Evolution of gender stereotypes in the internal communication processes of companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1543Keywords:
companies, internal communication, gender stereotypes, business reputation, communication processes, artificial intelligence, handling, messagesAbstract
Introduction: In a global and changing world in real time, company communication processes have become essential for safeguarding the good name of business organizations. It is inevitable that these communication processes form proforma areas of messages in an attempt to catch trends and to preserve a reputation at clear risk of manipulation, now increased with the arrival of Artificial Intelligence. Among the stereotypes that are dealt with, that of gender equality is necessarily among those to take into account and take care of from the point of view of the message. Therefore, its detection, analysis and elimination of differences concerns society as a whole and, therefore, business organizations. Objective: The main objective of this research work is to know how companies perceive gender stereotypes. Methodology: As is usual, practical and accurate as far as possible in social sciences, we advance holding onto a qualitative methodology based on conducting in-depth interviews with people management executives, in order to analyze communication habits and their greater or less subjectivity regarding the gender of sender and receiver. Conclusions: The conclusions presented must necessarily be purposeful with the clear objective of contributing to alleviating unnecessary biases.
Downloads
References
Barrientos-Báez, A., Piñeiro-Otero, T. y Porto Renó, D. (2024). Imágenes falsas, efectos reales. Deepfakes como manifestaciones de la violencia política de género [Fake Images, Real Effects: Deepfakes as Manifestations of Gender-based Political Violence]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 82, 01-29. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2024-2278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2278
Barrientos-Báez, A., Báez-García, A. J., Flores-Muñoz, F. y Gutiérrez-Barroso, J. (2018). Gender diversity, corporate governance, and firm behavior: The challenge of emotional management. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.07.001
Barrientos-Báez, A. y Alonso-Luis, X. (2018). Empleo y contratación en España: diferencias de género. Turismo: Revista de Estudios de Turismo de Canarias y Macaronesia, 7, 1-21. http://ijteg.iriarteuniversidad.es/admin/archivos/2018%20(1).pdf
Barrientos-Báez, A., Parra-López, E. y Martínez-González, J. A. (2020). La imagen y empoderamiento de la mujer en el sector turístico. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Comunicación aDResearch ESIC, 22(22), 164-175. https://lc.cx/_E3Vvs DOI: https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-022-09
Bodenschatz, A. y Walkowitz, G. (2021). Slipping on stereotypes-gender effects in the erosion of ethical behavior. Tommorrow´s Research Today, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728551
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391-409. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1020909529486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
Burrell, G. y Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analisis. Heineman.
Caldevilla-Domínguez, D. (2010). La cara interna de la comunicación en la empresa. Visión libros.
Chenet Zuta, M. E., Lalaleo-Analuisa, F. R. y Hurtado Tiza, D. R. (2023). Influencia de la cultura organizacional y las habilidades gerenciales en la calidad del servicio: un análisis crítico de los conflictos en asociaciones de profesores cesantes y jubilados. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 57, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2024.57.e836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2024.57.e836
Cooley, E. y Payne, B. K. (24 de March de 2018). A group is more than the average of its parts: Why existing stereotypes are applied more to the same individuals when viewed in groups than when viewed alone. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756494
Fernández Holgado, J. Ángel, Puentes-Rivera, I. y Fontenla-Pedreira, J. (2022). Relaciones Públicas, Comunicación Política y narrativa audiovisual: Spot electoral del Partido Popular en las elecciones a la Asamblea de Madrid de 2021. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 27, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2022.27.e253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2022.27.e253
Ganga-Contreras, F., Alarcón-Henríquez, N., Soto, R. y Saldivia, C. (2020). Estilos de liderazgo en dirigentes sindicales de la Región Metropolitana de Chile: un análisis desde la perspectiva de género. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(92). www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29065286014
Gismera Tierno, E. y Paredes Serrano, C. (2021). La presencia equilibrada de las mujeres en los consejos de administración de las empresas cotizadas. regulación jurídica y educomunicación como factor coadyuvante de cambio. En J. Sierra Sánchez y J. Gomes Pinto (Coords.), Audiovisual e Industrias Creativas (pp. 817-831). McGraw-Hill.
