AI-assisted feedback in CLIL courses as a self-regulated language learning mechanism: students’ perceptions and experiences

Miguel Campos

doi:10.31637/epsir-2025-1568

Autores

Miguel Campos Toyo University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1568

Palavras-chave:

self-regulated learning, AI-assisted learning, ChatGPT, CLIL, writing feedback, instructional feedback, ESL, ICTs

Resumo

Introduction: The integration of AI in educational settings offers significant potential for enhancing learning experiences, particularly in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) contexts. AI tools, such as ChatGPT, provide personalized feedback on writing, addressing issues like unclear content, grammatical errors, or poor vocabulary. This study examines students' perceptions of AI-assisted feedback in a business CLIL course and evaluates the actual improvements in their writing based on the feedback provided by AI. Methodology: University students (n=205) participated in a 15-week Data Description writing course, using ChatGPT to receive specific criteria-based feedback on weekly compositions. Students revised their drafts based on this feedback before their submission. A survey (n=192) assessed their experiences and the perceived impact on writing skills and task efficiency. Additionally, a sample (n=336) of the writing compositions was coded and analyzed to evaluate linguistic enhancement. Results: Results indicate that students found AI feedback beneficial for improving writing skills and appreciated its immediacy and specificity. However, concerns were noted about the complexity and relevance of the feedback. Discussions: Despite these issues, students responded positively, showing significant improvement in content accuracy and linguistic proficiency. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential of AI tools and the need for refining AI feedback mechanisms.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia Autor

Miguel Campos, Toyo University

Miguel Campos (Ph.D.) is an academic specializing in educational literacies, instructional feedback, and ICT integration in higher education. He currently serves as the editor of the PanSIG Journal for the Japan Association of Language Teaching (JALT). His research focuses on educational methodologies and technologies in ESL and CLIL contexts, as well as the experiences of foreign language teachers and students in Japan.

Referências

Alzahrani, F. K. J., & Alotaibi, H. H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on enhancing EFL writing skills among high school students. Journal of Educational and Human Sciences, 34, 226-239. https://doi.org/10.33193/JEAHS.34.2024.482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/JEAHS.34.2024.482

Cao, S., & Zhong, L. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT-based feedback compared with teacher feedback and self-feedback: Evidence from Chinese to English translation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.01645

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549

Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, H., Li, T., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2023, pp. 323–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hcgzj DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00100

Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610

Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Gunyel, F. O., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024). Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6

Loyola Innaci, D., & Helan Jona, P. (2024). AI in second language learning: Leveraging automated writing assistance tools for improving learners’ writing task assessment. Jamal Academic Research Journal-An Interdisciplinary (JARJ), 5(1).

Ranalli, J., Link, S., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011

Son, J.-B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015

Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0