Argumentos a favor de permitir o prohibir el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa por estudiantes. Una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2155Palabras clave:
inteligencia, artificial, generativa, estudiantes, argumentos, educación, efectos, gestiónResumen
Introducción: Los estudiantes han encontrado en la inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) una herramienta poderosa para realizar sus actividades; sin embargo, los líderes de las instituciones educativas las están prohibiendo o evitando debido, principalmente, a que carecen de los argumentos necesarios para tomar decisiones. Es por esto que el objetivo de la investigación es determinar los argumentos para permitir o prohibir el uso de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa por estudiantes. Metodología: Se realiza una revisión sistemática de la literatura a 149 artículos bajo la metodología PRISMA. Resultados: Los hallazgos demuestran que hay sólidos argumentos a favor que los estudiantes utilicen las IAG, a pesar de existir algunas consecuencias negativas de no controlarlas. Discusión: La principal implicancia radica en la confirmación de la existencia de sólidos argumentos en favor que los estudiantes utilicen estas herramientas debido a los múltiples beneficios que genera en el proceso de aprendizaje. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos señalan que las IAG son herramientas poderosas que sí generan grandes beneficios para los estudiantes, y cuyas debilidades o falencias pueden ser superadas con la debida supervisión, inversión, elaboración de reformas institucionales, uso controlado, establecimiento de manuales y parámetros de uso y aspectos ético.
Descargas
Citas
Abbas, M., Jam, F. y Khan, T. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 21, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Abouammoh, N., Alhasan, K., Aljamaan, F., Raina, R., Malki, K., Altamimi, I., Muaygil, R., Wahabi, H., Jamal, A., Alhaboob, A., Assiri, R., Al-Tawfiq, J., Al-Eyadhy, A., Soliman, M. y Temsah, M. (2024). Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Educ, 11, e63400. http://doi.org/10.2196/63400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/63400
Acosta, B., Arbulú, C., Huamaní, O., Arbulú, M. y Paredes, A. (2024). Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320
Agyare, B., Asare, J., Kraishan, A., Nkrumah, I. y Adjekum, D. (2025). A cross-national assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) Chatbot user perceptions in collegiate physics education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100365
Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students’ perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203
Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Lee, I., Sindato, V., Kim, G., Blumofe, R. y Breazeal, C. (2021). Children as Creators, Thinkers and Citizens in an AI-Driven Future. Computers and Education: AI, 2, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100040
Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H. y Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
An, S., Zhang, S., Guo, T., Lu, S., Zhang, W. y Cai, Z. (2025). Impacts of generative AI on student teachers' task performance and collaborative knowledge construction process in mind mapping-based collaborative environment. Computers and Education, 227, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105227
Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. y Andoh, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346
Arias, D., Ramos, T. y Cangalaya, L. (2024). Análisis y tendencias en el uso de chatbots y agentes conversacionales en el campo de la educación: una revisión bibliométrica. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 26(41), 242-260. https://acortar.link/vBzUUW DOI: https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v26i41.5135
Aryadoust, V., Zakaria, A. y Jia, Y. (2024). Investigating the affordances of OpenAI’s large language model in developing listening assessments. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100204
Baglivo, F., De Angelis, L., Casigliani, V., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G. y Rizzo, C. (2023). Exploring the Possible Use of AI Chatbots in Public Health Education: Feasibility Study. JMIR Med Educ, 9, e51421. http://doi.org/10.2196/51421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51421
Bell, R. y Bell, H. (2023). Entrepreneurship education in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship Education, 6, 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-023-00099-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-023-00099-x
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: AI, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
Bicknell, B., Butler, D., Whalen, S., Ricks, J., Dixon, C., Clark, A., Spaedy, O., Skelton, A., Edupuganti, N., Dzubinski, L., Tate, H., Dyess, G., Lindeman, B. y Lehmann, L. (2024). ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e63430. https://doi.org/10.2196/63430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/63430
Bland, T. (2025). Enhancing Medical Student Engagement Through Cinematic Clinical Narratives: Multimodal Generative AI–Based Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 11, e63865. https://doi.org/10.2196/63865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/63865
Blesa, A., Ripollés, M. y Boughattas, Y. (2024). La inteligencia artificial en la educación superior. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 22(2), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2024.23133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2024.23133
Bukar, U., Sayeed, M., Razak, S., Yogarayan, S. y Amodu, O. (2024). An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1845. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1845
Caccavale, F., Gargalo, C., Kager, J., Larsen, S., Gernaey, K. y Krühne, U. (2025). ChatGMP: A case of AI chatbots in chemical engineering education towards the automation of repetitive tasks. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100354
