Exploring change in teacher mathematical discourse using a hypothetical learning trajectory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-759Keywords:
mathematical discourse, analytical scaffolding, social scaffolding, hypothetical learning trajectories, actual learning trajectories, pedagogical strategies, reflective learning, discourse changeAbstract
Introduction: The aim of this paper is to identify characteristics of mathematical discourse in the classroom after the design and during the implementation of a teacher's hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT). Methodology: For the data analysis, a method of data triangulation was used that included analysis of video transcripts, reports of observations made by the researchers, questionnaires, interviews and the design of the HLT. Teacher-student interactions were coded according to teacher-student communication flow; teacher-class. Results: From class one to class two a shift in vertical information flow from individual to group and a better balance between analytical and social scaffolding was identified. Discussion: The design of the HLT favored the teacher's reflection, who expressed characteristics of his class, which coincides with the purposes of the design of an HLT. Conclusions: The study can be useful for the teacher's self-assessment of the characteristics and effectiveness of his teaching, the importance of prior reflection on what can happen in the classroom, including the difficulties of the students, which will allow him to have elements to respond to these situations.
Downloads
References
Campbell. T. (2021). An examination of discourse analytic methods in the context of mathematical group work, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2021.1944681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1944681
Demirci, S. y Baki, A. (2023). Characterizing mathematical discourse according to teacher and student interactions: The core of mathematical discourse. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 144-164. DOI.org/10.33902/JPR.202321852
Fennema, E. y Franke, M. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.
Leikin, R. y Dinur, S. (2003). Patterns of flexibility: Teachers’ behavior in mathematical discussion. En M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1-11). University of Pisa and ERME.
Nathan, M. y Knuth, E. (2003). A Study of Whole Classroom Mathematical Discourse and Teacher Change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207, DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_03
Raymond, A. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.5.0550
Schifter, D. y Simon, M. (1992). Assessing teachers’ development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 187–198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(92)90008-Q
Sfard, A. y Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as Communication: Rethinking Learning-by-Talking Through Multi-Faceted Analysis of Students' Mathematical Interactions, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42-76, DOI: 10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
Silver, E. y Smith, M. (1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. En P.C. Elliott, (Ed.), Yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 20–28). Reston.
Slavin, R. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
Simon, M. y Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104, DOI: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
Stylianides, A. y Stylianides, G. (2018). Addressing key and persistent problems of students’ learning in the area of proof. En A. J. Stylianides y G. Harel (Eds.), Advances in mathematics education research on proof and proving: An international perspective (pp. 99-113). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70996-3_7
Stylianides, G. y Stylianides, A. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 314–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0314
Tabach, M. y Schwarz, B. (2018). Professional development of mathematics teachers towards the facilitation of small-group collaboration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 273–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9796-x
Whisper (2024). Turboscribe.ai. [software]. https://turboscribe.ai/es/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Martha Leticia García Rodríguez; Juan Gabriel Herrera Alva (Autor de Correspondencia)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Funding data
-
Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Grant numbers 20240074