Professional identity of social educators based on dialogic training actions with an intergenerational perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-452

Keywords:

educational innovation, intergenerational dialogue, employability, social education, discussion, dialogic education, higher education, professional identity

Abstract

Introduction: The youth unemployment data in Spain is especially serious in Social Education, widening the gap between the university and the development of the profession. The objective of our study is to determine the value for employability of a discussion held at a Spanish university, a training strategy based on the intergenerational dialogue of active professionals, students, teachers and researchers. Methodology: An exploratory-ethnographic study of the event was carried out, triangulating the analysis of the participants' oral discourses and the observation of their interaction. Results: The study, on the one hand, characterizes the current professional identity of the social educator, highlighting the value of soft skills (learning to learn, collaborating and creating international networks). On the other hand, it establishes the scope of this dialogic pedagogy for the social construction of knowledge and community development. Conclusion: This study defines some curricular (soft skills) and pedagogical (dialogical education) elements to design training programs for employability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sergio Reyes-Angona, Complutense University of Madrid


PhD in Educational Innovation (Tecnológico de Monterrey, 2019) and PhD in Didactic Innovation in the Knowledge Society (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2015). Member of the Mexican National System of Researchers SNI-Level I (2021-2025), with two biannual postdoctoral fellowships, at the Autonomous University of Baja California (2019-2021) and at the University of Lleida (Maria Zambrano Contract, 2022-2024). 15 years as professor and researcher at different universities in Mexico (Tec de Monterrey, Universidad de las Américas-Puebla, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California). Currently, visiting professor at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid and collaborator of the Master in Educational Technology at Tec de Monterrey. Line of research: collaborative methodologies and technologies for teacher training.

Carmen Saban Vera, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

She received her PhD in Information Sciences in 1995 and in Pedagogy in 2009, and her PhD in Pedagogy from the UCM. She has developed her research and professional career at an international level, in centers such as UNESCO (Department of Continuing Education), the Faculty of Communication at the University of Canberra (Australia), the Department of Information Technology for Human Development of the Organization of American States (OAS, Washington), CEDEAL (Center for Latin American Studies), and Casa de América, among others. Since 2007, she has been associated with the Faculty of Education in Social Education. Her publications address different fields related to continuing education, continuing training, education for sustainable development, as well as the inclusion of new technologies in education.

Rosa Sobrino Callejo, Complutense University of Madrid

Educator (UCM, 1999), specialized in family therapy (Own Degree UCM, 2006), she obtained her PhD in Education with an Extraordinary Award (UCM, 2016) researching the processes inherent to the teaching and learning of linguistic communication competence and diversity in literacy of the school population. Since 2009, she has combined research with teaching at the Faculty of Education (UCM). The professional fields in which she works are associated with permanent teacher training programs and socio-educational intervention at national and Latin American levels; all of them provide her with ideal research contexts to transfer to the research in which she participates, publishing in the fields of educational innovation, organizational development, curricular sustainability and educational inclusion.

References

Alexander, R. J. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140

Alt, D., Naamati-Schneider, L. y Weishut, D. J. N. (2023). Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, 48(12), 1901-1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203

ANECA. (2021). Marco para la autoevaluación de las universidades en la mejora de sus actuaciones en materia de empleo y empleabilidad de sus egresados y egresadas. Secretaría General Técnica/Ministerio de Universidades. https://bit.ly/3MjYDaT

Arribas-Cubero, H., Frutos-de Miguel, J. y González-González, X. M. (2021). Aprendizaje-Servicio en experiencias intergeneracionales: un estudio de caso en la formación de Educación Social. Estudios pedagógicos, 47(4), 245-269. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052021000400245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052021000400245

Bauman, Z. (2000). Modernidad líquida. FCE.

Canal UGR (2 de julio de 2018). Macrosad y la UGR impulsan una cátedra pionera en España sobre estudios intergeneracionales. https://canal.ugr.es/noticia/macrosad-ugr-catedra-estudios-intergeneracionales

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.

Eslava-Suanes, M. S., González-López, I. y de-León-Huertas, C. (2018) Discussion of competences at university level: review of the competency profile of social, Cultura y Educación, 30(2), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1452869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1452869

Fernández Morales, K., Reyes-Angona, S., López-Ornelas, M. y Organista, J. (2021). Laboratorios de innovación social: escenarios disruptivos. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.

Flick, U. (2015). El diseño de investigación cualitativa. Morata.

Fuentes Camacho, M.T. (2011). La observación de las prácticas educativas como elemento de evaluación y de mejora de la calidad en la formación inicial y continua del profesorado. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(3), 237–258. http://red-u.net/redu/files/journals/1/articles/248/public/248-647-1-PB.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.11228

Galafat-Hurtado, Á., Rute-Vega, N., Aguaded-Ramírez, E. y Carrillo-Rosúa, J. (2016). Validación de un registro de observación, para analizar interacciones de éxito, en un grupo interactivo en comunidades de aprendizaje. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 27(1), 83-98. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=338246652006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.27.num.1.2016.17009

García García, N. y Nicolás Mora, R.M. (2012). Las estrategias y los instrumentos de evaluación desde el enfoque formativo. Dirección General de Desarrollo Curricular/Secretaría de Educación Pública.

Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. y Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395–429. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NR DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

Gutiérrez, M. y Hernández, D. (2013a). Los beneficios de los programas intergeneracionales desde la perspectiva de los profesionales. Pedagogía Social. Revista universitaria, 21, 213-235. https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/147677

Gutiérrez, M. y Hernández, D. (2013b). Las relaciones intergeneracionales en la sociedad actual: un imperativo necesario. Educación Social. Revista de Intervención Socioeducativa, 55, 135-145. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/EducacioSocial/article/view/271050/368933

INE. (2022). Encuesta de Población Activa. Cuarto trimestre de 2021. https://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/daco4211/epa0421.pdf

International Association of Social Educators. (2022). Competence profile. http://aieji.net/media/1093/competence-profile-2022.pdf

Jackson, D. y Dean, B. A. (2022). Employability-related activities beyond the curriculum: how participation and impact vary across diverse student cohorts. Higher Education, 86, 1151-1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00966-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00966-x

Kump, S. y Krasovec, S. (2010). Intergenerational community learning, education and cooperation. Teorija in praksa, 47(6), 1171-1194. http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20106_kump_jelenc-krasovec.pdf

Lave, J. y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lirio Castro, J., Alonso González, D., Herranz Aguayo, I. y Arias Fernández, E. (2014). Perceptions concerning intergenerational education from the perspective of participants. Educational Gerontology, 40, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.802182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.802182

Lucas, M., Gunawardena, Ch. y Moreira, A. (2013). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behaviour, 30, 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050

MacCallum, J., Palmer, D., Wright, P., Cumming-Potvin, W., Brooker, M. y Tero, C. (2010). Australian Perspectives: Community Building Through Intergenerational Exchange Programs. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 8(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350771003741899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350771003741899

Martínez Heredia, N. y Rodríguez García, A. M. (2018). Educación intergeneracional: un nuevo reto para la formación del profesorado. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 17(33), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20181733nmartinez7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20181733nmartinez7

Martin, M. (Ed.). (2018). Internal Quality Assurance: Enhancing higher education quality and graduate employability. IIEP/UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261356/PDF/261356eng.pdf.multi

Morin, E. (2002). La cabeza bien puesta. Repensar la reforma. Reformar el pensamiento. Nueva Visión.

Moravec, J. (2013). Knowmad Society. Education Futures.

Novotný, P. y Brücknerová, K. (2014). Intergenerational learning among teachers: an interaction perspective. Studia paedagogica, 19(4), 46-79. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2014-4-3

Olivares-García, Mª. A., García-Segura, S., Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. y Mérida-Serrano, R. (2020). El e-portafolio profesional: una herramienta facilitadora en la transición al empleo de estudiantes de Grado en Educación Social en la Universidad de Córdoba. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 31(3), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.31.num.3.2020.29265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.31.num.3.2020.29265

Pinazo, S. (2009). Beneficios de los Programas Intergeneracionales. Espai Social, 9, 13-16. https://www.coeescv.net/docs/Revistas%20EspaiSocial/espai_social_09.pdf

Reimers, F. M. y Schleicher, A. (2020). Schooling Disrupted, Schooling Rethought: How the COVID-19 Pandemic is Changing Education. OECD. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/education_continuity_v3.pdf

Ruiz-Corbella, M. Bautista-Cerro, M. J. y García, M. (2019). Prácticas profesionales y la formación en competencias para la empleabilidad. Contextos Educativos, 23, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3560

Sáez-Carreras, J. (2009). La intergeneracionalidad o la potencialidad de un concepto inexplorado. Espai Social, 9, 4-7. https://www.coeescv.net/docs/Revistas%20EspaiSocial/espai_social_09.pdf

Scott, C. L. (2015). El Futuro del aprendizaje 3: ¿Qué tipo de pedagogías se necesitan para el siglo XXI? Investigación y prospectiva en educación. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243126_spa

Tang, K. N. (2019). Beyond Employability: Embedding Soft Skills in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(2), 1-9. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v18i2/1821.pdf

UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good? https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232697

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Vargas Manrique, P. J. (2016). Una educación desde la otredad. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 14(17), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.9

Wegerif, R. (2019). Towards a dialogic theory of education for the Internet Age. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif y L. Major (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education (pp. 14-26). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677-3

Published

2024-07-23

How to Cite

Reyes-Angona, S., Saban Vera, C., & Sobrino Callejo, R. (2024). Professional identity of social educators based on dialogic training actions with an intergenerational perspective. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-452

Issue

Section

INNOVATION IN TRAINING PROFILES FOR THE NEEDS OF LEARNERS

Funding data