Implementation and Evaluation of the Academic Improvement Program in a Private University in Western Mexico. Reactive measure to avoid university desertion.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-555Keywords:
Academic Improvement Program, Desertion, Private University, Permanence, Academic Performance, Academic Accompaniment, Most Significant Change, MexicoAbstract
Introduction: This research aims to expose the results of the implementation of the Academic Improvement Programme (PMA) in a private university in western Mexico, designed to prevent student dropout. The study focused on students who entered for the first time on a face-to-face basis after the COVID-19 confinement. Methodology: A qualitative and interpretative approach was used, applying the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique. The study, with a case study perspective, involved 12 undergraduate law students who did not achieve the required academic performance and committed to participate in the LDC. Results: The results revealed five significant changes among the students: a) personal development and growth; b) emotional balance; c) application of study methods; d) recognition and gratitude for the personalised attention received; and e) recovery of motivation and self-confidence. Discussion: The results underline the effectiveness of PMA in improving students' well-being and academic performance, highlighting its potential to address post-confinement difficulties. Conclusions: Based on these results, it is proposed to continue applying PMA to all students in the different schools and faculties of the university, given its positive impact on student performance and well-being.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-Pérez, P. y López-Aguilar, D. (2019). Perfil de ingreso y problemas de adaptación del alumnado universitario según la perspectiva del profesorado. REOP, 30, 46–63. https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/reop/article/view/26272/pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.30.num.3.2019.26272
Anadón, M. y Valles Martínez, M. S. (2005). La investigación llamada “cualitativa”: de la dinámica de su evolución a los innegables logros y los cuestionamientos presentes. In Reis: Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas, 26(2), 198-211. https://acortar.link/iz4f9e
Beer, C. y Lawson, C. (2017). The problem of student attrition in higher education: An alternative perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177171
Belando-Montoro, M. R., Naranjo-Crespo, M. y Carrasco-Temiño, M. A. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to the retention and participation of socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged university students. An international systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101968
Bonilla-García, M. y López-Suárez, A. (2016). Ejemplificación del proceso metodológico de la teoría fundamentada. Cinta de Moebio, 57, 305-315. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2016000300006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2016000300006
Castillo-Sánchez, M., Gamboa-Araya, R. y Hidalgo-Mora, R. (2020). 23.Factors that influence student dropout and failing grades in a university mathematics course. Uniciencia, 34(1), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.15359/RU.34-1.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.34-1.13
Castro-Montoya, B. A., Lopera-Gómez, C. M., Manrique-Hernández, R. D. y González Gómez, D. (2021). A competing dropout and graduation risk survival analysis of undergraduate students at a private university in Medellín (Colombia). Formacion Universitaria, 14(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000100081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000100081
Chacón-Vargas, É. y Roldán-Villalobos, G. (2021). Factors affecting the academic performance of freshmen in the ITCR general mathematics course. Uniciencia, 35(1), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.15359/RU.35-1.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-1.16
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry y Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Davies, R. y Jess, D. (2011). Técnica del “Cambio Más Significante” (MSC, por sus siglas en inglés) Guía para su uso
Dávila, R., Agüero, E., Portillo, H. y Omar, Q. (2022). Deserción Universitaria de los Estudiantes de una Universidad Peruana. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(2), 421–427. https://acortar.link/YrGGeH
Farias Macias, A. A., Farias Macias, A. A., Pazmiño Pazmiño, H. C. y Mera Zambrano, S. E. (2022). Educational dropout generated as a result of the covid-19 pandemic in educational centers in Ecuador. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(7), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i7.499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i7.499
Ferreyra, M. M., Avitabile, C., Botero Álvarez, J., Haimovich Paz, F. y Urzúa, S. (2017). Momento decisivo: la educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe. Resúmen. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial. Licencia: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO
Fuentes-Balderrama, J. y Rivera- Heredia, M. (2022). Factores personales, contextuales y académicos asociados a la reprobación en educación superior. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 27(95), 1039–1062. https://bit.ly/3Wa6C1X
Galbán-Lozano, S. E. y García-Bejar, L. (2022). Experiences of University Professors Studying for a Doctoral Degree in the Mexican Context. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.28945/5028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/5028
Gallegos, J. A., Campos, N. A., Canales, K. A. y González, E. N. (2018). ACS8E Factores Determinantes en la Deserción Universitaria. Caso Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas de la Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (Chile). Formación Universitaria, 11(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062018000300011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000300011
Glaser, B. G. y Strauss, A. L. (2006). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Library of Congress
Grebennikov, L. y Shah, M. (2013). Student voice: using qualitative feedback from students to enhance their university experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774353
Hernández Chávez, G., Cuauhtémoc, M. y Sánchez-García, J. (2020). Perfil de alumnos con abandono escolar en una universidad privada mexicana. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 97-121. https://cpue.uv.mx/index.php/cpue/article/view/2703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25009/cpue.v0i31.2703
Hoff, N., Olson, A. y Peterson, R. L. (2015, March). Dropout Screening and Early Warning. Topic Brief. Lincoln, NE: Student Engagement Project, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Nebraska Department of Education. https://bit.ly/3W96mQZ
Hughes, G. y Smail, O. (2015). Which aspects of university life are most and least helpful in the transition to HE? A qualitative snapshot of student perceptions. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.971109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.971109
Jones, H. (2020). When the journey is as important as the destination: Time-averaged retention as an alternate measure of student engagement and program impact. Student Success, 11(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i1.1464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i1.1464
Martinic, R. (2019). ¿Qué hay tras la permanencia universitaria? Los cambios más significativos en el acompañamiento. Educ. Pesqui, 45, 1–20. https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/XfS3NyZ8Snpw9CyX3Yp8tKD/?lang=es DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201945190724
Ochoa, E., Rodríguez, A. y García, L. (2023). Rendimiento académico: factor de riesgo de deserción a analizar en una universidad privada en el Occidente de México. En E. Brito.
OECD (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
Paez Manjarrez, P., Maldonado Torres, F. A., Imperial Sosa, M. K., Samaniego Ojeda, J., Exzacarías Martínez, J. A. y Macías Villanueva, A. V. (2023). Diseño, construcción y validación de un instrumento para medir factores de riesgo en estudiantes universitarios de primer ingreso. Revista Complutense de Educación, 34(2), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.79326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.79326
Perander, K., Londen, M., Holm, G. y Tiihonen, S. (2020). Becoming a university student: An emotional rollercoaster. Hogre Utbildning, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v10.1462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v10.1462
Roberts, S. (2011). Traditional practice for non-traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy in higher education retention. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2010.540320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.540320
Russell, L. y Jarvis, C. (2019). Student withdrawal, retention and their sense of belonging; their experience in their words. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 4(3), 494-525. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2019.3.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2019.3.3
Thumiki, V. R. R. (2019). Student dropout from foundation program at modern college of business & science, Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p118
Urbina-Nájera, A. B., Camino-Hampshire, J. C. y Cruz-Barbosa, R. (2020). Deserción escolar universitaria: Patrones para prevenirla aplicando minería de datos educativa. RELIEVE, 26(1). http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.16061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.16061
Velázquez Narváez, Y. y González Medina, M. A. (2017). Factors associated with student persistence: The case of the UAMM-UAT. Revista de La Educación Superior, 46(184), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.11.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eva Gricelda Ochoa Cedeño, Alejandro Rodríguez Magaña, Ligia García Bejar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).