Chan, S., Lo, N. y Wong, A. (2024). Enhancing university level English proficiency with generative AI: Empirical insights into automated feedback and learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep541. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15607
Chan, V. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in a writing intensive course for undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 57, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.003
Chauncey, S. y McKenna, H. (2023). A framework and exemplars for ethical and responsible use of AI Chatbot technology to support teaching and learning. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182
Chen, A., Xiang, M., Zhou, J., Jia, J., Shang, J., Li, X., Gašević, D. y Fan, Y. (2025). Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert. Computers and Education, 226, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105198
Cheng, Y., Fan, Y., Li, X., Chen, G., Gašević, D. y Swiecki, Z. (2025). Asking generative artificial intelligence the right questions improves writing performance. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100374
Chiu, T. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
Chocobar, E., Ubillús, J. y Cevallos, G. (2025). ¿Sólo el ChatGPT? Diferentes herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (GenAI) y sus usos: Una revisión de la literatura científica, 2021-2024. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 12(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2025.012.01.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2025.012.01.070
Chocobar, E. y Barreda, R. (2025). Estructuras metodológicas PICO y PRISMA 2020 en la elaboración de artículos de revisión sistemática: Lo que todo investigador debe conocer y dominar. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(1), 8525-8543. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i1.16491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i1.16491
Cinque, T. (2024). Exploring the paradox: Perceptions of AI in Higher Education – A Study of Hype and Scandal. Explorations in Media Ecology, 23, 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00205_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00205_7
Cui, Y. (2025). What Influences College Students Using AI for Academic Writing? - A Quantitative Analysis Based on HISAM and TRI Theory. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100391
Costa, I., Do Nascimento, M., Treviso, P., Chini, L., Roza, B., Barbosa, S. y Mendes, K. (2024). Using the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer in academic writing in health: a scoping review. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem, 32, e4194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7133.4194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7133.4195
Dai, W., Tsai, Y., Lin, J., Aldino, A., Jin, H., Li, T., Gašević, D. y Chen, G. (2024). Assessing the proficiency of large language models in automatic feedback generation: An evaluation study. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100299
Dakakni, D. y Safa, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora's box. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y. y Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers and Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
Digital Education Council (DEC, August 2, 2024). Digital Education Council Global AI Student Survey 2024. https://acortar.link/siv8XV
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F., Al-shami, S. y Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Keller, S., Köller, O. y Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209
Flores, J., García, A., Vizcarra, S.., De la Cruz, J., Gutiérrez, J., Quiroga, B. y Taype, A. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on the Peruvian National Licensing Medical Examination: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ, 9, e48039. https://doi.org/10.2196/48039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48039
Gao, Z., Cheah, J., Lim, X. y Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22, 100958. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958
Garg, A., Soodhani, K. y Rajendran, R. (2025). Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380
Gasaymeh, A., Beirat, M. y Abu, A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062
Gruenhagen, J., Sinclair, P., Carroll, J., Baker, P., Wilson, A. y Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273
Heung, Y. y Chiu, T. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
Holderried, F., Stegemann, C., Herschbach, L., Moldt, J., Nevins, A., Griewatz, J., Holderried, M., Herrmann, A., Festl, T. y Mahling, M. (2024a). A Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)–Powered Chatbot as a Simulated Patient to Practice History Taking: Prospective, Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e53961. https://doi.org/10.2196/53961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/53961
Holderried, F., Stegemann, C., Herrmann, A., Festl, T., Holderried, M., Eickhoff, C. y Mahling, M. (2024b). A Language Model–Powered Simulated Patient with Automated Feedback for History Taking: Prospective Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e59213. http://doi.org/10.2196/59213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/59213
Hu, W., Tian, J. y Li, Y. (2025). Enhancing student engagement in online collaborative writing through a generative AI-based conversational agent. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100979
Jafarian, N. y Kramer, A. (2025). AI-assisted audio-learning improves academic achievement through motivation and reading engagement. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100357
Jin, F., Sun, L., Pan, Y. y Lin, C. (2025). High heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. Computers and Education, 228, 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248
Kavadella, A., Dias, M. Kaklamanos, E., Stamatopoulos, V. y Giannakopoulos, K. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT’s Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e51344. http://doi.org/10.2196/51344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51344
