From compass to radar: An innovative methodological strategy for researching cultural innovation: De la brújula al radar: Una estrategia metodológica innovadora para investigar la innovación cultural

Begoña Abad; Sandra González

doi:10.31637/epsir-2022-201

Autores/as

Begoña Abad Universidad del País Vasco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-4387
Sandra González Universidad del País Vasco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-6009

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2022-201

Palabras clave:

cultural innovation, methodological innovation, onto-epistemological turn, linear research process, processual research process

Resumen

In response to the absence of a deep reflection on methodological innovation, this article sets out to approach the most appropriate strategy for investigating cultural innovation. In this regard, underlying this article there is a conceptual revision of two key terms: culture and innovation. The former is expanded towards more open and creative visions, and the latter is redefined from a linear and accumulative conceptualisation to an open and creative process. In order to build a new methodological approach based on this revision, we focus on presenting an onto-epistemological turn that implies a move from a research process in a linear progression, to an innovative cultural research process understood as an event that is processual, relational, and performative. By way of conclusion, the article proposes a creative and innovative research device that is open to the multiple configurations in which individuals and groups inhabit, build and experience culture in innovative ways.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abad Miguélez, B., & Davila Legerén, A. (2020). Infortunio de la investigación social cualitativa en la era del capitalismo académico. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.82-95

Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512

Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20(Winter, 1991-1992), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221

Alexander, B. K. (2013). “Etnografía performativa. La representación y la incitación de la cultura”. In Norman K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Comps.), Manual de Investigación Cualitativa (Volumen III, pp. 94-153). Editorial Gedisa.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

Barnett, A. (2014). The Creative Analytic Paradigm and Generative Social Research within the Context of the Early-Years/Kindergarten Physical Learning Environment. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 283-290. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/2/5/8/index.html

Benozzo, A., Bell, H., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2013). Moving Between Nuisance, Secrets, and Splinters as Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487878

Braidotti, R. (2015). Lo posthumano. Editorial Gedisa.

Carrasco Segovia, S., & Castro Varela, A. (2020). Más allá de la máquina antropocéntrica: hacia una educación e investigación posthumanistas (pp. 67-81). In J. M. Sancho Gil, F. Hernández Hernández, L. Montero Mesa, J. de Pablos Pons, J. I. Rivas Flores & A. Ocaña Fernández (Coords.) Caminos y derivas para otra investigación educativa y social. Editorial Octaedro.

Childers, S. M. (2012). Against Simplicity, Against Ethics: Analytics of Disruption as Quasi-Methodology Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 752-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453015

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [trans. Brian Massumi]. University of Minnesota Press.

Denzin, N. K. (2003). The call to performance. Symbolic Interaction, 26(1), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.1.187

Dewsbury, J. D. (2000). Performativity and the event: enacting a philosophy of difference. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 473-496. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/d200t

Greene, J. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788763

Haraway, D. (1999). Las promesas de los monstruos: una política regeneradora para otros inapropiados/bles, Política y sociedad, 30, 121-163 [Translated by Elena Casado. Reproduced with the permission of Routledge, Inc., from C. Nelson, P. Treichíer and L. Orossberg (Eds.), (1991), Cultural Studies. London and New York] https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO9999130121A

Hustak C., & Myers, N. (2012). Involutionary momentum: Affective ecologies and the sciences of plant/insect encounters. Differences, 23(3), 74-118. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892907

Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research. Methodologies without Methodology. Sage Publications.

Krehl, M., Thomas, E., & Bellingham, R. (2020). The vitality of theory in research innovation. In M. Krehl, E. Thomas & R. Bellingham (Eds.), Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies (pp. 1-16). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Lasén, A., & Casado, E. (2014). Mediaciones tecnológicas. Cuerpos, afectos y subjetividades. Universidad Complutense y Centro de Investigaciones sociológicas.

Lather, P. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. In A. Jackson & L. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: challenging conventional, interpretive and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17-26). Routledge.

Law, J. (2004). After Method. Mess in social science research. Routledge.

Lupton, D. (2021). ‘Things that matter’: poetic inquiry and more-than-human health literacy. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1690564

Mannay, D., & Morgan, M. (2015). Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the “waiting field”. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 166-182. https://acortar.link/njs0Cf

Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788756

Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788761

Merton, R. K. (1948). The bearing of empirical research upon the development of social theory. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087142

Michael, M. (2012). De-signing the object of sociology: toward an ‘idiotic’ methodology. The Sociological Review, 60(S1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02122.x

Pacho, J. (2009). La paradoja de la innovación. Aspectos axiológicos y espistémico-culturales. In M. J. Maidagán, I. Ceberio, L. Garagalza & G. Arrizabalaga (Eds.), Filosofía de la Innovación. El papel de la creatividad en un mundo global (pp. 13-44). Editorial Plaza y Valdés.

Piazuelo Lamote de Grignon, C., & YProductions. (2008). Innovación en Cultura: Una Aproximación Crítica a la Genealogía y Usos del Concepto. YProductions.

Raquejo, T. (2020). Caminar con arte. Mapas colectivos del entorno. In T. Raquejo (Coord.), El arte de corporeizar el entorno. Prácticas artísticas para una pedagogía del sentir (pp. 155-172). Editorial Aula Magna, McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.

Salazar, N. B. (2022). Anthropologies of the Present and the Presence of Anthropology. Etnografia. 2(16), 6-24. https://acortar.link/bBJrtT

Shumack, K., & Tuckwell, J. (2010). Mapping as Assemblage for Cultural Research. University of Western Sydney, Institute for Culture and Society. Occasional Paper Series, 1(5), 1-18. https://acortar.link/hAtoTN

Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins UP.

Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.

St. Pierre, E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278

Taylor, C., & Coffey, A. (2008). Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: Possibilities and Challenges. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Paper 121, 1-25. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/78184/1/wp121.pdf

Torrance, H. (2019). Data as Entanglement: New Definitions and Uses of Data in Qualitative Research, Policy, and Neoliberal Governance. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418807239

Vannini, Ph. (2015). Non-Representational Methodologies. Re-Envisioning Research. Routledge.

Wentzer, T. S., & Mattingly, C. (2018). Toward a new humanism: An approach from philosophical anthropology. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1–2), 144-157. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/698361

Wiles, R., Pain, H., & Crow G. (2010). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. University of Southampton; ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. NCRM Working Paper Series 03/10, 1-32. https://acortar.link/SgQfmM

Woolgar, S. (1991). Ciencia: abriendo la caja negra. Anthropos Editorial.

Youngblood Jackson, A. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788762