Attention to the 4Cs of CLIL in Natural Sciences textbooks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2656

Keywords:

CLIL, CLIL materials, CLIL principles, primary education, bilingual teaching, natural sciences, textbooks, content analysis

Abstract

Introduction: This paper deals with the problem of effectively integrating CLIL principles in Natural Sciences, a subject taught through English in bilingual schools. To explore that integration, we map the coverage of the four CLIL principles (Content, Communication, Cognition and Culture) across the textbooks of Primary Education. Methodology: With this objective in mind, the study is based on the qualitative research paradigm, from which we adopt a descriptive-interpretative and comparative-relational approach. Using a categorical reference system, we employ explicit content analysis to process data from a documentary sample of twelve Natural Sciences textbooks from two different publishers. Results: The results reveal an uneven focus on the four CLIL principles in Natural Sciences textbooks, with the lowest scores found in Culture and Communication. Discussion: The findings align with analogous research, particularly with regard to the Culture principle. Conclusions: We emphasise the need to ensure the effective integration of CLIL principles in textbooks of Natural Sciences, as well as the importance of developing an intercultural scientific competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Álvaro Herrera-Sánchez, Universidad de Valladolid

He holds a bachelor’s degree in Elementary Education with a specialization in Foreign Languages (English) from the University of Valladolid and a master’s degree in Applied Educational Research. He is currently a doctoral candidate in the Doctoral Program in Transdisciplinary Research in Education at the University of Valladolid, focusing on teacher training. His research focuses on school materials commonly used in schools with bilingual education programs.

Francisco Javier Sanz-Trigueros, Universidad de Valladolid

He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Valladolid and serves as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Language and Literature Education at that same university. He teaches in the undergraduate and graduate programs of the School of Education and Social Work and coordinates the Foreign Languages track within the Master’s program in teacher education. His research focuses on the professional development of foreign language teachers and the factors influencing the quality of bilingual and multilingual education. He has over 35 publications in specialized journals; he has delivered numerous lectures and is a member of the GIR Q-ESE research group at the University of Valladolid.

Mariam Gevorgyan-Grigoryan, Universidad de Valladolid

She holds a bachelor’s degree in English Studies and a master’s degree in Teaching for Compulsory Secondary Education, High School, Vocational Training, and Language Instruction from the University of Valladolid. She is currently a doctoral student in the Doctoral Program in Transdisciplinary Research in Education at the University of Valladolid, focusing on teacher education. She balances her studies with work as an English teacher in compulsory secondary education and, on a temporary basis, as a substitute instructor in the Department of Language and Literature Didactics at the University of Valladolid. Her research focuses on factors influencing teaching quality in bilingual education.

References

Anastasiei, I. D. y Georgescu, M. R. (2020). Automated vs manual content analysis–a retrospective look. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 67, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2020-0025

Asociación de Enseñanza Bilingüe (2024). La enseñanza bilingüe en España. Datos para el análisis - 2024. MEET US Education Services S.L. https://shre.ink/qYQ9

Ball, P., Kelly, K. P. y Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford University Press.

Banegas, D. L. y Tavella, G. (2021). Language-driven CLIL in primary education: An analysis of general English coursebooks in Argentina. In C. Hemmi y D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International Perspectives on CLIL (pp. 239-258). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_12

Bardin, L. (2002). El análisis de contenido (3ª Edición). Akal.

Beacco, J. C. (2025). Tous plurilingues! Défense et illustration de la diversité des langues. Observatoire européen du plurilinguisme.

Bernete, F. (2013). Análisis de contenido. En A. Lucas Martín y A. Noboa (Eds.), Conocer lo social: estrategias y técnicas de construcción y análisis de datos (pp. 221-261). Fragua. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/35671

Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), 14-29.

https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.18772

Comisión Europea / EACEA / Eurydice (2023). Cifras clave de la enseñanza de lenguas en los centros escolares de Europa – Edición 2023, Informe Eurydice. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/543862

Council of Europe (2021). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. Volumen complementario. Servicio de publicaciones del Consejo de Europa. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional e Instituto Cervantes. https://shre.ink/qYQU

Council of Europe (2022). The importance of plurilingual and intercultural education for democratic culture. Recommendation CM/Rec (2022) adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 2 February 2022 and explanatory memorandum. Council of Europe. https://shre.ink/qYkP

Coyle, D., Hood, P. y Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Coyle, D. y Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies Teaching for Deeper Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914505

Cuenca, F. (2012). Communication as a Teaching/Learning Strategy in Bilingual Education. Journal of Siberian Federal University, 12, 1781-1789. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/15385

Czura, A. (2017). Translation is not enough. The need for pedagogical adaptation in CLIL textbook development. Porta Linguarum: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 27, 35-46. https://doi.org.10.30827/Digibug.53950

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011

De Verdalle, L., Vigour, C. y Le Bianic, T. (2012). S'inscrire dans une démarche comparative: Enjeux et controverses. Terrains & travaux, 21, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.3917/tt.021.0005

Đorđević, M. (2023). Integration of the 4Cs in a CLIL-based textbook for geology students: A case study. Technium Social Sciences, 52, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v52i1.10248

Elliott, R. y Timulak, L. (2021). Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: A generic approach. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000224-000

Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2019). An introduction to content and language integrated learning (CLIL) for teachers and teacher educators. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.21

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Heinemann.

