Integrating Task-oriented and Affective-support Instruction to Enhance AI Literacy: a Mixed-method Study among Non–CS(Computer Science) Students in Higher Education

Yuh-Tyng Chen; Sheau-ming Chen

doi:10.31637/epsir-2027-3010

Autores

Yuh-Tyng Chen Tainan University of Technology
Sheau-ming Chen Kainan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2027-3010

Palavras-chave:

AI, Task-oriented, Affective support, Digital learning anxiety, Self-regulation

Resumo

Introduction: Given rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, AI literacy has become a core skill for students to meet the demands of digital societies. This study examined the effectiveness of an instructional model combines task-oriented learning and emotional support to improve AI literacy among non–CS (Computer Science) students. Methodology: A quasi-experimental design was employed with 97 freshman students from various fields (business, finance, fine arts) at a Technology University in Taiwan. The experimental group (n = 53) received instruction based on task-oriented and emotional support principles while the control group (n = 44) received traditional lecture-based instruction. Results: It showed the experimental student group scored significantly higher AI literacy and self-efficacy experienced lower digital learning anxiety. No significant differences were observed in motivation to learn. Discussions: Mediation analyses confirmed self-regulatory confidence partly mediated the relationship between anxiety and achievement with fully mediated to link between motivation and achievement. Qualitative data further highlighted a psychological transformation pathway: Anxiety → Support → Confidence → Engagement → Achievement. Conclusions: It provides empirical evidence integrating task-oriented and emotional-supportive strategies can effectively improve AI literacy among non-CS majors, offering practical insights into AI curriculum and higher education policy.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografias Autor

Yuh-Tyng Chen, Tainan University of Technology

Dr. Yuh-Tyng Chen is now an Associate Professor in the Department of Living Services Industry, Tanina University of Technology, Taiwan. Before that, she was a Lecturer, an Assistant then an Associate professor in the Department of Information Management, the same University. She obtained her BA in Tunghai University (Taiwan), MS of Computer Science in New Jersey Institute of Technology (USA) and PhD of Creative Industries Design in National Cheng-Kung University (Taiwan). She is currently focusing research interests on Tech-enhanced learning, Learning behavior analysis, and Information tech. application.

Sheau-ming Chen, Kainan University

Dr. Sheau-Ming Chen is now an Assistant Professor in the School of Tourism and Transportation, Kainan University, Taiwan. His previous positions in the same University were a Lecturer then an Assistant professor of the Center for General Education. And before those, he ever serviced as a Lecturer of Environmental Engineering Department, Kun Shan University, Taiwan, for almost ten years. He received his Undergradute Degree in National Taipei Institute of Technology (now is National Taipei University of Tech.) Taiwan, MS of Environmental Science in New Jersey Institute of Technology (USA) and PhD of Resources Engineering in National Cheng-Kung University (Taiwan). His current research interests are Eco-environmental education, Sustainable development, and Environmental issues.

Referências

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 33(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, C. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). In-service teachers' conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 170, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 111(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353. https://doi.org/1 0.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336

Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746.

Hayes, J. (2022). The theory and practice of change management. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European journal of education, 57(4), 542-570. https://.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Huang, R. T., Jabor, M. K., Tang, T. W., & Chang, S. C. (2022). Examine the moderating role of mobile technology anxiety in mobile learning: A modified model of goal-directed behavior. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(1), 101-113.

Lee, C. (2016). Multilingual resources and practices in digital communication. In Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 18-132). Routledge.

Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y., & Lu, O. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 41.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16.

Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 566(2), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

Meyer, D K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 107-114.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 599(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University press.

Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Self-efficacy theory in education. In Handbook of motivation at school, (pp. 34-54). Routledge.

Shao, K., Pekrun, R., & Nicholson, L. J. (2019). Emotions in classroom language learning: What can we learn from achievement emotion research? System, 86, 102121.

Tejedor Mardomingo, M., Gil-Mediavilla, M., Alguacil Sánchez, S., Martínez-Valderrey, V. & Ruiz Ruiz, M. E. (2024). Tecnología educativa y mapas online interactivos para fomentar la movilidad sostenible y las rutas o caminos escolares. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-931

Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third-order barrier” for technology integration: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 288(6), 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.810

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 444(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Xie, B., Yuan, L., Li, S., Liu, C. H., Cheng, X., & Wang, G. (2022). Active learning for domain adaptation: An energy-based approach. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 36(8), 8708-8716.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 166(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 255(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016