Transcending subjectivity: artistic and creative development in university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1359Palabras clave:
Anticipatory methodologies, Art education, Teacher training, Student self-assessment, Creative skills development, Gender differences, Academic success perspectives, Holistic learning integrationResumen
Introduction: This study addresses the gap in literature by examining how anticipatory methodologies impact college students' self-assessment of art subjects during their Teacher Education Degree training. Methodology: Sixty-eight third-year undergraduate students in Primary Education participated, predominantly women (82,5%), aged 20 to 28 years (M= 22,18; SD= 1,95). Using quantitative methods, the research evaluated how anticipatory teaching approaches predict positive learning outcomes and prevent student demotivation in art education. Results: Findings revealed significant enhancements in students' artistic and creative skills through these methodologies, with younger participants showing notable advancements. Discussions: Discussions highlighted the importance of cultivating positive student self-perception, robust teacher support, diverse definitions of academic success, and implementing varied educational models to optimize learning experiences. Ultimately, integrating anticipatory methodologies into art education not only enriches artistic and creative abilities but also fosters holistic learning. Conclusions: The study advocates for social inclusion and cultural heritage preservation to sustain and enhance the role of artistic education in providing quality and comprehensive learning environments. These insights contribute to advancing educational practices that empower students and promote a broader understanding of academic achievement in the context of art and creativity.
Descargas
Citas
Asoodeh, M. H., Asoodeh, M. B., & Zarepour, M. (2012). The impact of student-centered learning on academic achievement and social skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 560-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.160
Bell, J., & Bell, T. (2018). Integrating computational thinking with a music education context. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 151-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.09
Blair, J., Czaja, R. F., & Blair, E. A. (2013). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071909904
Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science research. The Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 22(4), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959
Brown, S. L. (2019). Effects of Advanced Placement Courses on College Academic Success [Tesis de doctorado]. Immaculata University.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Cicourel, A. V., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2020). Educational decision makers. En Toward a Sociology of Education (pp. 197-205). Routledge.
Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023254226592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592
Conley, D. T. (2003). Understanding university success. Center for Educational Policy Research, University of Oregon.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L.S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Domanska, O.M., Bollweg, T.M., Loer, A.K., Holmberg, C., Schenk, L., & Jordan, S. (2020). Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Self-Reported Generic Health Literacy in Adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082860
Drennan, J. (2003). Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x
Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner.
Duman, B. (2010). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2077-2103.
Eisner, E. W. (2005). Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner. Taylor & Francis.
Fernández-Company, J. F., Alvarado, J. M., García-Rodríguez, M., & Chamorro-Cantero, I. (2023). Eficacia de la escucha musical en el rendimiento matemático: Efficacy of music listening on mathematical performance. Revista Electrónica Complutense de Investigación en Educación Musical - RECIEM, 20, 129-154. https://doi.org/10.5209/reciem.80541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/reciem.80541
Fernández-Morante, C., Fernández de la Iglesia, J.D.C., Cebreiro, B., & Latorre-Ruiz, E. (2022). ATS-STEM: Global Teaching Methodology to Improve Competences of Secondary Education Students. Sustainability, 14(12), 6986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126986
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gamella-González, D.J. (2019). El acierto de las equivocaciones. Aportaciones de la neurociencia cognitiva al proceso de aprendizaje. Pulso, 42, 167-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.4856
García-Rodríguez, M., Jiménez, V., Ivanova, A., Fernández-Company, J. F., & Alvarado, J. M. (2021). Academic performance in relation to emotional intelligence: emotional perception and musical sensitivity. INTED2021 Proceedings, 2075-2082. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.0454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.0454
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Gezim, B.A.R.A., & Xhomara, N. (2020). The effect of student-centered teaching and problem-based learning on academic achievement in science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.20
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Gutiérrez, M., & Tomás, J. M. (2018). Motivational class climate, motivation, and academic success in university students. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.02.001
Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2001). The arts and academic achievement: What the evidence shows. Arts Education Policy Review, 102(5), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910109600008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910109600008
Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2004). Cognitive transfer from arts education to nonarts outcomes. En Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 135-162). Routledge.
Huerta, R., & Domínguez, R. (2022). Sociedad para la Educación Artística SEA. EARI. Educación artística. Revista de investigación, 13, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.13.25836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.13.25836
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. Corwin Press.