Kinder, A., Briese, F., Jacobs, M., Dern, N., Glodny, N., Jacobs, S. y Leßmann, S. (2025). Effects of adaptive feedback generated by a large language model: A case study in teacher education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100349
Kim, R. (2024). Comparative analysis of AI-generated and human-made instructional videos: Effects on learning English caused-motion constructions by Korean high school EFL learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2024.27.4.179
Kizilcec, R., Huber, E., Papanastasiou, E. C., Cram, A., Makridis, C. A., Smolansky, A., Zeivots, S. y Raduescu, C. (2024). Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A. y Leimeister, J. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Knopp, M., Warm, E., Weber, D., Kelleher, M., Kinnear, B., Schumacher, D., Santen, S., Mendonça, E. y Turner, L. (2023). AI-Enabled Medical Education: Threads of Change, Promising Futures, and Risky Realities Across Four Potential Future Worlds. JMIR Med Educ, 9, e50373. https://doi.org/10.2196/50373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50373
Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students' perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279
Lai, C., Cheung, K., Chan, C. y Law, K. (2024). Integrating the adapted UTAUT model with moral obligation, trust and perceived risk to predict ChatGPT adoption for assessment support: A survey with students. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100246
Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D. y Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
Li, T., Zhan, Z., Ji, Y. y Li, T. (2025). Exploring human and AI collaboration in inclusive STEM teacher training: A synergistic approach based on self-determination theory. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101003
Magalhaes, S. y Cruz, R. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT in Medical Informatics Education: Mixed Methods Study on Student Perceptions and Experiential Integration Proposals. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e51151. http://doi.org/10.2196/51151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51151
Meinlschmidt, G., Koc, S., Boerner, E., Tegethoff, M., Simacek, T., Schirmer, L. y Schneider, M. (2025). Enhancing professional communication training in higher education through artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated exercises: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 25, 804. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07307-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07307-3
Meniado, J., Huyen, D., Panyadilokpong, N. y Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313
Molinari, A. y Molinari, E. (2025). The added value of academic writing instruction in the age of large language models: A critical analysis. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 22(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.33965/ijwi_2024220104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33965/ijwi_2024220104
Moorhouse, B. (2024). Beginning and first-year language teachers’ readiness for the generative AI age. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201
Moreno, A., Ventura, N. y Ventura, M. (2025). Neuroeducación en la resolución de problemas verbales, funciones ejecutivas y comprensión lectora: revisión sistemática exploratoria. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1376
Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N. y Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100277
Noda, M., Ueno, T., Koshu, R., Takaso, Y., Shimada, M. D., Saito, C., Sugimoto, H., Fushiki, H., Ito, M., Nomura, A. y Yoshizaki, T. (2024). Performance of GPT-4V in Answering the Japanese Otolaryngology Board Certification Examination Questions: Evaluation Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e57054. https://doi.org/10.2196/57054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/57054
Ojubanire, O., Olaleye, S., Marhraoui, M., Kamihanda, M., Oke, O. y Ojubanire, O. (2025). Awareness, perception, and adoption of ChatGPT in African HEIs: A multi-dimensional analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100999
Pan, M., Lai, C. y Guo, K. (2025). Effects of GenAI-empowered interactive support on university EFL students' self-regulated strategy use and engagement in reading. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100991
Pérez, G. (2025). La Publicación Académica y las Actitudes de los Investigadores: Revisión Sistemática. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 01-19. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-900
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Abdi, S., Bakharia, A., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., Denny, P. y Khosravi, H. (2024). Large language models meet user interfaces: The case of provisioning feedback. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100289
Rodrigues, L., Pereira, F., Cabral, L., Gašević, D., Ramalho, G. y Mello, R. (2024). Assessing the quality of automatic-generated short answers using GPT-4. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100248
Ruiz, K., Miramontes, M. y Reyna, C. (2024). Percepciones y expectativas de estudiantes universitarios sobre la IAG. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-357
Rutherford, T., Rodrigues, A., Duque, S., Veng, S., Mykyta, R., Cao, Y., Chisholm, K. y Bergwall, E. (2025). “I just think it is the way of the future”: Teachers’ use of ChatGPT to develop motivationally-supportive math lessons. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100367
Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M., Hariga, M. y As’ad, R. (2024). A Structural equation modeling analysis of generative AI chatbots adoption among students and educators in higher education. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100274
Sánchez, M. (2023). La inteligencia artificial generativa y la evaluación: ¿qué pasará con los exámenes? Investigación en educación médica, 12(48), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2023.48.23550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2023.48.23550