Jorrín Abellán, I. M., Fontana Abad, M. y Rubia Avi, B. (2021). Investigar en educación. Síntesis.

Karabassova, L. y Oralbayeva, N. (2024). CLIL materials: From theory to practice. In D. Banegas y S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 328-340). Routledge. https://shre.ink/qYk0

Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science education, 94(5), 810-824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395

Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado, Núm. 340, del 30 de diciembre de 2020. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2020/12/29/3/dof/spa/pdf

López-Medina, B. (2021). On the Development of a CLIL Textbook Evaluation Checklist: A Focus Group Study. TESL-EJ, 25(1), 1-17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1302482

Luvezute Kripka, R. M., Scheller, M. y de Lara Bonotto, D. (2015). La investigación documental sobre la investigación cualitativa: conceptos y caracterización. Revista de investigaciones UNAD, 14(2), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.22490/25391887.1455

Mancipe Triviño, M. y Ramírez Valenzuela, C. M. (2019). El papel del lenguaje en la construcción de explicaciones en la clase de ciencias en contextos bilingües a través del enfoque CLIL. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 21(1), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.13095

Marcelino Aranda, M., Martínez Cuevas, M. C. y Camacho Vera, A. D. (2024). Análisis documental, un proceso de apropiación del conocimiento. Revista Digital Universitaria, 25(6). http://doi.org/10.22201/ceide.16076079e.2024.25.6.1

Martín del Pozo, M. A. y Rascón Estébanez, D. (2015). Textbooks for content and language integrated learning: Policy, market and appropriate didactics? Foro de Educación, 13(18), 123-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.007

Martinaj, F. (2020). Foreign Languages: The Key Factor in Employability. Management, 15(3), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.15.161-178

Martínez Rizo, F. (2022). La enseñanza de cultura científica en la escuela ¿Por qué falla?, ¿Cómo mejorar? Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 27(93), 629-646. Recuperado de: https://ojs.rmie.mx/index.php/rmie/article/view/131/259

Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for Producing CLIL Learning Material. Encuentro, 21, 15-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539729.pdf

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The qualitative report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Mortimore, L. (2024). Policy before research in bilingual education in Spain: teacher perceptions in STEAM classrooms. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 17(33), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v17i33.5991

Morton, T. (2017). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275-286.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352

Morton, T. (2020). Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7-17.

https://doi.org/10. 5565/rev/clil.33

Ornia Noriega, A., Fernández Costales, A. y Herce Sánchez, F. (2024). A rubric model to analyse CLIL textbooks in Primary Education. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 41, 259-277. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi41.27547

Pérez, S. y Martínez, M. (2020). El proceso de implantación del bilingüismo en Science en un centro concertado de Primaria y Secundaria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.61723

Pimentel-Velázquez, C. (2025). CLIL and materials for learning: a rubric for analysis. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1564

Reinoso Montoya, O. I. (2022). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) to Develop Writing Skills in English. Chakiñan, Revista De Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 20, 196-209. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.20.11

Renau, M. L. y Mas, S. (2019). A CLIL approach: evolution and current situation in Europe and in Spain. International Journal of Science and Research, 8, 1110-1119. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v8i12/ART20203503.pdf

Romeu Peyró, M. C., Cerezo Herrero, E. y Llamas Pérez, E. (2020). Thinking skills in Primary Education: An Analysis of CLIL Textbooks in Spain. Porta Linguarum: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 33, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26647

Salvi, V. y Tremblay, C. (2025). L’Europe se dirige-t-elle vers le plurilinguisme? In J. C. Herreras y C. Tremblay (Dirs.), Le plurilinguisme entre diversité et universalité (pp. 403-453). Observatoire européen du plurilinguisme.

Sanz-Trigueros, F. J. y Guillén-Díaz, C. (2021). Desarrollo profesional docente y capacidad de adaptación. Un marco estratégico en la cualificación del sector de especialistas de la enseñanza bilingüe. Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid. https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/67313

Tagnin, L. y Ní Ríordáin, M. (2021). Building science through questions in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00293-0

Tight, M. (2019). Documentary Research in the Social Sciences. Sage.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716559

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B. y Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Van Dijck, J. (2003). After the “Two Cultures” toward a “(multi) cultural” practice of science communication. Science Communication, 25(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003259540

Published

2026-03-18

How to Cite

Herrera-Sánchez, Álvaro, Sanz-Trigueros, F. J., & Gevorgyan-Grigoryan, M. (2026). Attention to the 4Cs of CLIL in Natural Sciences textbooks. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2656

Issue

Section

Cover articles