translations that are reflected in the aforementioned political and social instability and conflict.
Downloads
References
Barrera, A. (2001). Acción colectiva y crisis política. El movimiento indígena ecuatoriano en la década de los noventa. OSAL / CLACSO.
Cabrera, J. (1992). La nación como discurso. La estructura del sistema ideológico nacionalista: el caso gallego. CIS.
Cañas, R. (2010). La dialéctica en la filosofía griega. Intersedes, 22, 27-56. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/666/66620589003.pdf
Carrera, G. (1976). El nacionalismo latinoamericano en perspectiva histórica. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 38, 783-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/3539707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3539707
Errejón, I. (2011). La lucha por la hegemonía durante el primer gobierno del MAS en Bolivia (2006-2009): un análisis discursivo a [tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid]. Repositorio Institucional UCM. https://eprints.ucm.es/14574/1/T33089.pdf
Geertz, C. (1987). La Interpretación de las culturas. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
Gonçalvez, L. (2000). La metodología genealógica y arqueológica de Michel Foucault en la investigación en psicología social. Folle. Mª y Protesoni, A. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo.
Gramsci, A. (1975). Cuadernos de la cárcel. Ediciones ERA.
Grossberg, L. (1996). Identity and cultural studies. Is that all there is?. En S. Hall, y P. du Gay (eds.) Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 87-107). Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907.n6
Hall, S. (1996). Who Needs 'Identity'? In S. Hall, y P. du Gay (Eds.) Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 1-17). Sage Publications.
Horkheimer, M. y Adorno, T. (2009). Dialéctica de la ilustración. Fragmentos filosóficos. Trotta.
Hunt, S., Benford, R. y Snow, D. (1994). Marcos de acción colectiva y campos de identidad en la construcción social de los movimientos. En Laraña y J. Gusfield (eds). Los Nuevos Movimientos Sociales. De la ideología a la identidad (pp. 221-249). CIS.
Johnston, H. (1995): A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schemata. En H. Johnston, y B. Klandermans (eds.) Social Movements and Culture. (pp. 217-246). University of Minnesota Press.
Máiz, R. (2004). El indigenismo político en América Latina. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 123, 129-174 https://acortar.link/y0Ti3d
Sánchez-Parga, J. (2007). El movimiento indígena ecuatoriano. Centro Andino de Acción Popular.
Tarrow, S. (2004). El poder en movimiento. Taurus.
Weaver, D. (1976). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. Shaw, y M. Mc Combs (Eds.). The emergence of American political issues: the agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 107-119) West Publishing House.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pablo Pardo Moreno (Autor de Correspondencia); José Jesús Albert Márquez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).