4.000 years of history one click away

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1104

Keywords:

Sustainable Knowledge, Information, Intellectual Resonance, Sustainability, Library, Librarian, Research Progress, Technological Advancement

Abstract

Introduction: This research addresses the impact of research processes in contemporary society, with the aim of understanding how knowledge and technological progress are produced in the 21st century through three thematic axes: information in the digitised society, the evolution of scientific production and the concept of ‘sustainable knowledge’. Methodology: A mixed approach was used, analysing the impact of sustainable knowledge through expert testimony. The research, descriptive in scope, explored phenomena related to the object of study. The design was non-experimental and a semi-structured interview was used as a data collection instrument. Results: A lack of clarity was identified regarding the actors involved in the dynamism of information and knowledge production, which affects the understanding of the process of knowledge creation and dissemination. Discussion: The research underlines the need to approach sustainable knowledge as an integral process, involving not only the production and dissemination of knowledge, but also its intellectual resonance in society. Conclusions: To achieve sustainable development, it is essential to direct the production and dissemination of knowledge, and to foster processes of intellectual resonance that endure over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tomás Mesa Guzmán, Universidad EAN

Sixth semester student of Communication at the Universidad Ean, belonging to the ComTIC research group.

References

Broncano, F. (2000). Mundos Artificiales: Filosofía del Cambio Tecnológico. Ediciones Paidos Iberica.

Center for International Development Jeffrey D Sachs. (2015). Age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

CEPAL | UNESCO. (2020). La educación en tiempos de la pandemia de COVID-19. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/45904

Diéguez, A. (s.f.). Ortega y el mejoramiento genético. Reflexiones sobre las tecnologías de mejoramiento genético al hilo del pensamiento de Ortega y Gasset. Red de investigaciones filosóficas. https://proyectoscio.ucv.es/articulos-filosoficos/ortega-y-el-mejoramiento-genetico-por-antonio-dieguez/#:~:text=Ortega%20considera%20que%20la%20técnica,el%20ser%20humano%20habita%20realmente

FAB festival. (s. f.). FAB24 México. Recuperado 6 de julio de 2024, de https://fab24.fabevent.org/programs/fab-festival

Farfán, P. (6 de febrero de 2024). Comunicación personal.

González, A. (11 de febrero de 2024). Comunicación personal.

Medina, M. (s.f.). Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad en el siglo 21. Los retos de la tecnociencia y la cultura de CTS [Archivo PDF]. https://andoni.garritz.com/documentos/Los%20estudios%20CTS/Medina_CTS_sigloXXI.pdf

Quiroz, N. (20 de febrero de 2021). Las bibliotecas y el conocimiento sostenible en la era digital. Bibliotecoach. https://acortar.link/0W0cl9

Sachs, J. (2015). La era del desarrollo sostenible. Grupo Planeta.

Sachs, J. (2021). Las edades de la globalización. Grupo Planeta.

Sánchez-Criado, T. (2016). La Teoría del Actor-Red. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Suárez, C. (8 de febrero de 2024). Comunicación personal.

The fab foundation. (s. f.). Fabfoundation.org. Recuperado 6 de julio de 2024, de https://fabfoundation.org/about/

United Nations. (s. f.-a). Población | Naciones Unidas.

https://www.un.org/es/global-issues/population

United Nations. (s. f.-b). Sostenibilidad | Naciones Unidas.

https://www.un.org/es/impacto-acad%C3%A9mico/sostenibilidad

Universidad Ean [@Universidad_Ean]. (2024, marzo 21). Transiciones socioecológicas: Urbanismo y Sostenibilidad en Bogotá (español). Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YC_BErgQOhI

World Bank. (s. f.). Desigualdad y prosperidad compartida. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/isp/overview

Published

2025-01-20

How to Cite

Mesa Guzmán, T. (2025). 4.000 years of history one click away. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1104

Issue

Section

Humanism and Social Sciences