Percepciones estudiantiles sobre el modelo presencial y la transición hacia la educación híbrida: una revisión sistemática de la literatura académica (2020–2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2192Palavras-chave:
eduación superior, Enseñanza Híbrida, Modalidades Educativas, innovación didáctica, Nuevas Tecnologías, Percepción Estudiantil, plataformas digitales, prismaResumo
Introducción: El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar, mediante una revisión sistemática, la percepción de los estudiantes universitarios frente a la transición del modelo educativo presencial hacia el modelo híbrido en la educación superior, tras la pandemia del COVID-19. Metodología: Se empleó la metodología PRISMA, aplicando criterios de inclusión y exclusión definidos en función de idioma, tipo de documento, población objetivo, pertinencia temática, acceso y base de datos de publicación. La búsqueda se realizó en Scopus, Web of Science y Springer, aplicando operadores booleanos estratégicos. Resultados: Inicialmente se identificaron 185 artículos, de los cuales, tras el proceso de depuración, evaluación de títulos, resúmenes y revisión de texto completo, fueron seleccionados 9 estudios indexados que cumplían con todos los criterios establecidos. Discusión: Los artículos seleccionados evidenciaron que el modelo híbrido ha sido positivamente valorado por los estudiantes, destacándose mejoras en la motivación, satisfacción, adaptación, autonomía y desempeño académico. Asimismo, se observó un reconocimiento de su potencial para enriquecer la experiencia formativa y consolidarse como un enfoque pedagógico sostenible. Conclusiones: En conclusión, los resultados respaldan la viabilidad del modelo híbrido como respuesta a los desafíos pospandémicos en educación superior.
Downloads
Referências
Acosta, E. y Ruiz, E. (2022). Students’ emotions and engagement in the emerging hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(16), 10236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236
Batman, K. A. (2025). The Effect of Hybrid Learning on Academic Achievement and 21st Century Skills in Teacher Education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.1/941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.1/941
Carter, I., Harrington, C. y Ahrendt, S. (2024). An examination of an inquiry-based hybrid online/in-person science methods course. International Journal of Science Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2300090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2300090
Chai, W., Li, X. y Shek, D. (2022). The effectiveness of a leadership subject using a hybrid teaching mode during the pandemic: Objective outcome and subjective outcome evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169809
Green, J. K. (2022). Designing hybrid spaces for learning in higher education health contexts. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00268-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00268-y
Habimana, R. (2024). Hybrid Learning Models: Combining In-Person and Online Education Effectively. https://acortar.link/ePYRC6
Haningsih, S. y Rohmi, P. (2022). The pattern of hybrid learning to maintain learning effectiveness at the higher education level post-COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.243
He, B. y Guan, Q. (2024). Investigating the effects of spatial scales on social vulnerability index: A hybrid uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach combined with remote sensing land cover data. Risk Analysis, 44(11), 2723-2739. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14342
Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., Putra, Z. H., Mahartika, I. y Sulistiyo, U. (2024). Hybrid learning, blended learning or face-to-face learning: Which one is more effective in remediating misconception? Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-0019
Kanetaki, Z., Stergiou, C., Bekas, G., Jacques, S., Troussas, C., Sgouropoulou, C. y Ouahabi, A. (2022). Grade prediction modeling in hybrid learning environments for sustainable engineering education. Sustainability, 14(9), 5205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095205
Kubrusly, M., de Aquino, B. O. A., Simonian, T. S., do Nascimento Oliveira, M. y Rocha, H. A. L. (2024). Self-efficacy of medical students in a hybrid curriculum course (traditional and problem-based learning) and associated factors. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-05016-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-05016-3
Lee, J. E., Ottmar, E., Chan, J., Decker, L. y Booker, B. (2025). In-person versus virtual: Learning modality selections and movement during COVID-19 and their influence on student learning. Learning Environments Research, 28(1), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09525-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09525-4
Licht, F. A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Student Success in Virtual and In-Person Learning Environments: During and Post-COVID-19 [PhD Thesis, South College]. https://acortar.link/Bxc9gM
Lu, H. y Zhang, X. (2024). Multi-level students’ sense of community development in hybrid and online learning environments at higher educational institutions: A systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5397-5420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2214803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2214803
Mehta, K. J., Aula-Blasco, J. y Mantaj, J. (2024). University students’ preferences of learning modes post COVID-19-associated lockdowns: In-person, online, and blended. Plos one, 19(7), e0296670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296670
Miller, M., Kong, A. y Oh, J. E. (2024). Edu-Metaverse design: Perspectives of undergraduate learners. Computers & Education: X Reality, 5, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100079
Mu’amalah, H. (2024). Transforming student satisfaction in the digital era: A study of the effects of hybrid learning and digital literacy in islamic religious education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 4728-4736. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6143
Pan, S., Hafez, B., Iskandar, A. y Ming, Z. (2024). Integrating constructivist principles in an adaptive hybrid learning system for developing social entrepreneurship education among college students. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102023
Roque, R., López, A. y Salazar, R. (2024). Perceived instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in hybrid education post-COVID-19 lockdown in Mexico. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27342
Shephard, K., Luong, H., Connelly, S. y Tewari, V. (2024). University teachers’ perspectives on synchronous in-person and distance teaching and learning (SynPaD hybrid). Discover Education, 3(1), 200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00316-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00316-2
Wut, T. M., Xu, J. (Bill), Lee, S. W. y Lee, D. (2022). University Student Readiness and Its Effect on Intention to Participate in the Flipped Classroom Setting of Hybrid Learning. Education Sciences, 12(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070442
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Johanna Estefanía Rangel Saltos
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
