Strategic variables for the sustainable development of Ecuador: a prospective analysis with MIC-MAC for the period 2025-2030
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2489Keywords:
Management, economics, planning, knowledge, sustainability, import, strategy, foresightAbstract
Introduction: Ecuador has implemented some strategies to improve its economy and its sustainability, in the first place, there is the increase in tax collection as a consequence of economic growth and adopted tax reforms. A second source of financing is income from oil sales, although production volumes have stagnated, it continues to be one of the main sources of income for Ecuador, given the current situation, it is necessary to propose sustainable strategies that will provide the country with an alternative and efficient long-term solution. Methodology: A qualitative and quantitative methodology was applied to the analysis variables to be considered as potential for investment. Results: Ecuador must implement strategies so that planning, education, knowledge management and technological innovation are aligned with sustainability. Discussion: In this context we must focus on improving education at all levels, investing in access to new technologies in order to implement a new horizon towards competitiveness, for which it is necessary to invest in research and technology applications. Conclusions: True sustainable growth in a country requires the effort of all stakeholders where everyone gets a return but at the same time contributes to the objectives of sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. y Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0685-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0685-x
Bloom, D. E., Kotschy, R., Prettner, K., Canning, D. y Schünemann, J. (2022). Health and Economic Growth: Reconciling the Micro and Macro Evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4148203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4148203
Cepal, N. (2022). Panorama Social de América Latina y el Caribe 2022: La transformación de la educación como base para el desarrollo sostenible. https://www.sidalc.net/search/Record/dig-cepal-11362-48518/Description
del Pino, D. G. (2024). Los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible de las Naciones Unidas y los Estados Unidos: Contradicciones en el Antropoceno The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the United States. Contradictions in the Anthropocene. La idea de cultura en acción en Mary Douglas, 109. https://acortar.link/WWwW6T
Filho, W. L., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Caldana, A. C. F., Will, M., Salvia, A. L., Rampasso, I. S., Anholon, R., Platje, J. y Kovaleva, M. (2020). Sustainability Leadership in Higher Education Institutions: An Overview of Challenges. Sustainability, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093761
Hanushek, E. A. y Woessmann, L. (2020). The Economic Impacts of Learning Losses. OECD Education Working Papers, 225. OECD Publishing.
Informe anual 2023. (s. f.). World Bank. Recuperado 24 de marzo de 2026, de https://www.bancomundial.org/es/about/annual-report-2023
Irena, R. E. S. (2020). International renewable energy agency. Abu Dhabi, 2020. https://acortar.link/IOS5bx
La Asamblea General adopta la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. (2015, septiembre 25). Desarrollo Sostenible. https://acortar.link/zMVEw
Martelo, R. J., Moncaris González, L. y Velez, L. (2016). Integración del Ábaco de Régnier, Encuestas y Lluvia de Ideas en la Definición de Variables Claves en Estudios Prospectivos. Información tecnológica, 27(5), 243-250. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7305873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642016000500025
Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G. y MacKerron, G. (2020). Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nature Energy, 5(11), 928-935.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Paola Andrea Suárez Torres , Amparo Isabel Pilicita Garrido, Yesenia Elizabeth Sánchez Torres, Digna Marcela Viteri Moya, César Antonio Portero Barrantes , Jesika Madelina Ojeda Hidalgo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
