The Integral Protection of Children and Adolescents in Ecuadorian Case Law: Analysis and Application

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2483

Keywords:

comprehensive protection, children's rights, Ecuadorian jurisprudence, best interests of the child, Constitutional Court, rights-based approach, comprehensive protection doctrine, child justice

Abstract

Introduction: This article analyzes the comprehensive protection of children and adolescents (CHI) in Ecuadorian jurisprudence, addressing how the courts have interpreted and applied the constitutional and regulatory principles related to their rights. Objective: Through a critical review, it examines the evolution of the legal approach toward a doctrine of comprehensive protection, in contrast to previous welfare-based models. Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative approach, based on documentary analysis of rulings issued by the Constitutional Court and other judicial bodies, as well as a review of national regulations and international human rights instruments. Results: Significant progress is evident in the recognition of the best interests of the child as a guiding principle, as well as in the progressive incorporation of a rights-based approach in judicial decisions. However, challenges persist in the uniform application of these standards at all jurisdictional levels. Discussion: The need to strengthen the training of justice officials and consolidate jurisprudential criteria that guarantee consistency in the interpretation and application of children and adolescents' rights is highlighted. Conclusion: Although case law has helped position comprehensive protection as a central axis of the legal treatment of children and adolescents, its full implementation requires institutional reforms, sustained judicial commitment, and comprehensive public policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Basic Books.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). La ecología del desarrollo humano: Experimentos por naturaleza y diseño. Harvard University Press.

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Registro Oficial No. 449.

Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño. (1989). Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas.

Código de la Niñez y Adolescencia. (2003). Registro Oficial No. 737.

Ley Orgánica 1/1996, de Protección Jurídica del Menor. Boletín Oficial del Estado, No. 15, 1996.

Ley de Protección de los Derechos de la Niñez. (2018). Diario Oficial de la República de Chile.

Masten, A. S. (2001). Magia ordinaria: Procesos de resiliencia en el desarrollo. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.227

Nussbaum, M. (2006). Fronteras de la justicia: Discapacidad, nacionalidad y pertenencia a la especie. Harvard University Press.

Piaget, J. (1952). Los orígenes de la inteligencia en los niños. International Universities Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). Teoría de la justicia. Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y libertad. Alfred A. Knopf.

SENPLADES. (2013). Plan Nacional del Buen Vivir 2013-2017. Quito: Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo.

UNICEF. (2004). Estado mundial de la infancia 2004. Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia.

UNESCO. (2015). Educación para todos 2000-2015: Logros y desafíos. UNESCO.

WHO. (2003). Atención a niños y adolescentes con trastornos mentales: Estableciendo direcciones de la OMS. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Martínez Pérez, O., & Freire Gaibor, F. (2025). The Integral Protection of Children and Adolescents in Ecuadorian Case Law: Analysis and Application. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2483

Issue

Section

Cover articles