Segbenya, M., Bervell, B., Frimpong, E., Otoo, I., Andzie, T. y Achina, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling the antecedents of artificial intelligence usage and effects on 21st century employability skills among postgraduate students in Ghana. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100188
Siemens, G., Marmolejo, F., Gabriel, F., Medeiros, K., Marrone, R., Joksimovic, S. y de Laat, M. (2022). Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: AI, 3, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107
Smerdon, D. (2024). AI in essay-based assessment: Student adoption, usage, and performance. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288
Sousa, A. y Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students. Electronics, 14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258
Su, J., Ng, D. y Chu, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: The Challenges and Opportunities. Computers and Education: AI, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
Tai, T. y Chen, H. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers and Education, 220, 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112
Takahashi, H., Shikino, K., Kondo, T., Komori, A., Yamada, Y., Saita, M. y Naito, T. (2024). Educational Utility of Clinical Vignettes Generated in Japanese by ChatGPT-4: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e59133. https://doi.org/10.2196/59133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/59133
Teng, M. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
Tshidi, M. y Dewa, A. (2024). The promise and peril of Coding & Robotics education in South Africa: A scoping review of teacher preparation and generative artificial intelligence's potential for delivering equity. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), 96, 140-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i96a08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i96a08
Ubilla, A., Bustamante, D. y Pinuer, L. (2025). Clarificando tax morale: Revisión sistemática de literatura apoyada con inteligencia artificial. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10,1-18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-725
Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C. y Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers and Education, 215, 105031. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031
Valdés, G. (2025). La explicación en el aula de matemáticas: una revisión de la literatura. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 01-14. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-921
Valeri, F., Nilsson, P. y Cederqvist, A. (2025). Exploring students’ experience of ChatGPT in STEM education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360
Van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. y Sutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342
Wang, C. y Yin, H. (2025). How do Chinese undergraduates harness the potential of appraisal and emotions in generative AI-Powered learning? A multigroup analysis based on appraisal theory. Computers and Education, 228, 105250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105250
Wang, P., Jing, Y. y Shen, S. (2025). A systematic literature review on the application of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in teaching within higher education: Instructional contexts, process, and strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100996
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N. y Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228
Xiao, L., Pyng, H., Ayub, A., Zhu, Z., Gao, J. y Qing, Z. (2025). University Students’ Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Survey from China. Sustainability, 17(8), 3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083541
Yamamoto, A., Koda, M., Ogawa, H., Miyoshi, T., Maeda, Y., Otsuka, F. y Ino, H. (2024). Enhancing Medical Interview Skills Through AI-Simulated Patient Interactions: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e58753. http://doi.org/10.2196/58753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/58753
Yik, B. y Dood, A. (2024). ChatGPT Convincingly Explains Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Slightly Inaccurately with High Levels of Explanation Sophistication. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00235
Yilmaz, R. y Yilmaz, F. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: AI, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S. y Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S. y Li, L. (2024). Evaluating the AI dialogue System's intercultural, humorous, and empathetic dimensions in English language learning: A case study. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100262
Zhang, L. y Xu, J. (2025). The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978
Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, X. y Mai, W. (2025). A comprehensive overview of Generative AI (GAI): Technologies, applications, and challenges. Neurocomputing, 632, 1, 129645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129645
Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271
Zheldibayeva, R. (2025). GenAI as a Learning Buddy for Non-English Majors: Effects on Listening and Writing Performance. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025051. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.51
Zhou, S., Si, Y., Li, J., Manta, O. Y Yue, G. (2024). A Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Mobile Learning Adoption Based on SEM Models. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(22), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i22.52343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i22.52343
Zhong, B. y Liu, X. (2025). Evaluating AI literacy of secondary students: Framework and scale development. Computers and Education, 227, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Guillermo Enrique Cevallos López, Jeessikha Ubillús Reyes, Emilio Chocobar Reyes
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
