From theory to practice: development of metacognition, self-regulation and self-assessment strategies in general chemistry laboratories in university education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1326Keywords:
metacognition, self-regulation, self appraisal, reflective component, Feedback, laboratories, chemical literacy, higher educationAbstract
Introduction: Within the experimental teaching of chemistry, a confirmatory nature of the theory has prevailed, which makes chemical literacy difficult. Therefore, the present study seeks to investigate how the inclusion of a reflective component within the laboratory assessment contributes to promoting metacognition, self-regulation and self-assessment in science prospectives teachers. Methodology: The research is qualitative. It comprises an exploratory-descriptive scope and a Case Study design. The responses of 47 students in the assessments of 3 laboratories within the subject of General Chemistry were analyzed. An appreciation scale is applied to a subsample to determine their perception in relation with the applied pedagogical device. Results: The pupils showed an evolution in their information processing capacity and self-assessment throughout the laboratories. Discussion: This assessment innovation was effective in terms of promoting deeper and more meaningful learning, as well as developing metacognitive and self-regulatory students skills. Positive perceptions by the students, support the usefulness of this approach in chemical literacy. Conclusion: The assessment innovation contributed to improving academic performance, encouraged reflection and promoted more significant learning from the participants.
Downloads
References
Abarro, R. Q., & Asuncion, J. E. (2021). Metacognition in chemistry education. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 03 (95), 1-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.03.95.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.03.95.1
Agustian, H. Y., Finne, L. T., Jørgensen, J. T., Pedersen, M. I., Christiansen, F. V., Gammelgaard, B., & Nielsen, J. A. (2022). Learning outcomes of university chemistry teaching in laboratories: A systematic review of empirical literature. Review of Education, 10, e3360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3360
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928
Azizah, U., & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Metacognitive Skills and Self-Regulated Learning in Pre-Service Teachers: Role of Metacognitive-Based Teaching Materials: Research Article. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 461-476. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.84
Brock, R. (2011). Trabajo práctico en ciencias secundarias: un enfoque mental. https://acortar.link/MDFfl4
Carazo, P. C. M. (2006). El método de estudio de caso: estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica. Pensamiento & gestión(20), 165-193. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=64602005
Dinçol Özgür, S. (2023). The effects of prospective chemistry teachers’ laboratory teaching experiences on their metacognitive thinking skills and perceptions of problem-solving skills. Eur J Psychol Educ . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00760-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00760-y
Dori, Y. J., & Avargil, S. (2015). Promoting metacognitive skills in the context of chemistry education. In Relevant chemistry education (pp. 119-141). Brill. https://acortar.link/2dCbGg DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-175-5_7
Fazriah, S., Irwandi, D., & Fairusi, D. (2021). Relationship of self-regulated learning with student learning outcomes in chemistry study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1836, No. 1, p. 012075). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012075
Feldman-Maggor, Yael. "Identifying self-regulated learning in chemistry classes – a good practice report" Chemistry Teacher International, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, pp. 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0036
Heidbrink, A., & Weinrich, M. (2021). Undergraduate chemistry instructors’ perspectives on their students’ metacognitive development. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00136H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00136H
Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Metacognition in chemistry education: A literature review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6-7), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800087
Millar, R., & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical work: making it more effective. School Science Review, 91(334), 59-64. https://acortar.link/6bSw1V
Ministerio de Educación- Universidad de Concepción. (2020) Informe Final proyecto Elaboración de preguntas de respuesta abierta a partir de estudios de caso para Educación Parvularia, Básica, Media y Especial para su uso en la Evaluación Nacional Diagnóstica de la Formación Inicial Docente
Olakanmi, E. E., & Gumbo, M. T. (2017). The effects of self-regulated learning training on students’ metacognition and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25 (2) 34 - 48. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/11341
Reyes-Cárdenas, F., Ruiz-Herrera, B., Llano Lomas, M., Lechuga Uribe, P., & Mena Zepeda, M. (2021). El aprendizaje de la reacción química: el uso de modelos en el laboratorio. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 39 (2), 0103-122. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3229
Rodríguez Medina, M. A., Poblano-Ojinaga, E. R., Alvarado Tarango, L., González Torres, A., & Rodríguez Borbón, M. I. (2021). Validación por juicio de expertos de un instrumento de evaluación para evidencias de aprendizaje conceptual. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.960
Sampieri, R. H. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill.
Sandi‐Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Stevens, R. H. (2010). Enhancement of Metacognition Use and Awareness by Means of a Collaborative Intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903452922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903452922
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006a). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students [10.1039/B6RP90011A]. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006b). Chemical Literacy: What Does This Mean to Scientists and School Teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1557
Syarifa Fahmina, S., Indriyanti, N., Setyowati, W., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of Chemical Literacy and its Influence in Chemistry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026/pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026
Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.009
Tüysüz, C. (2010). The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students' Achievement and Attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2010, 2 (1), 37-53 https://n9.cl/xqkah
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded Formative assessment. USA: Solution Tree Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Robinson Dinamarca, Verónica Yáñez-Monje
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Funding data
-
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Grant numbers Fondecyt 3230541