Johnston, S., & Barbour, M.K. (2013). Measuring success: Examining achievement and perceptions of online advanced placement students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.755072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.755072
Kaput, K. (2018). Evidence for Student-Centered Learning. Education evolving.
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Khurshid, F. (2014). Factors affecting higher education students’ success. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 1(5), 40-47.
Kimberlin, C.L., & Winterstein, A.G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy: AJHP: Official Journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 65(23), 2276-2284. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364
Klopfenstein, K., & Thomas, M.K. (2009). The link between advanced placement experience and early college success. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 873-891. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2009.tb00935.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2009.tb00935.x
Kolluri, S. (2018). Advanced Placement: The Dual Challenge of Equal Access and Effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 671-711. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318787268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318787268
Kpolovie, P. J., Joe, A. I., & Okoto, T. (2014). Academic achievement prediction: Role of interest in learning and attitude towards school. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(11), 73-100.
Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Questionnaire Design. En D. Vannette & J. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_53
Land, M.H. (2013). Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefits of Integrating the Arts Into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
Ley Orgánica 3/2018. De Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. 5 de diciembre de 2018. Boletín Oficial del Estado, No. 294. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2018/12/05/3/con
Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922
Newland, A. (2013). Engaging students through image and word. Art Education, 66(2), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2013.11519216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2013.11519216
Palacios, A. (2018). Diálogos creativos. Un proyecto de mediación artística en la formación inicial del profesorado. En E. Jiménez, A. Arriaga, & I. Marcellán (Eds.), Arte, ilustración y cultura visual: diálogos en torno a la mediación educativa crítica dentro y fuera de la escuela (pp. 479-483). Biblioteca Universitaria del País Vasco.
Peppler, K.A., Powell, C.W., Thompson, N., & Catterall, J. (2014). Positive impact of arts integration on student academic achievement in English language arts. The Educational Forum, 78(4), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.941124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.941124
Pohontsch, N., & Meyer, T. (2015). Cognitive interviewing - a tool to develop and validate questionnaires. Die Rehabilitation, 54(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394443
Robinson, A.H. (2013). Arts integration and the success of disadvantaged students: A research evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.826050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.826050
Rowley, J. (2014). Designing and using research questionnaires. Management Research Review, 37(3), 308-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027
Salido-López, P. V. (2021). La Educación Artística ante el reto de enseñar a aprender: un estudio de caso en la formación de docentes. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 33(4), 1429-1447. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.72439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.72439
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118634646
Schneider, V., & Rohmann, A. (2021). Arts in education: A systematic review of competency outcomes in quasi-experimental and experimental studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 623935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623935
Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S.C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334-1339. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400868x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400868x
Stachl, C. N., & Baranger, A. M. (2020). Sense of belonging within the graduate community of a research-focused STEM department: Quantitative assessment using a visual narrative and item response theory. PloS One, 15(5), e0233431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233431
Sumozas, R. (2021). Situación actual de la educación artística en España. Revista Multidisciplinar, 3(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.23882/DI2158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23882/DI2158
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Torres-Díaz, J. C., Duart, J., Gómez-Alvarado, H. F., Marín-Gutiérrez, I., & Segarra-Faggioni, V. (2016). Internet use and academic success in university students. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 24(48), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-06
UNESCO. (1996). Convención sobre la protección del patrimonio mundial, cultural y natural. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-es.pdf
Walters, S.J., Stern, C., & Robertson-Malt, S. (2016). The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 14(4), 138-197. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159
Wang, Y., Chung, L.H., Cheng, C.Y., Wang, W.J., Chang, L.C., Huang, Y.M., ... & Wu, C.Y. (2023). Predictors of Academic and Fieldwork Performance in Occupational Therapy Students: A Systematic Review. Occupational Therapy International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7281555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7281505
Weatherton, M., & Schussler, E. E. (2021). Success for All? A Call to Re-examine How Student Success Is Defined in Higher Education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(1), es3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-09-0223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-09-0223
Weatherton, M., & Schussler, E.E. (2022). Exploring Student Perspectives: How Graduate Students in a Life Science Department Define Success. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar34. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0319
Weiss, R.P. (2000). Brain based learning. Training & Development, 54(7), 21-21.
Wolters, C.A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9
World Medical Association. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373-374.
York, T.T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.7275/hz5x-tx03
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 José Fernando Fernández Company, David José Gamella González, María García Rodríguez

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).