Detected versus self-reported beliefs of mathematics teachers about the use of digital technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1036Keywords:
digital technology, beliefs, mathematics teachers, narratives, self-perception, comparative analysis, mathematics education, teaching with technologyAbstract
Introduction: This research explores and compares the beliefs inferred by the researchers and the self-perceived beliefs of a group of mathematics teachers in relation to mathematics, its teaching and the use of digital technology. Methodology: It is a qualitative, case study that uses narratives and comparison. Results: In the comparison between the beliefs inferred by the researchers with respect to those self-perceived by the teachers, it was found that the most consistent belief was the post-mastery belief, related to the fact that students must first master mathematical concepts before using digital technology when study mathematics in class. Discussion: It is argued that the characteristics of the participating teachers could explain the results as they were trained in the traditional pencil and paper model. Conclusions: The use of narratives and comparison made it possible to identify beliefs that were deeply rooted in teachers and to learn about other beliefs that were not detected in the narratives.
Downloads
References
Assude, T., Buteau, C. y Forgasz, H. (2010). Factors Influencing Implementation of Technology-Rich Mathematics Curriculum and Practices. En C. Hoyles y J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Technology– Rethinking the Terrain. The 17th ICMI Study (pp. 405-423). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_19
Azamar, A. (2016). La integración de la tecnología al Sistema Educativo Mexicano: Sin plan ni rumbo. Rencuentro. Análisis de problemas universitarios, 28(72), 11-26.
Chinche, S. M. (2020). Consideraciones generales en torno a la comprensión de la realidad del mundo social. HUMAN Review, 9(2), 127-140. https://goo.su/A0ITVf DOI: https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revhuman.v9.2613
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. En P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art (pp. 249-254). Falmer.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K. y Trouche, L. (Eds.) (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b101602
Hanzsek-Brill, M. B. (1997). The relationships among components of elementary teachers’ mathematics education knowledge and their uses of technology in the mathematics classroom [Tesis doctoral]. University of Georgia, Estados Unidos.
Herfort, J. D., Tamborg, A. L. y Meier, F. (2023). Twenty years of research on technology in mathematics education at CERME: a literature review based on a data science approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(1), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10202-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10202-z
Jankvist, U. T. (2015). Changing students’ images of “mathematics as a discipline”. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.02.002
Misfeldt, M., Jankvist, U. y Aguilar, M. (2016). Teachers’ Beliefs about the Discipline of Mathematics and the Use of Technology in the Classroom. International Society of Educational Research, 11(2), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/341
Molina J. G., Rodríguez, M. y Rosas, M. A. (2024). Docentes de matemáticas, sus creencias y su modo de uso de tecnología digital. En D. Caveldilla (Ed.). Nuevos aprendizajes tecnologizados con aplicaciones culturales y didácticas (pp. 251-263). Peter Lang.
Leatham, K. R. (2007). Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about the nature of technology in the classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 7(2/3), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150709556726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150709556726
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. En F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). IAP.
Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos. V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O. y Sträßer, R. (2010). Mathematical Knowledge and Practices Resulting from Access to Digital Technologies. En C. Hoyles y J.-B. Lagrange (eds.), Mathematics Education and Technology– Rethinking the Terrain. The 17th ICMI Study (pp.133-178). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_8
Salazar, C. (2021). ¿Qué aporta la investigación narrativa a los currículos de formación de profesores de matemáticas? Tecné, Episteme, Didaxis: TED, 49(1), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num48-12375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num49-13148
Thurm, D. y Barzel, B. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: A multidimensional analysis of teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x
Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Van Zoest, L. R., Jones, G. A. y Thornton, C. A. (1994). Beliefs about mathematics teaching held by pre-service teachers involved in a first grade mentorship program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217261
Vogels, E. A. (2019, 19 de septiembre). Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life. Pew Researcher Center. https://goo.su/UbW7d
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W. y Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. En K. Lester Frank (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 1169–1207). IAP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juan Gabriel Molina Zavaleta (Autor de Correspondencia); Clara Mayo Juárez, Alejandro Miguel Rosas Mendoza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Funding data
-
Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Grant numbers SIP20241870;;SIP20241870;SIP 20242404