Graff, A. (2016). Gender ideology: weak concepts, powerful politics. Religion and Gender, 6(2), 268-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/rg.10177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10177
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica. Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Herder. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt7x7vj
Kaur, A. y Singh, N. (2017). Changing behaviour of society towards women empowerment. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, 8(2), 20-24. https://lc.cx/8P-vO-
Kelan, E. (2010). Gender Logic and (Un)doing Gender at Work. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(2), 174-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00459.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00459.x
King, T., Scovelle, A., Priest, N., Meehl, A. y Milner, A. (2021). Gender stereotypes and biases in early childhood: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Earl Childhood, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939121999849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939121999849
Kochan, J. (2013). Subjectivity and emotion in scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33(3), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.05.003
Mackie, M. (1973). Arriving at truth by definition: the case of stereotype inaccuracy. Social Problems, 20(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1973.20.4.03a00040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1973.20.4.03a00040
Martín Martín, V., Galmes Cerezo, M. y Retamosa Ferreiro, M. (2023). La comunicación experiencial como estrategia creativa para promocionar los eventos turísticos españoles. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 28, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e283
Mulatu, D. y Ayalew, S. (2015). Exploring Gender Stereotypes through Managerial Process: Implication for women advancement, in case of Wolaita Sodo University. Scientific Research, an Academic Publisher, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101667
Musicco Nombela, D., Dominici, P., Sarasqueta, G., Gato, M. J., Silveira, M. J. y Díaz Cuesta, J. (2023). La nueva educación universitaria en línea: de lo emocional a la espectacularización. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 508-538. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1980
Paredes Serrano, C. y Gismera Tierno, E. (2021). Relaciones profesionales, redes sociales, derecho a la libertad de expresión, a la intimidad y la propia imagen. En J. Sierra Sánchez y A. Barrientos-Báez (Coords.), Cosmovisión de la comunicación en redes sociales en la era postdigital (pp. 883-902). McGraw-Hill.
Pereira, V., Hadjielias, E., Christofi, M. y Vrontis, D. (2023). A systematic literature review on the impact of artificial intelligence on workplace outcomes: A multi-process perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100857
Phelan, J. y Rudman, L. (2010). Reactions to ethnic deviance: The role of backlash in racial stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018304
Phillips, S., O´Connor, M. y Vafaei, A. (2023). Women suffer but men die: survey data exploring whether this self-reported health paradox is real or an artefact of gender stereotypes. BMC Public Health, 23(94). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15011-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15011-4
Portela López, J. L. y Rodríguez Monroy, C. (2023). El neuroconsumidor: una revisión narrativa de la bibliografía a la luz de los patrones mentales y emocionales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 34-56. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs.2023.1913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs.2023.1913
Randall, D. y Gibson, A. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: a review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382838
Rössler, W., Koch, U., Lauber, C. K., Hass, A., Atlwegg, M., Ajdacic-Gross, V. y Landolt, K. (2010). The mental health of female sex workers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01533.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01533.x
Ruiz Olabuénaga, J. I. y Ispizua Uribarri, M. A. (1989). La descodificación de la vida cotidiana. Deustuko Unibertsitatea.
Schniter, E. y Shields, T. (2020). Gender, Stereotypes, and Trust in Communication. Human Nature, 31(3), 296-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09376-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09376-3
Sherman, J., Stroessner, S., Conrey, F. y Azam, O. (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.607
Todd, A., Galinsky, A. y Bodehausen, G. (January de 2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30(1). https://lc.cx/Z3GzKh DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.94
Torres-Mancera, R., Martínez-Rodrigo, E. y Amaral Santos, C. (2023). Sostenibilidad femenina y startups: análisis de la comunicación del liderazgo de mujeres emprendedoras en España y Portugal. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 474-490. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1978
Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, R., Blackbum, A., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C. y Hohnson, J. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. Plos One, 13(6), e0198606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606
Wilches, J., Guerrero, H. y Niño, C. (2024). Emociones políticas y narrativas prototípicas: TikTok en las campañas políticas, estudio de caso. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 82, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2234
Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall.
Zúñiga, F., Mora Poveda, D. A. y Llerena Llerena, W. V. (2023). El Big Data y su implicación en el marketing. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 56, 302-321. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e832
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cristina Paredes Serrano (Autor de Correspondencia); Sheila Liberal Ormaechea, Eduardo Gismera Tierno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).