Design and Validation of a Perception Instrument for Educational Communities on the Stimulation of 21st- Century Skills in Students within the School System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-883Keywords:
instrument, questionnaire, validation, perception, 21st-century skills, educational communities, students, school systemAbstract
Introduction: The objective was to design and validate an instrument that measures the perception of educational communities on the stimulation of 21st- Century Skills in students. Methodology: Complementary. Content validation was conducted with 10 experts using the Delphi method, achieving a consensus of Cns = .525. Reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of α = .919. Construct validity was determined through exploratory factor analysis with a sample of 173 subjects from five educational institutions in the Ñuble and Biobío regions of Chile. Results: The KMO test resulted in .896 and Bartlett's test of sphericity showed a p < .000. Factor analysis identified four factors explaining 65.89% of the total variance, configuring the instrument into four dimensions: Social, Emotional, Digital, and Cognitive, with a total of 19 items. Discussion: The instrument has high reliability and a robust factor structure; however, qualitative studies are recommended to complement its applicability in educational contexts. Conclusion: The instrument presents adequate content and construct validity, assuring its use in studies related to the perception of educational communities and 21st-Century Skills.
Downloads
References
Ananiadou, K. y Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for new Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. EDU Working paper, 41, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Bericat E. (1998). La investigación de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Ariel Sociología.
Burgos, R. (2006). Metodología de investigación y escritura científica en clínica. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública.
Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2007). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521-551. https://acortar.link/7b94Pz
Esnaola, I. (2005). Elaboración y validación del cuestionario Autokontzeptu Fisikoaren Itaunketa (AFI) de autoconcepto físico. Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco, España.
Ferrando, P. J. y Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://acortar.link/YsD2Yp
Garay, I. S., Quintana, M. G. B. (2019). 21st Century Skills. An Analysis of Theoretical Frameworks to Guide Educational Innovation Processes in Chilean Context. En A. Visvizi, M. Lytras (Eds.), Research & Innovation Forum 2019. RIIFORUM 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity (pp. 37-47). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30809-4_4
George, D. y Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4ª ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B. y Care, E. (2012). The changing role of education schools. En P. Griffin, B. McGaw y E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp 1-17), Springer.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291575
van Laar, E., Van Deursena, A., Van Dijka, J. y De Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
Latiesa, M. (2003). Validez y fiabilidad de las observaciones sociológicas. En M. García Ferrando, J. Ibáñez y F. Alvira (Eds.), El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación (3a ed., pp. 409-443). Alianza Editorial.
Lee, L., Gurnam, K. y Chang, Y. (2015). Exploring 21st century skills among postgraduates in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1406
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-55. https://acortar.link/ykUeQs
Linstone, H. A. y Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, Addison Wesley Publishing.
Matas, A. (2018). Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347
Méndez, C. y Rondón, M. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41 (1), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-7450(14)60077-9
Montoya, O. (2007). Aplicación del análisis factorial a la investigación de mercados. Caso de estudio. Scientia et Technica, 35, 281-286. https://acortar.link/wonDEy
Namthip, O., Sirichai, K. y Chanatip, T. (2015). Development of 21st Century Skill Scales as Perceived by Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 737-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.716
OECD. (2018). Education 2030: The Future of Education and Skills Project. https://acortar.link/DitCS
Ortega, E., Jiménez, J. M., Palao, J. M. y Sainz, P. (2008). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para valorar las preferencias y satisfacciones en jóvenes jugadoras de baloncesto. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 8(2), 39-58. https://acortar.link/i0DgM5
van de Oudeweetering, K. y Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers' conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
P21. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. https://acortar.link/YX2pRM
Salamanca, I. y Badilla, M. G. (2020). Estudio de marcos referenciales de habilidades para el siglo XXI: un modelo eco-sistémico para orientar procesos de innovación educativa. Synergies Chili, 16, 33-48. https://acortar.link/NYpZuK
SMConectados. (2014). El sistema educativo no prepara a los alumnos para los grandes retos del siglo XXI. https://bit.ly/2yvEoTS
Tastle, W. y Wierman, M. (2007). Consensus and dissention: A measure of ordinal dispersion. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 45, 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.024
Thomsom, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. American Psychological Association.
UNESCO. (2017). Declaración de Buenos Aires: E2030: Educación y habilidades para el siglo 21. UNESCO.
Visauta, B. y Martori, J. C. (2003) Análisis estadístico con SPSS para Windows. Volumen II, Estadística multivariante. McGraw-Hill.
Wiersma, L. D. (2001). Conceptualization and development of the sources of enjoyment in youth sport questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5(3), 153-177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0503_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignacio Salamanca - Garay; Emilio Sagredo - Lillo (Autor de Correspondencia)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).