Comparison of the capacity to innovate of manufacturing and non-manufacturing companies.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-563Keywords:
Innovation capacity, product innovation, innovation in processes, manufacturing companies, service companies, organizational dimension, functional dimension, knowledge dimensionAbstract
Introduction: Companies in countries with emerging economies face challenges to remain competitive in a globalized market, affected by limited access to advanced technology, insufficient technical training, and obstacles in integrating innovative processes. The objective is to compare manufacturing companies in the metalworking sector and non-manufacturing companies in the Ecuadorian industry, establishing correlations between innovation capacity and innovation results in products and processes. Methodology: The study, cross-sectional and descriptive, with purposive non-probability sampling, included 88 manufacturing companies and 113 non-manufacturing companies. Data were collected through surveys to managers, evaluating innovation capacity with a Likert scale. For the correlational analysis, the Kendall Tau_b coefficient was used. Results: The results indicate that manufacturing companies have a greater capacity to innovate, especially in incremental improvements in products and processes. Discussion: These companies, better equipped to use internal resources and technical capabilities, reinforce theories on the importance of investment in R&D and technology. More investments in R&D and technical training, as well as public policies to support these areas, are justified. Conclusions: The research confirms that the functional dimension is key to innovative results, providing a framework to measure innovation and establish competitive strategies in the business sector.
Downloads
References
Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press. https://acortar.link/XIdarC
Argothy, A., Jarrin, H., Vásconez, R. y Pérez Briceño, J. C. (2023). Innovación como determinante de la productividad en el sector metalmecánico de Ecuador. Medwave, 23(S1). https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2023.S1.UTA315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2023.S1.UTA315
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bell, M. y Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological Acumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrast Between Developed and Developing Countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2), 157-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/2.2.157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/2.2.157
Çaldağ, M., Gökalp, E. y Alkiş, N. (2019). Analyzing determinants of open government-based technologies and applications adoption in the context of organizations. Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE), 50-56. https://n9.cl/xyutm
Del Giudice, Carayannis, E. y Maggioni, V. (2016). Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9496-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9496-1
De Martino, M. y Magnotti, F. (2018). The innovation capacity of small food firms in Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 362-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2017-0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2017-0041
Damanpour, F. y Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00227
Expósito, A. y Sanchis-Llopis, J. (2019). The relationship between types of innovation and SMEs’ performance: a multi-dimensional empirical assessment. Eurasian Business Review, 9(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-018-00116-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-018-00116-3
FocusEconomics. (2024). Ecuador Economy Overview: Outlook & Reports.
https://www.focus-economics.com/
Guan, J. y Ma, N. (2023). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
Huang, W., Yin, K., Yun, I., Nureen, N., Irfan, M. y Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Relating Sustainable Business Development Practices and Information Management in Promoting Digital Green Innovation: Evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930138
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos y Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo. Encuesta Nacional de Actividades de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación - ACTI 2015. https://anda.inec.gob.ec/anda/index.php/catalog/762
Kafetzopoulos, D. y Psomas, E. (2015). The impact of innovation capability on the performance of manufacturing companies the Greek case. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(1), 104-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2012-0117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2012-0117
Kim, J. (2022). Which is the most effective innovation protection method for different types of product innovation? Evidence from South Korean manufacturing firms. Appl Econ Lett, 29(7), 665-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1922583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1922583
Kim, D. H., Wu, Y. C. y Lin, S. C. (2024). Trade openness and green technology: The extent of trade openness and environmental policy matter. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2024.2323656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2024.2323656
López Inda, K. A., Alvarado Altamirano, S., Fong Reynoso, C. y González Álvarez, E. (2020). Capital social en la perspectiva de la teoría de recursos y capacidades: un análisis bibliométrico. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.9007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.9007
Lugones, G., Gutti, P. y Le Clech, N. (2007). Indicadores de capacidades tecnológicas en América Latina. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://acortar.link/XIdarC
Malekpour, M., Yazdani, M., Kordkheili, H. G. y Rezvani, H. (2022). Un modelo integral de estrategia de innovación de productos. ESIC Digital Economy and Innovation Journal, 1(2), e010. https://doi.org/10.55234/edeij-1-2-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55234/edeij-1-2-010
Martínez-Román, J. y Romero, I. (2017). Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities. Review of Managerial Science, 11(3), 543-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0196-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0196-x
Maya Carrillo, M., Suntaxi Imbaquingo, C., Ramos, V. y Guerrón, R. (2023). Influence of Technological Capabilities on Business Innovation in Ecuador. Applied Technologies, 1757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24978-5_31
Maya Carrillo, M., Maldonado, B., Ramos, V., Castillo, M. y Cedeño, L. (2024). Measurement of Innovation Capacity in Small and Medium Manufacturing Companies. En Emerging Research in Intelligent Systems. CIT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 903). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52258-1_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52258-1_7
Mendoza-Silva, A. (2021). Innovation capability: A sociometric approach. Social Networks, 64, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.08.004
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. y Umemoto, K. (2014). A theory of organizational knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7-8). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1996.025472
Nureen, N., Sun, H., Irfan, M., Nuta, A. y Malik, M. (2023). Digital transformation: fresh insights to implement green supply chain management, eco technological innovation, and collaborative capability in manufacturing sector of an emerging economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 78168-78181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27796-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27796-3
Ode, E. y Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
OECD. (2018). Manual de Oslo: The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Paker, F., Alppay, C. y Sertyeşilişik, B. (2018). Use of the AHP Methodology in Vehicle Design Process Dynamics: Determination of the Most Effective Concept Phases for the New Automotive Product. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2018.84017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2018.84017
Robledo Velásquez, J. (2020). Introducción a la Gestión de la Tecnología y la Innovación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín.
Saeed, M.A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M.M., Tabassum, H. y Nauman, S. (2021). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 600-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0058
Saunila, M., Ukko, J. y Rantanen, H. (2012). Innovation capability and its measurement in finnish SMEs. En H. Rantanen (Ed.), Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications (pp. 417-435). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_21
Schumpeter, J. A. (2021). The theory of economic development. Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146766
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. y Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://acortar.link/XIdarC DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Turner, M. y Javed, A. (2023). Technological Disruption and Change Management: Navigating Uncertainty in the Digital Age. The Management Science Letter, 10(1), 65-75.
Utterback, J. y Afuah, A. (1995). The Dynamic "Diamond": A Technological Innovation Perspective. The International Center for Research on the Management of Technology, 1-19. https://acortar.link/XIdarC
Wang, L., Jin, J. y Banister, D. (2019). Resources, state ownership and innovation capability: Evidence from Chinese automakers. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12305
Wardani, N. (2022). Resource Based View (RBV) in Improving Company Strategic Capacity. Research Horizon, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.2.6.2022.587-596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.2.6.2022.587-596
Weber, B. y Heidenreich, S. (2018). When and with whom to cooperate? Investigating effects of cooperation stage and type on innovation capabilities and success. Long Range Planning, 5(2), 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.003
Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171-174. https://acortar.link/VadnSH DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160303
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. Geneva: WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48220
Zapata, K., Nieves, W. y Vega, A. (2022). Manufactura y Crecimiento Económico en Ecuador, 1990-2019: Validez de la primera ley de Kaldor. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 5(1), 169-178. https://acortar.link/XIdarC DOI: https://doi.org/10.62452/5g9btj68
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maribel Maya Carrillo, Jesús Tapia, Betzabe Maldonado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).