MoPI.IA: exploring the usefulness of generative AI for thesis project ideation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-804

Keywords:

academic research, chatbot, ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence, prompt engineering, research proposal, research topic ideation, thesis

Abstract

Introduction: The “Modelo Personal para la Investigación” (MoPI) is a methodological tool created at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) to support students in the elaboration of thesis proposals. In 2023, the MoPI.IA project was launched to integrate generative AI (IAG) into the MoPI methodology, with the aim of improving the ideation of research topics. Methodology: In this first phase of the project, ChatGPT 3.5 was used applying prompts engineering techniques. The responses generated by the chatbot were evaluated for relevance, consistency and practical value. Results: Initial exploration showed that MoPI.IA has significant benefits, especially for students facing difficulties in generating thesis ideas. The incorporation of chatbots showed great potential in this process. Discussion:

Although MoPI.IA proved useful in research topic ideation, areas for improvement were identified in prompt engineering techniques and chatbot selection. Conclusions: Future research will evaluate other chatbots and additional techniques to further improve the MoPI methodology, with the goal of further innovation in supporting students in formulating thesis projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Edilberto Casado Márquez Casado Márquez, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

Master in Management from ESAN Graduate School of Business and Chemical Engineer from Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Peru. Director of the Information Sciences program at PUCP, where he also teaches and conducts research in Cyberculture, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Information and Knowledge Management, Innovation Management, Project Management and Research Methods. Creator of the Personal Model for Research (MoPI), methodology for the development of thesis projects, winner of the Innovation Award in University Teaching 2019 granted by the PUCP.

References

6. Referencias

Abreu, J. L. (2015). Síndrome Todo Menos Tesis (TMT). Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience, 10(2), 246-259. https://bit.ly/3W8zzKH

Anthropic. (s.f.). Ingeniería de prompts. https://bit.ly/AnthropicIngenieriaPrompts

Ben-Zur, L. (2024, 2 de enero). Beyond the Prompt: Why Rigid AI Frameworks Stifle True Conversational Potential. LBZ Advisory. https://bit.ly/3W7KHre

Casado, E. (2019). The Personal Model for Research version 2 and its visualization method to learn design of research proposals. Education for Information, 35(3), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190283

DAIR.AI. (s.f.). Prompt Engineering Guide. https://www.promptingguide.ai/

Jacks, P., Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L. y Connolly, T. (1983). The ABCs of ABDs: A Study of Incomplete Doctorates. Improving College and University Teaching, 31(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533805

Kaplan, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.

Khan, I. (2024). The quick guide to prompt engineering. Wiley.

Mahdawi, A. (2024, 12 de enero). What is going on with ChatGPT? The Guardian. https://bit.ly/46880pa

Merriam-Webster. (s.f.). generative AI. En Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://bit.ly/3W5wzPh

Mizrahi, G. (2024). Unlocking the Secrets of Prompt Engineering. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Musiol, M. (2024). Generative AI: Navigating the course to the artificial general intelligence future (1ª ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

Mustafa, N. (2024, 7 de febrero). Mastering ChatGPT: Boost Your Creativity with Expert Prompt Engineering Techniques. Medium. https://bit.ly/MustafaMasteringChatGPT

OpenAI. (s.f.). Prompt engineering. https://bit.ly/OpenAIPromptEngineering

Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Altman, S. [@sama]. (2022, 30 de noviembre). Today we launched ChatGPT. Try talking with it here. [Tweet]. https://x.com/sama/status/1598038815599661056

Sherry, B. (2023, 12 de diciembre). ChatGPT is showing signs of laziness. OpenAI dice que la IA podría necesitar una solución. Inc.com. https://www.inc.com/ben-sherry/chatgpt-is-showing-signs-of-laziness-openai-says-ai-might-need-a-fix.html

The Prompt Index. (s.f.). https://www.thepromptindex.com/index.php

Wolfe, C. R. (2024, 29 de abril). Modern advances in prompt engineering [Boletín de Substack]. Deep (Learning) Focus. https://bit.ly/WolfeModernAdvancesPromptEngineering

Published

2024-09-20

How to Cite

Casado Márquez, E. C. M. (2024). MoPI.IA: exploring the usefulness of generative AI for thesis project ideation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-804

Issue

Section

Research articles